Examining crowding among winter recreationists in Rocky Mountain National Park

References

• Adelman, B., Heberlein, T., & Bonnickson, T. (1982). Social psychological explanations for the persistence of a conflict between paddling canoeists and motorcraft users in the boundary waters Canoe area. Leisure Sciences, 5, 45–61. doi: 10.1080/01490408209512989
   Google Scholar
• Bellin, R. (2005). Photo elicitation and the agricultural landscape: Seeing and telling about farming, community, and place. Visual Studies, 20(1), 56–68. doi: 10.1080/14725860500064904
   Google Scholar
• Botterill, T., & Crompton, J. (1987). Personal constructions of holiday snapshots. Annals of Tourism Research, 14, 152–156. doi: 10.1016/0160-7383(87)90059-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botterill, T., & Crompton, J. (1996). Two case studies exploring the nature of the tourist’s experience. Journal of Leisure Research, 28(1), 57–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bricker, K., & Schultz, J. (2015, March 4–5). Bear Lake road trailhead visitors of Rocky Mountain National Park. Poster presentation at the rocky mountain continental divide research learning center biennial research conference, Estes Park, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Cappello, M. (2005). Photo interviews: Eliciting data through conversations with children. Field Methods, 17(2), 170–182. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05274553
   Google Scholar
• Collier, J. (1967). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. New York, NY: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Eagles, R. (2002). Trends in park tourism: Economics, finance, and management. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 10(2), 132–153. doi: 10.1080/09669580208667158
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, I., Stevens, B., McKeever, P., & Baruchel, S. (2006). Photo elicitation interview: Using photos to elicit children’s perspectives. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, B., Johnson, C., & Kivel, D. (2009). Rocky Mountain National Park: History and culture as factors in African-American park visitation. Journal of Leisure Research, 41(4), 529–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freuler, B., & Hunziker, M. (2007). Recreation activities in protected areas: Bridging the gap between the attitudes and behavior of snowshoe walkers. Forest Snow and Landscape Research, 81(1–2), 191–206.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, H., & Ruddell, E. (1995). The effect of goal orientation and place dependence on select goal interferences among winter backcountry users. Leisure Sciences, 17(3), 171–183. doi: 10.1080/01490409509513255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graefe, A., Kuss, F., & Vaske, J. (1990). Visitor impact management: The planning framework. Washington, DC: National Parks & Conservation Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hammit, W., Cole, D., & Monz, C. (2015). Wildland recreation: Ecology and management. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, D. (1997). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17, 13–26. doi: 10.1080/14725860220137345
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, W. (1995). A resurgence in recreation conflict research: Introduction to the special issue. Leisure Sciences, 17(3), 157–158. doi: 10.1080/01490409509513253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood, J., Manning, R., & Vaske, J. (2002). Normative research in outdoor recreation: Progress and prospects for continued development and applications. Leisure Sciences, 24, 251–253. doi: 10.1080/01490400290050709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (1965). Structural characteristics of norms. In I. Steiner & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 301–309). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, G., & Schreyer, R. (1980). Conflict in outdoor recreation: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 12, 368–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, L., Taylor, M., Mendo, J., Tam, J., & Wolff, M. (2016). Carrying capacity simulations as a tool for ecosystem-based management of a scallop aquaculture system. Ecological Modelling, 331, 44–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leujak, W., & Ormond, R. (2007). Visitor perceptions and the shifting social carrying capacity of South Sinai’s coral reefs. Environmental Management, 39(4), 472–489. doi: 10.1007/s00267-006-0040-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lime, D. (1996). Congestion and crowding in the national park system: Guidelines for management and recreation. Minnesota agricultural experiment stations publication, 86–1996. St. Paul, MN: Department of Forest Resources and Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. (1985). Crowding norms in backcountry settings: A review and synthesis. Journal of Leisure Research, 17, 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R. (2001). Visitor experience and resource protection: A framework for managing the carrying capacity of national parks. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 19, 93–108.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. (2002). How much is too much? Carrying capacity of national parks and protected areas. In A. Arnberger, C. Brandenburg, & A. Muhar (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference on monitoring and management of visitor flows in recreational and protected areas (pp. 306–313). Vienna: Bodenkultur University.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Lime, D., Freimund, W., & Pitt, D. (1996). Crowding norms at front country sites: A visual approach to setting standards of quality. Leisure Sciences, 18, 39–59. doi: 10.1080/01490409609513271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Newman, P., Valliere, W., Wang, B., & Lawson, S. (2001). Respondent self-assessment of research on crowding norms in outdoor recreation. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(3), 251–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R., & Valliere, W. (2001). Coping in outdoor recreation: Causes and consequences of crowding and conflict among community residents. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(4), 410–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Valliere, W., Minteer, B., Wang, B., & Jacobi, C. (2000). Crowding in parks and outdoor recreation: A theoretical, empirical, and managerial analysis. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 18(4), 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, C. (1996). Normative perspectives on outdoor recreation behavior: Introductory comments. Leisure Sciences, 18, 1–6. doi: 10.1080/01490409609513268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Park Service. (1997). Strategic plan 2001–2005. Retrieved from http://planning.nps.gov/document/NPS_strategic_plan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Park Service. (2011). National Park Service comprehensive survey of the American Public 2008–2009: Racial and ethnic diversity of national park system visitors and non-visitors. Retrieved from http://www.nature.nps.gov/socialscience/docs/CompSurvey2008_2009RaceEthnicity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Park Service. (2015). America’s best idea today. Retrieved from http://www.nps.gov/americasbestidea/
   Google Scholar
• National Parks Conservation Association. (2015). Ten most visited parks. Retrieved from http://www.npca.org/exploring-our-parks/visitation.html
   Google Scholar
• Needham, M., & Rollins, R. (2005). Interest group standards for recreation and tourism impacts at ski areas in the summer. Tourism Management, 26(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2003.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietila, M., & Fagerholm, N. (2016). Visitors’ place-based evaluations of unacceptable tourism impacts in Oulanka National Park, Finland. Tourism Geographies, 18(3), 258–279. doi: 10.1080/14616688.2016.1169313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettebone, D., Meldrum, B., Leslie, C., & Lawson, S. (2013). A visitor use monitoring approach on the half dome cables to reduce crowding and inform park planning decisions in Yosemite National Park. Landscape and Urban Planning, 118, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Broadcasting Service. (2015). The national parks: America’s best idea. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/nationalparks/
   Google Scholar
• Ramthun, R. (1995). Factors in user group conflict between hikers and mountain bikers. Leisure Sciences, 17(3), 159–169. doi: 10.1080/01490409509513254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodella, I., Corbau, C., Simeoni, U., & Utizi, K. (2017). Assessment of the relationship between geomorphological evaluation, carrying capacity, and users’ perception: Case studies in Emilia-Romagna. Tourism Management, 59, 7–22. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roggenbuck, J., Williams, D., Bange, S., & Dean, D. (1991). River float trip encounter norms: Questioning the use of the social norms concept. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 133–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, I. (2000). Revisiting and revising recreation conflict research. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), 129–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelby, B., & Vaske, J. (1991). Resource and activity substitutes for recreational salmon fishing in New Zealand. Leisure Sciences, 13, 21–32. doi: 10.1080/01490409109513122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sievanen, T. (2012). Monitoring outdoor recreation trends in Finland. In P. Fredman, M. Stenseke, H. Liljendahl, A. Mossing, & D. Laven (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on monitoring and management of visitors in recreational and protected areas. Outdoor recreation in change – Current knowledge and future challenges (pp. 76–77). Stockholm: Friluftsliv i förändring.
   Google Scholar
• Stankey, G., Cole, D., Lucas, R., Peterson, M., Frissell, S., & Washburne, R. (1985). The limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-176. Ogden, UT: Intermountain Forest & Range Station.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, W., & Cole, D. (2001). Number of encounters and experience quality in grand canyon backcountry: Consistently negative and weak relationships. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(1), 106–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streberova, E., & Juskova, L. (2015). Standards of quality for outdoor recreation in Tatra National Park: A contribution to integrated visitor monitoring and management. Journal on Protected Mountain Areas and Research Management, 7(1), 56–65. doi: 10.1553/eco.mont-7-1s56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, E. (1936). Special report on a wildlife study of the high Sierra in Sequoia and Yosemite national parks and adjacent territory. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, National Park Service.
   Google Scholar
• Thapa, B., & Graefe, A. (2004). Recreation conflict and tolerance among skiers and snowboarders. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 22(1), 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, D., Norman, J., & Newman, P. (2010). Estimating visitor use of protected areas by modeling accessibility: A case study in RMNP, Colorado. Journal of Conservation Planning, 6, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J., Carothers, P., Donnelly, M., & Baird, B. (2000). Recreation conflict among skiers and snowboarders. Leisure Sciences, 22, 297–313. doi: 10.1080/01490409950202311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaske, J., & Shelby, L. (2008). Crowding as a descriptive indicator and an evaluative standard: Results from 30 years of research. Leisure Sciences, 30(2), 111–126. doi: 10.1080/01490400701881341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A. (1995). An analysis of recent progress in recreation conflict research and perceptions of future challenges and opportunities. Leisure Sciences, 17(3), 235–238. doi: 10.1080/01490409509513259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyttenbach, M., Haider, W., Probstl, U., & Rupf, R. (2012). Too many people in the mountains in the winter time? In P. Fredman, M. Stenseke, H. Liljendahl, A. Mossing, & D. Laven (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on monitoring and management of visitors in recreational and protected areas. Outdoor recreation in change – Current knowledge and future challenges (pp. 296–297). Stockholm: Friluftsliv i förändring.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Chung, S., & Qiu, J. (2016). Ecological carrying capacity assessment of diving site: A case study of Mabul Island, Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Management, 183(1), 253–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar