189
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Advancing visitor research uptake in policy and practice: a structural equation model

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 766-785 | Received 16 Aug 2020, Accepted 11 Jun 2021, Published online: 13 Jul 2021

References

  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
  • Amara, N., Ouimet, M., & Landry, R. (2004). New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of university research in government agencies. Science Communication, 26(1), 75–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547004267491
  • Anderson, C., Ciarlo, J. A., & Brodie, S. (1981). Measuring evaluation-induced change in mental health programs. In J. A. Ciarlo (Ed.), Utilizing evaluation: Concepts and measurement techniques (pp. 97–124). Sage Publications.
  • Arnott, J. C., Neuenfeldt, R. J., & Lemos, M. C. (2020). Co-producing science for sustainability: Can funding change knowledge use? Global Environmental Change, 60, Article no. 101979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101979
  • Belkhodja, O., Amara, N., Landry, R., & Ouimet, M. (2007). The extent and organisational determinants of research utilisation in Canadian health services organisations. Science Communication, 28(3), 377–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547006298486
  • Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS, structural equations. Program manual [Program version 3.0] (p. 6). BMDP Statistical Software.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  • Benton, T. (2015). An empirical assessment of Guttman’s lambda 4 reliability coefficient. In R. E. Millsap, D. M. Bolt, L. A. Van der Ark, & W. C. Wang (Eds.), Quantitative psychology research: The 78th Annual meeting of the psychometric society (pp. 301–310). Springer.
  • Blahna, D. J., Kline, J. D., Williams, D. R., Rogers, K., Miller, A. B., McCool, S. F., & Valenzuela, F. (2020). Integrating social, ecological, and economic factors in sustainable recreation planning and decisionmaking. In S. Selin, L. K. Cerveny, D. J. Blahna, & A. B. Miller (Eds.), Igniting research for outdoor recreation: Linking science, policy, and action (pp. 173–188). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
  • Bolarinwa, O. A. (2015). Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal, 22(4), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.4103/1117-1936.173959
  • Booth, K. (2006). Review of visitor research for the department of conservation: DOC research and development series 229. New Zealand Department of Conservation.
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
  • Buckley, R., Robinson, J., Carmody, J. & King, N. (2008). Monitoring for management of conservation and recreation in Australian protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17(14), 3589-3606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9448-7
  • Camisón, C., & Forés, B. (2010). Knowledge absorptive capacity: New insights for its conceptualisation and measurement. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 707–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.04.022
  • Caplan, N. (1979). The Two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. American Behavioral Scientist, 22(3), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427902200308
  • Chambers, D. (2018). Tourism research: Beyond the imitation game. Tourism Management Perspectives, 25, 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.11.010
  • Cherney, A., Head, B., Boreham, P., Povey, J., & Ferguson, M. (2012). Perspectives of academic social scientists on knowledge transfer and research collaborations. Evidence and Policy, 8(4), 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426412X660098
  • Cherney, A., Head, B., Boreham, P., Povey, J., & Ferguson, M. (2013). Research utilisation in the social sciences: A comparison of five academic disciplines in Australia. Science Communication, 35(6), 780–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013491398
  • Cherney, A., & McGee, T. R. (2011). Utilisation of social science research: Results of a pilot study among Australian sociologists and criminologists. Journal of Sociology, 47(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783310386831
  • Cherney, A., Povey, J., Head, B., Boreham, P., & Ferguson, M. (2012). What influences the utilisation of educational research by policy-makers and practitioners?: The perspectives of academic educational researchers. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.08.001
  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  • Cooper, C., Ruhanen, L., & Scott, N. (2015). Knowledge management in tourism: Are the stakeholders research-averse? In T. V. Singh (Ed.), Challenges in tourism research (pp. 309–337). Channel View.
  • Crona, B. I., & Parker, J. N. (2011). Network determinants of knowledge utilization: Preliminary lessons from a boundary organization. Science Communication, 33(4), 448–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547011408116
  • Darcy, S., Griffin, T., Craig, M., Moore, S., & Crilley, G. (2007, February 11–14). Protected area visitor data collection and management: Emerging issues and gaps in current Australian practices [Paper presentation]. CAUTHE 2007: Tourism-Past Achievements, Future Challenges, Manly, Australia.
  • Davies, H., Nutley, S., & Walter, I. (2008). Why ‘knowledge transfer’ is misconceived for applied social research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13(3), 188–190. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008055
  • de Goede, J., van Bon-Martens, M. J. H., Putters, K., & van Oers, H. A. M. (2012). Looking for interaction: Quantitative measurement of research utilisation by Dutch local health officials. Health Research Policy and Systems, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-10-9
  • Dunn, W. N. (1980). The two-communities metaphor and models of knowledge use: An exploratory case survey. Knowledge, 1(4), 515–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708000100403
  • Eagles, P. F. J. (2002). Tourism-use measurement and reporting in parks and protected areas. Parks, 12(1), 3–10.
  • Estabrooks, C. A., Squires, J. E., Strandberg, E., Nilsson-Kajermo, K., Scott, S. D., Profetto-McGrath, J., Harley, D., & Wallin, L. (2011). Towards better measures of research utilisation: A collaborative study in Canada and Sweden. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(8), 1705–1718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05610.x
  • Farrell, T. A., & Marion, J. L. (2002). The protected area visitor impact management (PAVIM) framework: A simplified process for making management decisions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 10(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580208667151
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE Publications.
  • Griffin, T., Moore, S., Darcy, S., & Crilley, G. (2008, October 14–19). Developing a national approach to visitor data collection, management and use for protected areas: Thoughts from Australian research and practice [Paper presentation]. Fourth International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas: Management for Protection and Sustainable Development, Montecatini Terme, Tuscany, Italy.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Partial least squares: The better approach to structural equation modeling? Long Range Planning, 45(5-6), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.011
  • Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(2), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  • Hall, G. E., Loucks, S. F., Rutherford, W. L., & Newlove, B. W. (1975). Levels of use of the innovation: A framework for analysing innovation adoption. Journal of Teacher Education, 26(1), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248717502600114
  • Heinsch, M., Gray, M., & Sharland, E. (2016). Re-conceptualising the link between research and practice in social work: A literature review on knowledge utilisation. International Journal of Social Welfare, 25(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12164
  • Hemsley-Brown, J. (2004). Facilitating research utilisation: A cross-sector review of research evidence. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(6), 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550410554805
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  • Hjalager, A. M. (2002). Repairing innovation defectiveness in tourism. Tourism Management, 23(5), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00013-4
  • Hockings, M., Dudley, N., Elliot, W., Ferreira, M. N., MacKinnon, K., Pasha, M. K. S., Phillips, A., Stolton, S., Woodley, S., Appleton, M., Chassot, O., Fitzsimons, J., Galliers, C., Kroner, R. G., Goodrich, J., Hopkins, J., Jackson, W., Jonas, H., Long, B., … Yang, A. (2020). Editorial essay: COVID-19 and protected and conserved areas. Parks, 26(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.PARKS-26-1MH.en
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008, June 19-20). Evaluating model Fit: A synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature. In A. Brown (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on research methodology for Business and management studies (pp. 195–200). Academic Conferences and Publishing Limited.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Huberman, M., & Thurler, G. (1991). De la recherche à la pratique: Éléments de base [From the research to the practice: elements of base]. Peter Lang.
  • Hudson, S. (2013). Knowledge exchange: A destination perspective. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 2(3), 129–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2013.08.002
  • Ion, G., Stîngu, M., & Marin, E. (2019). How can researchers facilitate the utilisation of research by policy-makers and practitioners in education? Research Papers in Education, 34(4), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1452965
  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. Guilford publications.
  • Knott, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1980). If dissemination is the solution, what is the problem? Knowledge, 1(4), 537–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708000100404
  • Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2001). Utilisation of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy, 30(2), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00081-0
  • Landry, R., Lamari, M., & Amara, N. (2003). The extent and determinants of the utilisation of University research in government agencies. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00279
  • Larsen, J. K. (1981). Knowledge utilisation: Current issues. In R. F. Rich (Ed.), The knowledge cycle (pp. 149–168). Sage.
  • Lei, P. W., & Wu, Q. (2007). Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(3), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00099.x
  • Lovelock, B., Farminer, A., Reis, A. C., & New Zealand Department of Conservation (2011). A synthesis and gap analysis of research on visitors to public conservation areas in Australia, 1995–2010. Department of Conservation.
  • Mair, J., Merton, E., & Smith, L. (2014, February 10–13). Research into policy and knowledge co-generation in tourism [Paper presentation]. CAUTHE 2014: Tourism and Hospitality in the Contemporary World: Trends, Changes and Complexity, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Manning, R. E. (2011). Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction. Oregon State University Press.
  • Manning, R. E., Anderson, L. E., & Pettengill, P. (2017). Managing outdoor recreation: Case studies in the national parks. CABI.
  • Marion, J. L. (2016). A review and synthesis of recreation Ecology research supporting carrying capacity and visitor Use management decisionmaking. Journal of Forestry, 114(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.15-062
  • McCool, S. F. (2006). Managing for visitor experiences in protected areas: Promising opportunities and fundamental challenges. Parks: The International Journal for Protected Areas Managers, 16(2), 3–9.
  • McCool, S. F. (2012). Potential roles of research in enhancing the performance of management in securing high quality visitor experiences in wilderness. In D. N. Cole (Ed.), Wilderness visitor experiences: Progress in research and management (pp. 179–187). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
  • McCool, S. F., & Khumalo, K. E. (2015). Empowering managers: Enhancing the performance of protected area tourism managers in the twenty-first century. Tourism Recreation Research, 40(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2015.1039333
  • McCool, S. F., & Stankey, G. H. (2003, April 14–18). Advancing the dialogue of visitor management: Expanding beyond the culture of technical control [Paper presentation]. George Wright Society Biennial Conference, San Diego, California.
  • McCulloch, S. (2016). Absorptive capacity for responding to environmental change: An assessment of three public-sector agencies [Unpublished Master’s dissertation]. Nelson Mandela University, George.
  • Menon, A., & Wilcox, J. (1994). USER: A scale to measure use of market research. Technical Working Paper No 94. Marketing Science Institute.
  • Mikulić, J. (2018). Towards an end of measurement misspecification in tourism research: Grammar of theoretical constructs, focus of thought and mind traps. Tourism Management, 68, 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.04.010
  • Mikulić, J., & Ryan, C. (2018). Reflective versus formative confusion in SEM based tourism research: A critical comment. Tourism Management, 68, 465–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.05.002
  • Moore, S., & Hockings, M. (2013). Australian protected areas and adaptive management: Contributions by visitor planning frameworks and management effectiveness assessments. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 20(4), 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2013.833487
  • Murray, K., Roux, D. J., Nel, J. L., Driver, A., & Freimund, W. (2011). Absorptive capacity as a guiding concept for effective public sector management and conservation of freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Management, 47(5), 917–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9659-7
  • Newman, J., & Head, B. (2015). Beyond the two communities: A reply to mead’s “why government often ignores research”. Policy Sciences, 48(3), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9226-9
  • Newsome, D., Moore, S. A., & Dowling, R. K. (2013). Natural area tourism: Ecology, impacts, and management. Channel View Publications.
  • Nunkoo, R., Ramkissoon, H., & Gursoy, D. (2013). Use of structural equation modeling in tourism research: Past, present, and future. Journal of Travel Research, 52(6), 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513478503
  • Nusair, K., & Hua, N. (2010). Comparative assessment of structural equation modelling and multiple regression research methodologies: E-commerce context. Tourism Management, 31(3), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.03.010
  • Oh, C. H. (1997). Issues for the new thinking of knowledge utilization: Introductory remarks. Knowledge and Policy, 10(3), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912503
  • Olszewski, M. (2015). The determinants of knowledge transfer from universities to tourism companies–a conceptual model and research propositions. European Journal of Service Management, 16(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.18276/smt.2015.16-11
  • Olszewski, M., & Bednarska, M. A. (2016, June 26–30). Why don’t tourism firms use academic knowledge for innovation? A conceptual framework [Paper presentation]. EATSA Conference: A Pathway for the New Generation of Tourism Research, Portugal.
  • Ottoson, J. M. (2009). Knowledge-for-action theories in evaluation: Knowledge utilization, diffusion, implementation, transfer, and translation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2009(124), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.310
  • Ouimet, M., Landry, R., Ziam, S., & Bédard, P. O. (2009). The absorption of research knowledge by public civil servants. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 5(4), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426409X478734
  • Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS program (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Pyo, S. (2012). Identifying and prioritising destination knowledge needs. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), 1156–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.12.009
  • Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Fazey, I., Evely, A. C., & Kruijsen, J. H. (2014). Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 146, 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.021
  • Rich, R. F. (1997). Measuring knowledge utilization: Processes and outcomes. Knowledge and Policy, 10(3), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912504
  • Ritchie, R. J., & Ritchie, J. B. (2002). A framework for an industry supported destination marketing information system. Tourism Management, 23(5), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00007-9
  • Rosenberg, N., & Nathan, R. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Roux, D. J., Kingsford, R. T., Cook, C. N., Carruthers, J., Dickson, K., & Hockings, M. (2019). The case for embedding researchers in conservation agencies. Conservation Biology, 33(6), 1266–1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13324
  • Roux, D. J., Rogers, K. H., Biggs, H. C., Ashton, P. J., & Sergeant, A. (2006). Bridging the science-management divide moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecology and Society, 11(1).
  • Stone, M. (1979). Comments on model selection criteria of Akaike and Schwarz. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 41(2), 276–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1979.tb01084.x
  • Suhr, D. (2006, March 29). Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis? [Paper presentation]. Thirty-first Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, Cary, NC, United States.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
  • Tanriverdi, H., & Venkatraman, N. (2005). Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.435
  • Thomas, R. (2012). Business elites, universities and knowledge transfer in tourism. Tourism Management, 33(3), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.06.009
  • Turner, S. (2013). Absorptive capacity: The role of communities of practice. Working Paper No.444. University of Cambridge.
  • van der Arend, J. (2014). Bridging the research/policy gap: Policy officials’ perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to effective links between academic and policy worlds. Policy Studies, 35(6), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2014.971731
  • Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
  • Wardell, M. J., & Moore, S. A. (2004). Collection, storage and application of visitor use data in protected areas: Guiding principles and case studies. CRC for Sustainable Tourism Pty.
  • Weaver, D. B., & Lawton, L. J. (2017). A new visitation paradigm for protected areas. Tourism Management, 60, 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.11.018
  • Westland, J. C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(6), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003
  • Xiao, H., & Smith, S. L. J. (2007). The use of tourism knowledge: Research propositions. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(2), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2006.09.001
  • Yin, R. K., & Moore, G. B. (1988). Lessons on the utilization of research from nine case experiences in the natural hazards field. Knowledge in Society, 1(3), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02736981
  • Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review. Reconceptualisation, and Extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.