Beyond Lisbon: Soft European Spatial Planning

References

• Bauer , K.-J. 2009 . “ Pannonien: Eine fiktive Provinz? ” . In Raum 24 – 27 . 76/09
   Google Scholar
• Bialasiewicz , L. , Elden , S. and Painter , J. 2006 . The Constitution of EU Territory. . Comparative European Politics , 3 : 345 – 46 .
   Google Scholar
• Barca , F. 2009 . An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations (Independent report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy). http://www.interact-eu.net/news/barca_report/7/2647 (accessed 27 July 2009)
   Google Scholar
• Begg , I. 2009 . The Future of Cohesion Policy in Richer Regions: Working Paper No. 03/2009. European Union—Regional Policy. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/work/2009_03_richer.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Beck , U. 1999 . World Risk Society Cambridge : Polity Press .
   Google Scholar
• CEC—COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES . 1999 . European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards a Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
   Google Scholar
• CEC—COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES . 2004 . A New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation—Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
   Google Scholar
• CEC—COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES . 2009a . Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions concerning the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/communic/baltic/com_baltic_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CEC—COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES . 2009b . Macro-regional strategies in the European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/cooperation/baltic/pdf/macroregional_strat-egies_2009.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• COMMITTEE OF QUALIFICATION OF PLANNERS . 1950 . Schuster Report. London : HMSO . 1960
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi , S. 2007 . “ Territorial cohesion, the European social model, and spatial policy research. ” . In Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society. Edited by: Faludi , A. 81 – 104 . Cambridge MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi , S. and Strange , I. , eds. 2009 . Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning. London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Didelon , C. , Grasland , C. and Richard , Y. , eds. 2008 . Atlas de l'Europe dans le Monde. Paris: La Documentation Française
   Google Scholar
• EUROPEAN COUNCIL . 2010 . Conclusions 17 June 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/115346.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi , A. , ed. 2006 . 3 – 70 . Evidence-based Planning (Special Issue), disP165, 42(2)
   Google Scholar
• Faludi , A. 2007 . “ The European model of society. ” . In Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society. Edited by: Faludi , A. 1 – 22 . Cambridge MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
   Google Scholar
• Faludi , A. 2010 . Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age? London : Routledge . (RTPI Library Series)
   Google Scholar
• Faludi , A. and Waterhout , B. 2002 . The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No Masterplan. London : Routledge . (RTPI Library Series)
   Google Scholar
• Graham , S. and Marvin , S. 2001 . Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and Urban Conditions London, New York : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Harvey , D. 1969 . Explanation in Geography. London : Edward Arnold .
   Google Scholar
• Healey , P. 2007 . Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times. London, New York : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck , A. and Ferrera , M. 2004 . “ Welfare reform in the shadow of EMU. ” . In Euros and Europeans: Monetary Integration and the European Model of Society. Edited by: Martin , A. and Ross , G. 248 – 277 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Haughton , G. , Allmendinger , PH. , Counsell , D. and Vigar , G. 2010 . The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries. London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Nugent , N. 2003 . The Government and Politics of the European Union., , 5th edition London : Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Pallagst , K. M. 2006 . European spatial planning reloaded: Considering EU enlargement in theory and practice. . European Planning Studies. , 1 ( 2 ) : 253 – 272 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samecki , P. 2009 . Cohesion policy and territorial development speech to the Kiruna Conference on 10–11 December 2009. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/1894&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN.
   Google Scholar
• Tatzberger , G. 2008 . A Global Economic Integration Zone in Central Europe?—Vienna-Bratislava-Györ as a Laboratory for EU Territorial Cohesion Policy. Vienna: Plankopie Eder
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukalis , L. , Cramme , O. and Liddle , R. 2009 . An EU “fit for purpose” in the global age—Can we rise to the challenge? 21 Synthesis Report. London: Policy Network. p. http://www.policy-network.net/publications/publications.aspx?id=3322.
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld , W . 2005a . Expansive spatial planning: The new European transnational spatial visions. . European Planning Studies. , 13 ( 1 ) : 137 – 155 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonneveld , W. 2005b . Multiple visioning: New ways of constructing transnational spatial visions. . Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. , 23 ( 1 ) : 41 – 62 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar