Evaluating the Impact of Informal Institutional Arrangements on the Transfer of Development Rights for Built Heritage Conservation in Dense Cities

References

• Adeoti, O. (2014): An institutional analysis of the implementation of integrated water resources management in Nigeria, PhD thesis, Cranfield University.
   Google Scholar
• Afroz, S.; Cramb, R.; Grunbuhel, C. (2016): Collective management of water resources in coastal Bangladesh: formal and substantive approaches. Human Ecology, 44 (1), pp.17–31. doi: 10.1007/s10745-016-9809-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandaragoda, D. J. (2000): A framework for institutional analysis for water resources management in a river basin context, working paper 5. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
   Google Scholar
• Bruening, A. D. (2008): TDR Siren Song: The Problems with Transferable Development Rights Programs and How to Fix Them. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 23 (2), pp. 423–440.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, E. H.W. (2000): Impact of major environmental legislation on property development. In Wong, W. S.; Chan, E. H. (eds.), Building Hong Kong: Environmental considerations, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, pp. 273–295.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, E. H.W.; Yung, E. H. K. (2004): Is the development control legal framework conducive to a sustainable dense urban development in Hong Kong? Habitat International, 28 (3), pp. 409–426. doi: 10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00040-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, E. H.W.; Hou, J. (2015): Developing a framework to appraise the critical success factors of transfer development rights (TDRs) for built heritage conservation. Habitat International, 46, pp. 35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Chiodelli, F.; Moroni, S. (2016): Zoning-integrative and zoning-alternative transferable development rights: compensation, equity, efficiency. Land Use Policy, 52, 422–429. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costonis, J. (1973): Development Rights Transfer: An Exploratory Essay. Yale Law Journal, 83, pp. 75–128. doi: 10.2307/795319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danner, J. C. (1997): TDRs-great idea but questionable value. The Appraisal Journal, 65, pp. 133–142.
   Google Scholar
• Development Rights Transfer in New York City (1972): The Yale Law Journal, 82 (2), pp. 338–372. doi:10.2307/795117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feitshans, T. A. (2002): PDRs and TDRs: Land Preservation Tools in a Universe of Voluntary and Compulsory Land Used Planning Tools. Drake Journal of Agricultural Law, 7, pp. 305–329.
   Google Scholar
• GHK (Hong Kong) Ltd. (2013): Study on the feasibility, framework and Implementation Plan for Setting up a Statutory Heritage Trust in Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Institute of Planner (HKIP) (2007): Heritage conservation policy in Hong Kong. Position paper, online: http://www.hkip.org.hk/En/Content.asp?Bid=7&Sid=42&Id=71 (accessed June 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Hou, J.; Chan, E. H.W. (2017): Policy approaches for sustainable conservation of built heritage using transfer of development rights: international comparison. Sustainable Development, 25 (6), pp. 528–545. doi: 10.1002/sd.1676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, J.; Chan, E. H.W.; Li, L. H. (2018): Transfer of development rights as an institutional innovation to address issues of property rights. Journal of Housing & the Built Environment, 33 (3), pp. 465–479. doi: 10.1007/s10901-018-9613-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, M.; Machemer, P.; Pruetz, R. (2008): Planners’ experiences in managing growth using transferable development rights (TDR) in the United States. Land Use Policy, 25 (3), pp. 378–387. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M.; Newig, J. (2014): From planning to implementation: top-down and bottom-up approaches for collaborative watershed management. Policy Studies Journal, 42 (3), pp. 416–442. doi: 10.1111/psj.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusel, J.; Cortner, H. J.; Lavigne, P. (2007): Institutional analysis in the evaluation of the northwest economic adjustment initiative. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 10 (4), pp. 476–502. doi: 10.1108/IJOTB-10-04-2007-B003
   Google Scholar
• Lai, L.W. C. (1997): Property rights justifications for planning and a theory of zoning. Progress in Planning, 48 (3), pp.161–245. doi: 10.1016/S0305-9006(97)00010-X
   Google Scholar
• Legislative Council Brief (LCB) (2011): Preservation-cum-development of the Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui Compound in Central, Hong Kong. File Ref.: DEVB CS/CR 6/5/274
   Google Scholar
• Li, P. (2008): Transfer of Development Rights Approach: Striking the Balance between Economic Development and Historic Preservation in Hong Kong. Surveying and Built Environment, 19 (1), pp. 38–53.
   Google Scholar
• Machemer, P. L.; Kaplowitz, M. D. (2002): A Framework for Evaluating Transferable Development Rights Programmes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45 (6), 773–795. doi: 10.1080/0964056022000024334
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, V.; Kopits, E.; Walls, M. (2006): Using markets for land preservation: results of a TDR program. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49 (5), pp. 631–651. doi: 10.1080/09640560600849913
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, V.; Walls, M. (2009): Policy monitor U.S. experience with transferable development rights. Review of Environmental Economics & Policy, 3 (2), pp. 288–303. doi: 10.1093/reep/rep008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezias, S. J. (1990): An institutional model of organisational practice: financial reporting at the Fortune 200. Administrative science quarterly, 35 (3), pp. 431–457. doi: 10.2307/2393312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micelli, E. (2002): Development rights markets to manage urban plans in Italy. Urban Studies, 39 (1), pp.141–154. doi: 10.1080/00420980220099122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minton, G. R.; Williams, R.; Murdock, T. (1980): Institutional analysis criteria for water supply planning. Water resources bulletin, 16 (3), pp. 486–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1980.tb03902.x
   Google Scholar
• Musole, M. (2009): Property rights, transaction costs and institutional change: Conceptual framework and literature review. Progress in Planning, 71 (2), pp. 43–85. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C.; Pruetz, R.; Woodruff, D. (2011): The TDR Handbook: Designing and Implementing. Transfer of Development Rights Programs. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990): Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyambod, E. M.; Nazmul, H. (2010): Integrated water resources management and poverty eradication – policy analysis of Bangladesh and Cameroon. Journal of water resource and protection, 2 (3), pp. 191–198. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2010.23021
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990): Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1991): Rational choice theory and institutional analysis: toward complementarity. The American political science review, 85 (1), pp. 237–243. doi: 10.2307/1962888
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005): Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, USA, (E-book ISBN 9781400831739, accessed July 2019: https://books.google.com.hk/books/about/Understanding_Institutional_Diversity.html).
   Google Scholar
• Pizor, P. J. (1978): A review of transfer of development rights. The Appraisal Journal, 46 (3), pp. 386–396.
   Google Scholar
• Prager, K.; Schuler, J.; Helming, K.; Zander, P.; Ratinger, T.; Hagedorn, K. (2011): Soil degradation, farming practices, institutions and policy responses: an analytical framework. Land degradation and development, 22 (1), pp. 32–46. doi: 10.1002/ldr.979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruetz, R. (1997): Saved by development: Preserving environmental areas, farmland and historic landmarks with transfer of development rights. Arje Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pruetz, R.; Pruetz, E. (2007): Transfer of development rights turns 40. Planning & Environmental Law, 59 (6), pp. 3–11. doi: 10.1080/15480755.2007.10394447
   Google Scholar
• Redevelopment of Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui Compound (RHKSKHC): Development Bureau, Hong Kong. Website: http://sc1.devb.gov.hk/TuniS/www.devb.gov.hk/en/issues_in_focus/conserving_central/Redevelopment_of_Hong_Kong_Sheng_Kung_Hui_Compound/index.html (accessed July 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Renard, V. (2007): Property rights and the ‘transfer of development rights’: questions of efficiency and equity. Town Planning Review, 78 (1), pp. 41–60. doi: 10.3828/tpr.78.1.4
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, I. (1997): Policy Design Democracy. Lawrence: University Press Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Shahab, S.; Clinch, J. P.; O’Neill, E. (2018a): Timing and Distributional Aspects of Transaction Costs in Transferable Development Rights Programs. Habitat International, 75, pp.131–138. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahab, S.; Clinch, J. P.; O’Neill, E. (2018b): Accounting for Transaction Costs in Planning Policy Evaluation. Land Use Policy, 70, pp. 263–272. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, M. (2007): Transfer of development rights: a study of its use in other states and the potential for use in Rhode Island.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, L.; Zhu, D.; Chan, E. H.W. (2016): Public participation impact on environment nimby conflict and environmental conflict management: comparative analysis in Shanghai and Hong Kong. Land Use Policy, 58, pp. 208–217. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K.W.; Mokhtar, M. B. (2009): An appropriate institutional framework towards integrated water resources management in Pahang River Basin, Malaysia. European journal of scientific research, 27 (4), pp. 536–547.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gossum, P.; Arts, B.; de Wulf, R.; Verheyen, K. (2011): An institutional evaluation of sustainable forest management in Flanders. Land use policy, 28 (1), pp. 110–123. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan Chai District Council (WCDC) (2014): Preservation-cum-development Proposal for the Residence at 23 Coombe Road (= Information Paper No. 13/2014), Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, K.; Molotch, H. (1995): Power to build: how development persists despite local controls. Urban Affairs Review, 30 (3), pp. 378–406. doi: 10.1177/107808749503000304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2010): Case study research: Design and methods. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Yung, E. H. K.; Chan, E. H.W. (2011): Problem issues of public participation in built-heritage conservation: two controversial cases in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 35 (3), pp. 457–466. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung, E. H. K.; Chan, E. H.W. (2013): Evaluation for the conservation of historic buildings. Facilities, 31 (11/12), pp. 542–564. doi: 10.1108/F-03-2012-0023
   Google Scholar