References
- Abers, R. (2019): Bureaucratic Activism: Pursuing Environmentalism Inside the Brazilian State. Latin American Politics and Society, 61 (2), pp. 21–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2018.75
- Albrechts, L. (2013): Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective. Planning Theory, 12 (1), pp. 46–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212452722
- Albrechts, L. (2015b): Ingredients for a more radical strategic spatial planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 42 (3), pp. 510–525. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/b130104p
- Banaszak, L. A. (2005): Inside and outside the state: Movement insider status, tactics, and public policy achievements. In Meyer, D. S.; Jenness, V.; Ingram, H. (eds.), Routing the opposition. Social movements, public policy, and democracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 149–176.
- Banaszak, L. A. (2010): The Women’s Movement Inside and Outside the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Barnett, C. (2005): The consolations of ‘neoliberalism’. Geoforum, 36 (1), pp.7–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.08.006
- Boelens, L. (2009): The Urban Connection: An actorrelational approach to urban planning. 010 Publishers.
- Boelens, L.; De Roo, G. (2016): Planning of undefined becoming: First encounters of planners beyond the plan. Planning Theory, 15 (1), pp. 42–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214542631
- Boelens, L.; Goethals, M. (2016): Planning tactics of undefined becoming. In Rydin, Y.; Tate, L. (eds.), Actor Networks of Planning: Exploring the Influence of Actor Network Theory. London: Routledge, pp.186–202.
- Boonstra, B.; Boelens, L. (2011): Self-organization in urban development: towards a new perspective on spatial planning. Urban Research & Practice, 4 (2), pp. 99–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2011.579767
- Boonstra, B. (2015): Planning Strategies in an Age of Active Citizenship: A post-structuralist agenda for self-organization in spatial planning. InPlanning (PhD series).
- Callon, M. (1986): Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief, a new sociology of knowledge? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 196–229.
- Davidoff, P. (1965): Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 31(4), pp. 331–338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366508978187
- de Certeau, M. (1984): The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Deleuze G.; Guattari F. (1987): A Thousand Plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia (trans. Massumi, B.). London: Athlone Press.
- Doussard, M. (2015): Equity planning outside city hall: Rescaling advocacy to confront the sources of urban problems. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35 (3), pp. 296–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X15580021
- Duyvendak, J.W.; Jasper, J. (2015): Breaking down the State. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
- Forester, J. (2009): Dealing with differences: Dramas of mediating public disputes. Oxford University Press.
- Forester, J.; Stitzel, D. (1989): Beyond neutrality. Negotiation Journal, 5 (3), pp. 251–264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1989.tb00521.x
- Hillier, J. (2007): Stretching Beyond the Horizon: A Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning and Governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Hillier, J. (2011): Strategic navigation across multiple planes: Towards a Deleuzean-inspired methodology for strategic spatial planning. Town Planning Review, 82 (5), pp. 503–527. doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2011.30
- Innes, J.; Booher, D. (2000): Planning institutions in the network society: theory for collaborative planning. In Salet, W.; Faludi, A. (eds.), The revival of strategic spatial planning. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, pp. 175–189.
- Jessop, B. (1999): The strategic selectivity of the state: Reflections on a theme of Poulantzas. Journal of the Hellenic Diaspora, 25 (1–2), pp. 1–37.
- Jessop, B. (2009): The state and power. In Clegg, S. R.; Haugaard, S. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of power. London: Sage, pp. 367–382.
- Kaethler, M.; De Blust, S.; Devos, T. (2017): Ambiguity as agency: critical opportunists in the neoliberal city. CoDesign, 13 (3), pp.175–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355002
- Krumholz, N. (2013): Toward an equity-oriented planning practice in the United States. Policy, planning, and people: Promoting justice in urban development, pp. 123–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812207965.123
- Latour, B. (2004): Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press.
- Laws, D.; Forester, J. (2015): Conflict, improvisation, governance: Street level practices for urban democracy. Routledge.
- Lowndes, V.; Roberts, M. (2013): Why institutions matter. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Mayer, M. (2003): The onward sweep of social capital: causes and consequences for understanding cities, communities and urban movements. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27, pp.110–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00435
- Moulaert, F.; Parra, C.; Swyngedouw, E. (2014): Cities, neighbourhoods and multiscalar governance in urban Europe. Eure-revista latino latino americana de estudios urbano regionales, 40, pp. 5–24.
- Newman, P. (2008): Strategic spatial planning: Collective action and moments of opportunity. European Planning Studies, 16 (10), pp. 1371–1383. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802420078
- Newman, J. (2011): Mobilising the active citizen in the UK Tensions, silences and erasures. In Newman, J.; Tonkens, E. (eds.), Participation, Responsibility and Choice. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp.127–145.
- Nicholls, W. J.; Uitermark, J. (2016): Introduction: Planning/resistance. Urban Geography, pp.1–9.
- Olsson, J. (2009): The power of the inside activist: Understanding policy change by empowering the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). Planning Theory & Practice, 10 (2), pp.167–187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350902884425
- Olsson, J.; Hysing, E. (2012): Theorizing inside activism: Understanding policymaking and policy change from below. Planning Theory & Practice, 13 (2), pp. 257–273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677123
- Pettinicchio, D. (2012): Institutional activism: Reconsidering the insider/outsider dichotomy. Sociology Compass, 6, pp. 499–510. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00465.x
- Portugali, J. (2000): Self-organization and the city. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
- Rich, J. A. (2013): Grassroots bureaucracy: intergovernmental relations and popular mobilization in Brazil’s AIDS policy sector. Latin American Politics and Society, 55 (2), pp.1–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2013.00191.x
- Sager, T. (2016): Activist planning: A response to the woes of neo-liberalism? European Planning Studies, 24 (7), pp.1262–1280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1168784
- Tilly, C.; Tarrow, S. (2015): Contentious politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Uitermark, J. (2009): An in memoriam for the just city of Amsterdam. City, 13 (2–3), pp. 347–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982813
- Verhoeven, I.; Duyvendak, J.W. (2017): Understanding governmental activism. Social Movement Studies, 16 (5), pp. 564–577.
- Verhoeven, I.; Bröer, C. (2015): Contentious governance. Local governmental players as social movement actors. In Duyvendak, J.W.; Jasper, J. (eds.), Breaking down the state. Protestors engaged. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 95–110.
- Zapata, M. A.; Bates, L. K. (2017): Equity planning or equitable opportunities? The construction of equity in the HUD sustainable communities regional planning grants. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 37 (4), pp. 411–424. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16657874