Knowledge production, critique and peer review in feminist publishing: reflections from Agenda

References

• Alatas, S.F. 2006. Alternative discourses in Asian social science: responses to Eurocentricism. New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ampofo, A.A. and S. Arnfred, eds. 2009. African feminist politics of knowledge: tensions, challenges, possibilities. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2000. The politics of writing. Agenda 46: 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bhana, D. 2013. Introducing love: gender, sexuality and power. Agenda 96: 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2000. Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Code, L. 1991. What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P.H. 1990. Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff, J. and J.L. Comaroff. 2011. Theory from the south: or, how Euro-America is evolving towards Africa. Boulder: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. 2007. Southern theory: the global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. 2014. Using southern theory: decolonizing social thought in theory, research and application. Planning Theory 13(2): 210–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, J. 2004. Adult education and the production of knowledge for politics: praxis and pedagogy in metro network for social justice. Toronto: Ryerson University.
   Google Scholar
• De la Rey, C. 1997. South African feminism, race and racism. Agenda 32: 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Y. 2011. Through the looking glass: publishing in peer-reviewed academic journals. Power and Education 3(1): 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, M. 2002. The paradox of peer review: admitting too much or allowing too little? Research in Science Education 32: 241–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falabella Luco, M.S., R. Marilef and M.R. Maurizi. 2009a. ESE-O workshop. Writing & publishing: keys for social change. Santiago: ESE-O.
   Google Scholar
• Falabella Luco, M.S., M. Maurizi and A. Ramay. 2009b. ESE-O and the Sexualities Project: a critical and feminist methodology for collaborative online work. International Journal of Sexual Health 21(4): 267–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1997. Agenda ‘a labour of love’: ten years of feminist publishing in South Africa. Agenda 34: 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott and M. Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London, Thousand Oaks, India and Singapore: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. 2010. Becoming qualitative researchers: an introduction, 4th edition. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, T.H.P. 2012. Do we still need peer review? An argument for change. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guzana, Z. 2000. Exploring women’s silence in isiXhosa oral and written literature. Agenda 46: 75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Hames, I. 2007. Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals: guidelines for good practice. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1998. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14: 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 2008. Sciences from below: feminisms, postmodernisms and modernisms. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harnad, S. 1982. Peer commentary on peer review: a case study of scientific quality control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschauer, S. 2010. Editorial judgements: a praxeology of ‘voting’ in peer review. Social Studies of Science 40(1): 71–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• hooks, b. 1998. Feminist theory: from margin to centre. London: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. 2000. Feminist theory: from margin to centre, 2nd edition. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hountondji, P.J., ed. 1997. Endogenous knowledge: research trails. Dakar: Codesria.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. 2009 How professors think: inside the curious world of academic judgement. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ligthelm, A.A. and E.M. Koekemoer. 2009. Academic publishing: lessons learnt from the Southern African Business Review. Southern African Business Review 13(3): 28–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, R. 2011. Anonymity in collaboration: anonymous vs. identifiable e-peer review in writing instruction. Bloomington: Trafford.
   Google Scholar
• Macey, D. 2000. The Penguin book of critical theory. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, P. 1996. Considering more feminist participatory research: What’s congruency got to do with it? Qualitative Inquiry 2(1): 106–118.
   Google Scholar
• Mama, A. 2000. Why we must write: personal reflections on linking the alchemy of science with the relevance of activism. Agenda 46: 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, P. 1994. Politics and scholarship: feminist academic journals and the production of knowledge. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meer, S. n.d. Struggles for gender equality: reflections on the place of men and men’s organisations. OSISA Open Debate.
   Google Scholar
• Meer, S. 1997. Feminist agendas in activism and academia – the challenge for Agenda. Agenda 34: 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Millen, D. 1997. Some methodological and epistemological issues raised by doing feminist research on non-feminist women. Sociological Research Online 2(3) http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/3/3.html (accessed 29 May 2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokone, M., R.N. Malema, R.R. Maphanga, M. Tlowane, M. Lesolang, N. Rapetsoa and E. Ramani. 2012. This journey never ends! The University of Limpopo Women’s Academic Solidarity Association experience. Agenda 94: 86–97.
   Google Scholar
• Moletsane, L. and S. Ntombela. 2010. Gender and rurality in Southern African contexts: an introduction. Agenda 84: 4–18.
   Google Scholar
• Moletsane, R. 2012. Repositioning educational research on rurality and rural education in South Africa: beyond deficit paradigms. Perspectives in Education 30(1): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moletsane, R. and N. Lesko. 2004. Overcoming paralysis: AIDS education-and-activism. Agenda 60: 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Moothoo-Payadachie, N. 2008. Constructing South African feminism(s): a case study of Agenda (1987–2007). Master’s dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, C. 2002. Between knowing and imagining: What space for feminism in scholarship on Africa? Feminist Africa 1: 9–33.
   Google Scholar
• Prinsloo, J. 2000. Teaching talk-back: reflections on a workshop for women writing and publication. Agenda 46: 55–58.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. 2000. Coloniality of power and Eurocentricism in Latin America. International Sociology 15(2): 215–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, V. and N. Sanger. 2012. Matters of age: an introduction to ageing, intergenerationality and gender in Africa. Agenda 94: 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shatz, D. 2004. Peer review: a critical inquiry. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B. and T.A. Schwandt, eds. 2007. Knowledge production: research work in interesting times. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spelman, E. 1988. Inessential women: problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunde, J. and V. Bozalek. 1993. (Re)searching difference. Agenda 19: 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Tembe, W. 2004. Gijima-ring to a ‘mind your own’ mentality: a young urban black African woman muses on the contradiction of growing up. Agenda 59: 124–129.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P. and B. Kamler. 2013. Writing for peer reviewed journals: strategies for getting published. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wainaina, B. 2005. How to write about Africa: the view from Africa. Granta 92: 93–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wyllie, C. and C. Davis. 2004. The Agenda writing programme: Where from … where to? Agenda 59: 101–105.
   Google Scholar