Communication for Development in Peacebuilding: directions on research and evaluation for an emerging field

References

• Anderlini, S.N. and J. El-Bushra. 2004. Post-Conflict Reconstruction. In Inclusive Security, Sustainable Peace: a toolkit for advocacy and action, 51–68. Washington D.C. and London: Hunt Alternatives Fund and International Alert.
   Google Scholar
• Arsenault, A., S. Himelfarb and S. Abbott. 2011. Evaluating Media Interventions in Conflict Countries. Toward developing common principles and community of practice. Washington D.C.: United Stated Institute of Peace (USIP). www.usip.org/files/resources/PW77.pdf (accessed 4 August 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Baù, V. 2015a. Building Peace through Social Change Communication: participatory video in conflict-affected communities. Community Development Journal 50(1): 121–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baù, V. 2015b. Participatory Photography for Peace. Using images to open up dialogue after violence. Journal of Peacebuilding and Development 10(3): 74–88.
   Google Scholar
• Beall, J., T. Goodfellow and D. Rodgers. 2013. Cities and Conflict in Fragile States in the Developing World. Urban Studies 50 (15): 3065–3083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CARE. 2012. Peacebuilding with Impact - Defining theories of change. London: CARE International UK. http://www.international-alert.org/sites/default/files/publications/120123CAREDefiningTheoriesChange_FINAL.pdf (accessed 13 February 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. and R. Dawson. 1999. Evaluation Research: an introduction to principles, methods and practice. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• DFID. March 2010. Briefing Paper I: Monitoring and Evaluation. Working Effectively in Conflict-affected and Fragile Situations paper series. London: UK Department for International Development (DFID). http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/documents/DFID_Working_In%20Conflict_Affected_and_Fragile_Sitiuations_Monitoring_and_Evaluation.pdf (accessed 12 April 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Viso, A. 2014. Peace Communication for Social Change: dealing with violent conflict. In The Handbook of Development Communication and Social Change, ed. K.G. Wilkins, T. Tufte and R. Obregon, 259–277. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gujit, I. 2008. Critical Readings on Assessing and Learning from Social Change: a review. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies (IDS). http://www.ids.ac.uk/files/Db21.pdf (accessed 12 September 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Gujit, I. 2007. Assessing and Learning from Social Change: a discussion paper. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies (IDS). http://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/ASClowresfinalversion.pdf (accessed 12 September 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J. 2014. Conceptualising ‘Communication for Peace’. Peacebuilding 2(1): 100–117.
   Google Scholar
• Kalathil, S., J. Langlois and A. Kaplan. 2008. Towards a New Model. Media and communication in post-conflict and fragile states, Washington D.C.: The World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTGOVACC/Resources/CommGAPNewModelWeb.pdf (accessed 10 July 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Lederach, J.P., H. Culbertson, J. Darby, B. Fitzpatrick and S. Hahn. 2007. Reflective Peacebuilding: a planning, monitoring and learning toolkit. Notre Dame: Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame. http://kroc.nd.edu/sites/default/files/reflective_peacebuilding.pdf (accessed 15 September 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Lennie, J. and J. Tacchi. 2013. Evaluating Communication for Development. A framework for social change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, C. 2000. Civil Society and Citizens’ Media. In Redeveloping Communication for Social Change: theory, practice and power, ed. K.G. Wilkins, 147–160. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, C. 2004. Communication for Peace: contrasting approaches, in The Drum Beat 278. http://www.comminit.com/drum_beat_278.html (accessed 17 July 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Search for Common Ground. 2010. Communication for Peacebuilding: practices, trends and challenges. Washington D.C.: Search for Common Ground (SFCG) and United States Institute of Peace (USIP). http://www.usip. org/files/Grants-Fellows/GrantsDownloadsNotApps/CfPeace%20Report_vFINALFORMATTEDPhotosFINALv1Rev2June.pdf (accessed 15 August 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I. 2006. Theories of Practice and Change in Ethnic Conflict Interventions. In The Psychology of Resolving Global Conflict: from war to peace. Volume 3, ed. M. Fitzduff and C.E. Stout, 1–32. Santa Barbara: Preager Security International.
   Google Scholar
• Skuse, A., D. Rodger, G. Power, D. Friguglietti and T. Brimacombe. 2013. Communication for Development Interventions in Fragile States: a systematic review. Canberra: AusAid and the University of Adelaide. https://www.adelaide.edu.au/accru/projects/c4dfragilestates/SR566final.pdf (accessed 7 July 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. and E. Webb. 2011. Acting Out of Conflict: using participatory theater as a tool of peacebuilding in Rwanda. Africa Peace and Conflict Journal 2(2): 66–80.
   Google Scholar
• Smoljan, J. 2003. The Relationship between Peacebuilding and Development. Conflict, Security & Development 3(2): 233–250.
   Google Scholar
• Spadacini, B. 2013. Global Mapping of Communication for Development (C4D) Interventions in Peacebuilding and Conflict Transformation. New York: UNICEF C4D Unit. http://www.unicef.org/cbsc/files/Global_Mapping_C4D_Peacebuilding.pdf (accessed 31 January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. 2008. The Institutional Challenges of Participatory Communication in International Aid. Social Identities 14 (4): 505–522.
   Google Scholar
• Wisler, A. 2013 International Development and Peacebuilding. In Integrated Peacebuilding. Innovative approaches to transforming conflict, ed. C. Zelizer, 57–75. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar