A Script-Based, Parameterized Finite Element Mesh for Design and NDE on a GPU

REFERENCES

• J. R. Shewchuk, “Triangle: Engineering a 2D quality mesh generator and delaunay triangulator,” Workshop on Applied Computational Geometry: Towards Geometric Engingrng, New York, May 27–28, 1996, pp. 203–22.
   Google Scholar
• J. R. Shewchuk, “Delaunay refinement algorithms for triangular mesh generation,” Comput. Geom., Vol. 22, no. 1–3, pp. 21–74, May 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Schöberl, “NETGEN an advancing front 2D/3D-mesh generator based on abstract rules,” Comput. Vis. Sci., Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–52, Jul. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• The CGAL Project, “CGAL user and reference manual,” Vol. 4.2, France: CGAL Project, INRIA, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• C. Geuzaine, and J.-C. Remacle, “Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre and post-processing facilities,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., Vol 79, no. 11, pp. 1309–1331, Sep. 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. J. Conroy, E. J. Kubatko, and D. W. West, “ADMESH: An advanced, automatic unstructured mesh generator for shallow water models,” Ocean Dyn., Vol. 62, no. 10–12, pp. 1503–17, Nov. 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Chen, J. Johnson, and R. W. Dutton, A Vector Level Control Function for Generalized Octree Mesh Generation. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• X. W. Ma, G. Q. Zhao, and L. Sun, “AUTOMESH-2D/3D: Robust automatic mesh generator for metal forming simulation,” Mater. Res. Innov., Vol. 15, no. s1, pp. s482–6, Feb. 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Bastiaans, “Design optimization of the double glass problem; Application and limitations of CFD” Int. J. Eng. Educ., Vol. 25, no. 6, p. 1105–1113, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. U. Karthik, S. Sivasuthan, and S. R. H. Hoole, “Parallel implementation of the genetic algorithm on NVIDIA GPU architecture for synthesis and inversion,” in AIP QNDE Conference Proceedings 1581, Baltimore, MD, 2014, pp. 1991–8.
   Google Scholar
• S. R. H. Hoole, K. Weeber, and S. Subramaniam, “Fictitious minima of object functions, finite element meshes, and edge elements in electromagnetic device synthesis,” IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 5214–6, Nov. 1991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Krishnakumar, and S. R. H. Hoole, “A common algorithm for various parametric geometric changes in finite element design sensitivity computation,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol. 161, no. 1–2, pp. 368–73, Apr. 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Khamsen, A. Aurasopon, and W. Sangiamvibool, “Power factor improvement and voltage harmonics reduction in pulse width modulation AC chopper using bee colony optimization,” IETE Tech. Rev., Vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 173–182, May–Jun. 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Sivasuthan, V. U. Karthik, and S. R. H. Hoole, “CUDA memory limitation in finite element optimization to reconstruct cracks,” in AIP QNDE Conference Proceedings 1581, Baltimore, MD, 2014, pp. 1967–74.
   Google Scholar
• B. Duan, and Y. Yang, “A development summarization of the power semiconductor devices II,” IETE Tech. Rev., Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 36–43, Jan–Feb. 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.-D. Müller, “On triangles and flow,” Spec. Sect. S.w. Agents Electron, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• H. Si, “TetGen, a quality tetrahedral mesh generator and three-dimensional Delaunay triangulator, 2007,” Available: http://web.mit.edu/tetgen_v1.4.1/tetgen-manual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• B. Joe, “Construction of three-dimensional improved-quality triangulations using local transformations,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., Vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1292–307, Nov. 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Niu, Y. Zhao, S. L. Ho, and W. N. Fu, “A parameterized mesh technique for finite element magnetic field computation and its application to optimal designs of electromagnetic devices,” IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 2943–6, Oct. 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available: http://www.jaewoo.com/material/magazinefolder/jwnews/0710/10_New_Features.pdf
   Google Scholar
• J. Xin, N. Lei, L. Udpa, and S. S. Udpa, “Nondestructive inspection using rotating magnetic field eddy-current probe,” IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1070–3, May 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEDRAT Corp., “FLUX 10: 2D and 3D Applications – New Features,” Meylan, France: CEDRAT Corp, Jul. 2007. Available: http://www.cedrat.com/en/software/got-it.html
   Google Scholar
• L. Chen, J. Wang, P. Lazari, and V. Leconte, “High-efficiency motor design for electric vehicles,” Proceedings of Flux Conference, Rome, Italy, Oct. 17–18, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• J.-L. Coulomb, “Project FORGE MAG,” Grenoble, France: INPG, 2009. Available: http://forge-mage.g2elab.grenoble-inp.fr/project/got
   Google Scholar
• A. Vaidya, S. H. Yu, J. St. Ville, D. T. Nguyen, and S. D. Rajan, “Multiphysics CAD-based design optimization,” Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach., Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 157–80, Jul. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• C. Talischi, G. H. Paulino, A. Pereira, and I. F. M. Menezes, “PolyTop: A Matlab implementation of a general topology optimization framework using unstructured polygonal finite element meshes,” Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim., Vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 329–57, Jan. 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Sivasuthan, “The general purpose parameter based two dimensional mesh generator,” in Proceedings of the ASEE-NCS2014, Oakland, CA: Oakland University, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• O. Pironneau, Optimal Shape Design for Elliptic Systems. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• S. Subramaniam, A. A. Arkadan, and S. R. H. Hoole, “Optimization of a magnetic pole face using linear constraints to avoid jagged contours,” IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 3455–8, Sep. 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Haslinger, and P. Neittaanmäki, Finite Element Approximation for Optimal Shape, Material and Topology Design, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• K. Preis, C. Magele, and O. Biro, “FEM and evolution strategies in the optimal design of electromagnetic devices,” IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 2181–3, Sep. 1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Wijesinghe, “The first general purpose optimization software for electromagnetic device optimization,” An. Trans. IESL, pp. 141–49, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• V. U. Karthik, S. Sivasuthan, A. Rahunanthan, R. S. Thyagarajan, P. Jayakumar, L. Udpa, and S. R. H. Hoole, “Faster, more accurate parallelized inversion for shape optimization in electroheat problems on a graphics processing unit (GPU) with the real-coded genetic algorithm,” COMPEL, Vol. 34, no. 1, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Sivasuthan, V. U. Karthik, A. Rahunanthan, R. S. Thyagarajan, P. Jayakumar, L. Udpa, and S. R. H. Hoole, “A script-based, parameterized mesh generator library for the design of coupled field systems as well as for non-destructive evaluation,” in Digests of 16th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation, Annecy, France, May 25–28, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• D. Robilliard, V. Marion-Poty, and C. Fonlupt, “Genetic programming on graphics processing units,” Genet. Program. Evolvable Mach., Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 447–71, Oct. 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. L. Wong, and T. T. Wong, “Implementation of parallel genetic algorithms on graphics processing units,” Intell Evol Syst Stud Comput Intel., Vol. 187, pp. 197–216, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• S. R. H. Hoole, S. Sivasuthan, V. U. Karthik, A. Rahunanthan, R. S. Thyagarajan, and P. Jayakumar, “Electromagnetic device optimization: The forking of already parallelized threads on graphics processing units,” ACES J. Vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 677–684, Sept. 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. F. Herzberg, D. A. Forman, N. T. O’Meara, and J. C. Tran, “The annual cost of corrosion for army ground vehicles,” Rep. MEC81T1, McLean, VA: LMI Government Consultants, May 2009.
   Google Scholar
• BDM Federal Inc, “Corrosion detection technologies,” Sector Study, McLean, VA: BDM Federal Inc., 1998.
   Google Scholar
• K. Weeber, and S. R. H. Hoole, “Geometric parametrization and constrained optimization techniques in the design of salient pole synchronous machines,” IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1948–60, Jul. 1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. R. H. Hoole, V. U. Karthik, S. Sivasuthan, A. Rahunanthan, R. S. Thyagarajan, and P. Jayakumar, “Finite elements, design optimization, and nondestructive evaluation: A review in magnetics, and future directions in GPU-based, element-by-element coupled optimization and NDE,” Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech., 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Available: http://www.egr.msu.edu/~hoole/FE2DMesh
   Google Scholar
• M. Bashir, M. Abd Latiff, A. Ahmed, A. Yousif, and M. Eltayeeb, “Content-based information retrieval techniques based on grid computing: A review,” IETE Tech. Rev., Vol. 30, no. 3, p. 223–232, May/Jun. 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar