Deploying IPv4-only Connectivity across Local IPv6-only Access Networks

REFERENCES

• S. Deering and R. Hinden, “IP Version 6 addressing architecture,” Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 4291, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• A. Hamarsheh and M. Goossens, “A Review: Breaking the deadlocks for transition to IPv6,” IETE Technical Review, Vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 405–21, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Hamarsheh and M. Goossens, “Illustrating the impediments for widespread deployment of IPv6,” in Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Telecommunications and Informatics, Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Signal Processing, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• J. Davies, Understanding IPv6. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• S. Hagen, IPv6 Essentials. O’Reilly Media, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• M. Blanchet, Migrating to IPv6: A Practical Guide to Implementing IPv6 in Mobile and Fixed Networks. Wiley, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• A. Jansen and W. Henderickx, “Transition to IPv6 in wireline environments,” J. Inst. Telecommun. Prof., Vol. 5, pp. 16–21, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• T. Yapeng, L. Zhenqiang, and W. Bing, “Analysis of IPv6 transition technologies,” Telecommun. Sci., Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 52–60, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• E. Nordmark and R. Gilligan, “Basic transition mechanisms for IPv6 hosts and routers,” Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 4213, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• W. Hongzhi and S. Zunyi, “Comparison between IPv4 and IPv6 and transition strategy,” Sci. Technol. Rev., Vol. 29, no. 24, pp. 77–9, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• A. Hamarsheh, M. Goossens, and R. Alasem, “Decoupling application IPv4/IPv6 operation from the underlying IPv4/IPv6 communication (DAC),” Lond. Engl. Am. J. Sci. Res., Vol. 1, no. 14, pp. 101–21, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• R. Despres, “IPv6 rapid deployment on IPv4 infrastructures (6rd),” Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 5569, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• W. Townsley and O. Troan, “IPv6 rapid deployment on IPv4 infrastructures (6rd) – protocol specification,” Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 5969, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• A. Hamarsheh, M. Goossens, and R. Alasem, “Deploying IPv6 service across local IPv4 access networks,” in Proceedings of The 10th WSEAS International Conference on TELECOMMUNICATIONS and INFORMATICS (TELE-INFO ‘11), The ACM Digital Library, Lanzarote, Canary Islands, Spain, May 27–29, 2011, pp. 94–100.
   Google Scholar
• A. Hamarsheh and M. Goossens, “Exploiting local IPv4-only access networks to deliver IPv6 service to end-users,” Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control, Vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 169–77, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• M. Bagnulo, P. Matthews, and I. van Beijnum, “Stateful NAT64: Network address and protocol translation from IPv6 clients to IPv4 servers,” Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 6146, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• M. Bagnulo, A. Sullivan, P. Matthews, and I. Beijnum, “DNS64: DNS extensions for network address translation from IPv6 clients to IPv4 servers,” Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 6147, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• A. Hamarsheh, M. Goossens, and A. Al-Qerem, “Assuring interoperability between heterogeneous (IPv4/IPv6) networks without using protocol translation,” IETE Tech. Rev., Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 114–29, 2012. doi: 10.4103/0256-4602.95384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Tsirtsis and P. Srisuresh, “Network Address Translation – Protocol Translation (NAT-PT),” Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 2766, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• C. Aoun and E. Davies, “Reasons to move the Network Address Translator – Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) to historic status,” Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 4966, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• A. Hamarsheh, M. Goossens, and R. Alasem, “AIN-SLT: Assuring interoperability between heterogeneous networks (IPv4/IPv6) using socket-layer translator,” Am. J. Sci. Res., Vol. 1, no. 15, pp. 33–43, published by EuroJournals Publishing, Inc., London, England 2011.
   Google Scholar
• D. Guo, S. Jiang, R. Despres, and R. Maglione, “RADIUS attribute for IPv6 rapid deployment on IPv4 infrastructures (6rd),” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 6930, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• A. Hamarsheh, M. Goossens, and R. Alasem, “Configuring hosts to auto-detect (IPv6, IPv6-in-IPv4, or IPv4) network connectivity,” KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst., Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1230–51, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• R. Bush, “The Address plus Port (A+P) Approach to the IPv4 address shortage,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC 6346, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Fu, S. Jiang, J. Dong, and Y. Chen, “Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite) Management Information Base (MIB) for Address Family Transition Routers (AFTRs),” Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 7870, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• M. Boucadair, C. Jacquenet, and S. Sivakumar, “A YANG data model for the DS-Lite,” Internet Engineering Task Force, Work in Progress, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• F. Baker, X. Li, C. Bao, and K. Yin, “Framework for IPv4/IPv6 translation,” Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 6144, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ford, M. Boucadair, A. Durand, P. Levis, and P. Roberts, “Issues with IP address sharing,” Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 6269, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• G. G. Lorente, B. Lemmens, M. Carlier, A. Braeken, and K. Steenhaut, “BMRF: Bidirectional multicast RPL forwarding,” Ad Hoc Netw., Vol. 54, pp. 69–84, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2016.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Storer, et al., “Softwire hub and spoke deployment framework with Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Version 2 (L2TPv2),” Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 5571, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Lee, R. Maglione, C. Williams, C. Jacquenet, and M. Boucadair, “Deployment considerations for dual-stack lite,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 6908, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• R. Despres, S. Jiang, R. Penno, Y. Lee, G. Chen, and M. Chen, “IPv4 residual deployment via IPv6 – a stateless solution (4rd),” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 7600, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• M. A. Kafi, J. B. Othman, L. Mokdad, and N. Badache, “Performance analysis and evaluation of REFIACC using queuing networks,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Vol. 71, pp. 15–26, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Metzger, E. Liotou, C. Moldovan, and T. Hoßfeld, “TCP video streaming and mobile networks: Not a love story, but better with context,” Computer Networks, Vol. 109, Part 2, pp. 246–56, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2016.06.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “OMNeT++ Network Simulation Framework”. Available: http://www.omnetpp.org.
   Google Scholar
• “ReaSE – Realistic Simulation Environments for OMNeT++”. Available: https://projekte.tm.uka.de/trac/ReaSE.
   Google Scholar