Constancy and Variability: Dialogic Literacy Events as Sites for Improvisation in Two 3rd-Grade Classrooms

REFERENCES

• Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. York, England: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Almasi, J. F., O’Flahavan, J. F., & Arya, P. (2001). A comparative analysis of student and teacher development in more and less proficient discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(2), 96–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aukerman, M. (2007). When reading it wrong is getting it right: Shared evaluation pedagogy amongst struggling fifth grader readers. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1), 56–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzara, C. D. (2002). Improvisation. In R. Colwell & C. P. Richardson (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 171–187). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker-Sennett, J., Matusov, E., & Rogoff, B. (1992). Sociocultural processes of creative planning in children’s playcrafting. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing (pp. 93–114). Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Bellack, A., Kliebard, H., Hyman, R., & Smith, F. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, P. F. (1994). Thinking in jazz. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, M., & Galda, L. (2011). Real talk in elementary schools: Effective oral language practice. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, M., & Rubin, D. (2002). Elaborated student talk in an elementary ESoL classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 36(4), 495–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M., & Rubin, D. (2006). How contingent questioning promotes extended student talk: A function of display questions. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(2), 141–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. P., & Markarian, W. (2011). Dialogic teaching: Talk in service of a dialogic stance. Language and Education, 25(6), 515–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. (2008). Metaphors in qualitative research: Shedding light or casting shadows? Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 274–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoph, J. N., & Nystrand, M. (2001). Taking risks, negotiating relationships: One teacher’s transition toward a dialogic classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 36, 249–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B. (2004). Inventions of teaching: A genealogy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G., & Hoffman, J. (1999). In pursuit of an illusion: The flawed search for a perfect method. The Reading Teacher, 53(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1982). Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships between academic task structure and social participation structure in lessons. In L. C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Communicating in the classroom (pp. 119–158). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fecho, B. (2011). Teaching for the students: Habits of heart, mind and practice in the engaged classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fecho, B., & Botzakis, S. (2007). Feasts of becoming: Imagining a literacy classroom based on dialogic beliefs. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(7), 548–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon, W. S. (2006). Collective improvisation: A theoretical lens for classroom observation. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 3(1), 104–136.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. (2004). Choice words: How our language affects children’s learning. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. E., & Massad, M. (2010). Peer-to-peer talk about newspaper articles: Supporting knowledge and comprehension of an authentic informational genre. Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 59, 75–89.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. E., & Massad, M. (2014). Facilitating peer discourse to support third graders’ comprehension of the news. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 49(2), 11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kemfeld, B. (1995). What to listen for in jazz. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lobel, A. (1980). Fables. Mexico City, Mexico: Harper Trophy.
   Google Scholar
• Marsalis, W. (2008). Moving to higher ground. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). “What time is it Denise?”: Asking knowing information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, 1(6), 89–91.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Milstein, J. (Director). (1997). Wynton Marsalis [Television series episode]. In David Paradine Television (Producer), Talking with David Frost. New York, NY: PBS.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(1), 132–141.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, M. N., & Bridges-Rhoads, S. (2012). Overly scripted: Exploring the impact of a scripted literacy curriculum on a preschool teacher’s instructional practices in mathematics. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 26, 308–324.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. A. (2012). Adaptive teaching in literacy instruction: Case studies of two teachers. Journal of Literacy Research, 44, 149–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renshaw, P. (2004). Dialogic teaching, learning and instruction: Theoretical roots and analytical frameworks. In J. Van der Linden & P. Renshaw (Eds.), Dialogic learning: Shifting perspectives to learning, instruction, and teaching (pp. 1–15). London, England: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Santori, D. (2008). “Sense-making—the heart of the matter”: Exploring reading comprehension in various participation structures (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Santori, D. (2011). “Search for the answers” or “Talk about the story”?: School-based literacy participation structures. Language Arts, 88(3), 198–207.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. R. (2003). Improvised dialogues: Emergence and creativity in conversation. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. R. (2011). What makes good teachers great? The artful balance of structure and improvisation. In K. R. Sawyer (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., & Higgins, S. (2006). Opening classroom interaction: The importance of feedback. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(4), 485–502.
   Google Scholar