References
- Barker, L. J., & Aspray, W. (2006). The state of research on girls and IT. In J. M. Cohoon & W. Aspray (Eds.), Women and information technology (pp. 3–54). The MIT Press.
- Bouygues, H. L. (2019). Does educational technology help students learn? An analysis of the connection between digital devices and learning. Retrieved June 12, 2020, from https://reboot-foundation.org/wp-content/uploads/_docs/ED_TECH_ANALYSIS.pdf
- Bui, D. C., Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (2013). Note-taking with computers: Exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030367
- Carter, S. P., Greenberg, K., & Walker, M. S. (2017). The impact of computer usage on academic performance: Evidence from a randomized trial at the United States Military Academy. Economics of Education Review, 56, 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.12.005
- Colley, A., & Comber, C. (2010). Age and gender differences in computer use and attitudes among secondary school students: What has changed? Educational Research, 45(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188032000103235
- Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
- CwnEnvironment. (2012). The Black Death - Worst plague in history. Retrieved February 1, 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kScxc9DPrnY
- Department for Education. (2013). The national curriculum in England. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739185200191
- Department for Education. (2018). New technology to spearhead classroom revolution. Retrieved February 1, 2019, from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-technology-to-spearhead-classroom-revolution
- Facer, K., Joiner, R., Stanton, D., Reid, J., Hull, R., & Kirk, D. (2004). Savannah: Mobile gaming and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(6), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00105.x
- Glass, A. L., & Kang, M. (2018). Dividing attention in the classroom reduces exam performance. Educational Psychology, 39(3), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1489046
- Habgood, M. P., & Ainsworth, S. E. (2011). Motivating children to learn effectively: Exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 169–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.508029
- Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2003). The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940852
- Hennessy, S. (2011). The role of digital artefacts on the interactive whiteboard in supporting classroom dialogue. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(6), 463–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00416.x
- Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327
- Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319(5865), 966–968. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152408
- Kay, R., Benzimra, D., & Li, J. (2017). Exploring factors that influence technology-based distractions in bring your own device classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(7), 974–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117690004
- Kiewra, K. (1983). The process of review: A levels of processing approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(4), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90023-1
- Kiewra, K. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2001_4
- Lammas Science. (2012). Science in action cells S108LS03. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UD6G1OOIabo
- Lechuga, M. T., Ortega-Tudela, J. M., & Gómez-Ariza, C. J. (2015). Further evidence that concept mapping is not better than repeated retrieval as a tool for learning from texts. Learning and Instruction, 40, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.08.002
- Luckin, R., Bligh, B., Manches, A., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C., & Noss, R. (2012). Decoding learning: The proof, promise and potential of digital education. https:media.nesta.org.uk/documents/decoding_learning_report.pdf
- Luo, L., Kiewra, K., Flanigan, A. E., & Peteranetz, M. S. (2018). Laptop versus longhand note taking: Effects on lecture notes and achievement. Instructional Science, 46(6), 947–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9458-0
- Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2019). How much mightier is the pen than the keyboard for note-taking? A replication and extension of Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014). Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 753–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09468-2
- Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Blasiman, R., & Hollis, R. B. (2019). Note-taking habits of 21st century college students: Implications for student learning, memory, and achievement. Memory, 27(6), 807–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1569694
- Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581
- Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2018). Corrigendum to: The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking (Psychological Science, (2014), 25(6), (1159-1168), 10.1177/0956797614524581). Psychological Science, 29(9), 1565–1568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618781773
- Palmatier, R. A., & Bennet, J. M. (1974). Notetaking habits of college students. Journal of Reading, 18(3), 215–218. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40009958
- Patterson, R. W., & Patterson, R. M. (2017, April). Computers and productivity: Evidence from laptop use in the college classroom. Economics of Education Review, 57, 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.02.004
- Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1086
- Ragan, E., Jennings, S. R., Massey, J. D., & Doolittle, P. E. (2014, September). Unregulated use of laptops over time in large lecture classes. Computers and Education, 78, 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.002
- Reddington, L., Peverly, S. T., & Block, C. J. (2015). An examination of some of the cognitive and motivation variables related to gender differences in lecture note-taking. Reading and Writing, 28(8), 1155–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9566-z
- Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
- Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2018). Reflections on the resurgence of interest in the testing effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617718873
- RonRbc. (2011). Teacher resource: The Black Death. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJfVmGQNM5Y
- Russell, H. (2015). Signing off: Finnish schools phase out handwriting classes. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/31/finnish-schools-phase-out-handwriting-classes-keyboard-skills-finland
- Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers and Education, 62, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003
- Sanders, J. (2006). Gender and technology: A research review. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds.), Handbook of gender and education (pp. 1–40). Sage Publications.
- Shapiro, T. R. (2013). Cursive handwriting is disappearing from public schools. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/cursive-handwriting-disappearing-from-public-schools/2013/04/04/215862e0-7d23-11e2-a044-676856536b40_story.html
- U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 national education technology plan update. Office of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637498108430973