The effect of nitrogen and sulphur on the grain yield and quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) grown in the Western Cape, South Africa

References

• Abdallah M, Dubousset L, Meuriot F, Etienne P, Avice JC, Ourry A. 2010. Effect of mineral sulphur availability on nitrogen and sulphur uptake and remobilization during the vegetative growth of Brassica napus L. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 2635–2646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad G, Jan A, Arif M, Jan MT, Khattak RA. 2007. Influence of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization on quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) under rainfed conditions. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B 8: 731–737.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al-Barrak KM. 2006. Irrigation interval and nitrogen level effects on growth and yield of canola (Brassica napus L.). Scientific Journal of King Faisal University 7: 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• Angadi SV, Cutforth HW, McConkry BG, Gan Y. 2003. Yield adjustment by canola in different plant populations under semi-arid conditions. Crop Science 43: 1358–1366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri H, Shahzad J. 2011. Study of drought stress on agronomic traits of winter canola (Brassica napus L.). Scientific Research and Essays 25: 5285–5289.
   Google Scholar
• Balint T, Rengel Z, Allen D. 2008. Australia canola germplasm differs in nitrogen and sulphur efficiency. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research 59: 167–174.
   Google Scholar
• Breennon RF, Bolland MDA. 2008. Significant nitrogen by sulphur interactions occurred for canola grain production and oil concentration in grain on sandy soils in the Mediterranean-type climate of South-western Australia. Journal of Plant Nutrition 31: 1174–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cataldo DA, Haroon H, Schrader LE, Young VL. 1975. Rapid colorometric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitrate of salicylic acid. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 6: 71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champolivier L, Merrien M. 1996. Effects of water stress applied at different stages to Brassica napus L. var. oleifera on yield, yield components and seed quality. European Journal of Agronomy 5: 153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries). 2012. Monthly Food Security Bulletin of South Africa: January 2012. Available at http://www.nda.agric.za/docs/Cropsestimates/RSA%20Food%20Security%20Bulletin%20JAN%202012.pdf [accessed 26 March 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Daku L, Peshin R, Norton GW, Taylor DB. 2012. Economic impact of oilseed IPM programs. In: Gupta SK (eds), Technological innovation in major world oil crops, vol. 2: Perspectives. Springer: New York. pp 175–208.
   Google Scholar
• Gan Y, Malhi SS, Brandt S, Katepa-Mupondwa F, Stevenson C. 2008. Nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen uptake of juncea canola under diverse environments. Agronomy Journal 100: 285–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy MB, Hanekom D, Langenhoven W. 2004. Yield and quality of canola as affected by cultivar and nitrogen content. Canolafokus no. 24.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan FU, Abdul M, Ghulam Q, Basra SMA. 2007. Effects of sulphur on seed yield, oil, protein and glucosinolates of canola cultivars. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 9: 504–508.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking PJ, Randall PJ, Demarco D. 1997. The response of dry land canola to nitrogen fertiliser: partitioning and mobilization of dry matter and nitrogen, and nitrogen effects on yield components. Field Crops Research 54: 201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson GD. 2000. Effects of nitrogen and sulphur on canola yield and nutrient uptake. Agronomy Journal 92: 44–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan A, Ahmad G, Arif M, Jan MT, Khan BM. 2010. Quality parameters of canola as affected by nitrogen and sulphur fertilisation. Journal of Plant Nutrition 33: 381–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan A, Khan N, Khan IA, Khattak B. 2002. Chemical composition of canola as affected by nitrogen and sulphur. Asian Journal of Plant Science 1: 519–521.
   Google Scholar
• Janzen HH, Bettany JR. 1984. Sulfur nutrition of rapeseed. 1. Influence of fertiliser nitrogen and sulfur rates. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48: 100–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney DR, Nelson DW. 1982. Nitrogen: inorganic forms. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds), Methods of soil analysis. Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties (2nd edn). Madison: American Society of Agronomy. pp 643–698.
   Google Scholar
• Malhi SS, Gan Y, Raney JP. 2007. Yield, seed quality, and sulphur uptake of Brassica oilseed crops in response to sulphur fertilisation. Agronomy Journal 99: 570–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath SP, Zhao FJ. 1996. Sulphur uptake, yield responses and the interactions between nitrogen and sulphur in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science 126: 53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendham NJ, Salisbury PA. 1995. Physiology, crop development, growth and yield. In: Kimber DS, McGregor DI (eds), Brassica oilseeds: production and utilization. Wallingford: CAB International. pp 11–64.
   Google Scholar
• Ngezimana W, Agenbag GA. 2013. Effects of nitrogen and sulphur on canola (Brassica napus L.) vegetative and reproductive growth under controlled conditions. African Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 4887–4894.
   Google Scholar
• Oplinger ES, Hardman LL, Gritton ET, Doll JD, Kelling KA. 2000. Canola (rapeseed). Alternative Field Crops Manual. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension; St Paul: University of Minnesota, Center for Alternative Plants and Animal Products and the Minnesota Extension Service.
   Google Scholar
• Peverill KI, Sparrow LA, Reuter DJ. 1999. Soil analysis: an interpretation manual. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner PL. 2002. Canola: an emerging oilseed crop. In: Janick J, Whipkey A (eds), Trends in new crops and new uses. Alexandria, Virginia: ASH Press. pp 122–126.
   Google Scholar
• Rowell DL. 1994. Soil science: methods and applications. Harlow: Longman Scientific and Technical.
   Google Scholar
• Svečnjak Z, Rengel Z. 2006. Canola cultivars differ in nitrogen utilization efficiency at vegetative stage. Field Crops Research 97: 221–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar