214
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Effects of short-term water deficit stress on physiological characteristics of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.)

, &
Pages 51-58 | Received 27 Nov 2013, Accepted 02 May 2015, Published online: 15 Oct 2015

References

  • Bajji M, Kinet JM, Lutts S. 2001. The use of the electrolyte leakage method for assessing cell membrane stability as a water stress tolerance test in durum wheat. Plant Growth Regulation 36: 61–70.
  • Baker NR. 2008. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosyn- thesis in vivo. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59: 89–113.
  • Barrs HD, Weatherly PE. 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity techniques for estimating water deficit in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 15: 413–428.
  • Bartels D, Ramanjulu S. 2006. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 24: 23–58.
  • Basu S, Mayes S, Davey M, Roberts JA, Azam-Ali SN, Mithen R, Pasquet RS. 2007b. Inheritance of ‘domestication’ traits in Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.). Euphytica 157: 59–68.
  • Basu S, Roberts JA, Azam-Ali SN, Mayes S. 2007a. Development of microsatellite markers for Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) – an underutilised African legume crop species. Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 1326–1328.
  • Bates LS, Waldrenand RP, Teare ID. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205–207.
  • Berchie JN, Opoku M, Adu-Dapaah H, Agyemang A, Sarkodie-Addo J, Asare E, Addo J, Akuffo H. 2012. Evaluation of five Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranean (L.) Verdc.) landraces to heat and drought stress at Tono-Navrongo, Upper East Region of Ghana. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7: 250–256.
  • Bhaskaran S, Smith RH, Newton RJ. 1985. Physiological changes in cultured sorghum cells in response to induced water stress. I. Free proline. Plant Physiology 79: 266–269.
  • Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS. 2003. Understanding plant responses to drought: from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology 30: 239–264.
  • Collinson ST, Berchie J, Azam-Ali SN. 1999. The effect of soil moisture on light interception and the conversion coefficient for three landraces of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea). Journal of Agricultural Science 133:151–157.
  • Collinson ST, Clawson EJ, Azam-Ali SN, Black CR. 1997. Effects of soil moisture deficits on the water relations of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.). Journal of Experimental Botany 48: 877–884.
  • Cornic G,Ghashghaie J, Genty B, Briantais JM. 1992. Leaf photosyn- thesis is resistant to a mild drought stress. Photosynthetica 27: 295–309.
  • Da Costa RCL, Lobato AKS, da Silveira JAG, Laughinghouse IV HD. 2011. ABA-mediated proline synthesis in cowpea leaves exposed to water deficiency and rehydration. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 35: 309–317.
  • DaCosta M, Huang B. 2007. Changes in antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation for bentgrass species in response to drought stress. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 132: 319–326.
  • Ellis RH, Summerfield RJ, Edmeades GO, Roberts EH. 1992. Photoperiod, temperature, and the interval from sowing to tassel initiation in diverse cultivars of maize. Crop Science 32: 1225–1232.
  • Gibon Y, Ronan S, Larher F. 2000. Proline accumulation in canola leaf discs subjected to osmotic stress is related to the loss of chlorophylls and to the decrease of mitochondrial activity. Physiologia Plantarum 110: 469–476.
  • Gomes FP, Oliva MA, Mielke MS, Almeida AAF, Aquino LA. 2010. Osmotic adjustment, proline accumulation and cell membrane stability in leaves of Cocos nucifera submitted to drought stress. Scientia Horticulturae 126: 379–384.
  • Hassanzadeh M, Ebadi A, Panahyan-e-Kivi M, Eshghi AG, Jamaati-e-Somarin S, Seidi M, Zabihi-e-Mahmoodabad R. 2009. Evaluation of drought stress on relative water content and chloro- phyll content of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) genotypes at early flowering stage. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences 3: 345–350.
  • Jorgensen ST, Liu F, Ouedrago M, Ntundu WH, Sarrazin J, Christiansen JL. 2010. Drought responses of two Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L Verdc.) landraces collected from a dry and humid area of Africa. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 196: 412–422.
  • Linnemann AR, Azam-Ali SN. 1993. Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea). In: Williams JT (ed.), Underutilised crops: pulses and vegetables. London: Chapman and Hall. pp 13–57.
  • Liu F, Stutzel H. 2004. Biomass partitioning, specific leaf area, and water use efficiency of vegetable amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) in response to drought stress. Scientia Horticulturae 102: 15–27.
  • Lutts S, Majerus V, Kinet JM. 1999. NaCl effects on proline metabolism in rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings. Physiologia Plantarum 105: 450–458.
  • Lutts S, Kinet JM, Bouharmont J. 1996. NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salinity resistance. Annals of Botany 78: 389–398.
  • Mabhaudhi T, Modi AT. 2013. Growth, phonological and yield responses of a Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.)Verdc.) landrace to imposed water stress under field conditions. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 30: 69–79.
  • Marshall B, Biscoe PV. 1980. A model for C3 leaves describing the dependence of net photosynthesis on irradiance II. Application to the analysis of flag leaf photosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 31: 41–48.
  • Massawe FJ, Mwale SS, Azam-Ali SN, Roberts JA. 2005. Breeding in Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.): strategic considerations. African Journal of Biotechnology 4: 463–471.
  • Mwale SS, Azam-Ali SN, Massawe FJ. 2007a. Growth and development of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) in response to soil moisture 1. Dry matter and yield. European Journal of Agronomy 26: 345–353.
  • Mwale SS, Azam-Ali SN, Massawe FJ. 2007b. Growth and development of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) in response to soil moisture 2. Resource capture and conversion. European Journal of Agronomy 26: 354–362.
  • Nunes C, Araújo SS, Silva JM, Fevereiro P, Silva AB. 2009. Photosynthesis light curves: a method for screening water deficit resistance in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Annals of Applied Biology 155: 321–332.
  • Padmavaghi TAV, Rao DM. 2013. Differential accumulation of osmolytes in four cultivars of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under drought stress. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 16: 151–159.
  • Poorter H, Remkes C. 1990. Leaf area ratio and net assimilation of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Oecologia. 83: 553–559.
  • Premachandra GS, Saneoka H, Fujita K, Ogata S. 1990. Cell membrane stability and leaf water relations as affected by nitrogen nutrition under water stress in maize. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 36: 653–659.
  • Ray JD, Sinclair TR. 1998. The effect of pot size on growth and transpiration of maize and soybean during water deficit stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 49:1381–1386.
  • Rehman S, Harris PJC, Ashraf M. 2005. Stress environments and their impact on crop production. In: Ashraf M, Harris PJC (eds), Abiotic stresses: plant resistance through breeding and molecular approaches. New York: Food Products Press. pp 3–18.
  • Schonfeld MA, Johnson RC, Carwer BF, Mornhinweg DW. 1988. Water relations in winter wheat as drought resisitance indicators. Crop Science 28: 526–531.
  • Sharp RE. 1990. Comparative sensitivity of root and shoot growth and physiology to low water potentials. In: Davies WJ, Jeffcoat B (eds), Importance of root-to-shoot communication in the response to environmental stress. Monograph – British Society for Plant Growth Regulation 21. Bristol: BristolBritish Society for Plant Growth Regulation. pp 29–44.
  • Taiz L, Zeiger E. 2002. Plant physiology (3rd edn). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
  • Tamayo PR, Bonjoch NP. 2003. Free proline quantification. In: Reigosa Roger MJ (ed.), Handbook of plant ecophysiology techniques. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp 365–382.
  • Thornley JHM, Johnson IR. 1990. Plant and crop modelling: a mathematical approach to plant and crop physiology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Turner NC. 1996. Further progress in crop water relations. Advances in Agronomy 58: 293–338.
  • Uzunova K, Zlatev Z. 2013. Drought-induced changes in photosyn- thesis of young cowpea plants. Agricultural Science and Technology 5: 32–34.
  • Vurayai R, Emongor V, Moseki B. 2011. Physiological responses of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.) to short periods of water stress during different developmental stages. Asian Journal of Agricultural Science 3: 37–43.
  • Wilson JB. 1988. A review of evidence on the control of shoot:root ratio, in relation to models. Annals of Botany 61: 433–449.
  • Zeven AC. 1998. Landraces: a review of definitions and classifica- tions. Euphytica 104: 127–139.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.