http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0593-2678
References
- Bänziger M, Setimela PS, Hodson D, Vivek B. 2006. Breeding for improved abiotic stress tolerance in maize adapted to southern Africa. Agricultural Water Management 80: 212–224. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.014
- Bond RS. 1982. Maturity differences between varieties in the selection programme. Proceedings of the South African Sugarcane Technologists’ Association 56: 136–139.
- Chapman S, Jackson PA, Rattey A. 2004. Genotype by environment interactions across the Australian sugarcane industry. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 26: 8 pages [n.p.].
- Cuenya MI, Mariotti JA. 1986. Selection of sugarcane for quality components and ripening ability. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists 19: 429–439.
- Dabholkar A. 1999. Elements of bio metrical genetics (rev edn). New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.
- Dudley JW. 1997. Quantitative genetics and plant breeding. Advances in Agronomy 59: 1–23. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60051-6
- Gravois KA, Milligan SB. 1992. Genetic relationships between fibre and sugarcane yield components. Crop Science 32: 62–67. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200010014x
- Kang M, Miller J, Tai P, Dean J, Glaz B. 1987. Implications of confounding of genotype year and genotype × crop effects in sugarcane. Field Crops Research 15: 349–355. doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(87)90022-0
- Kimbeng CA, Zhou M, da Silva JA. 2009. Genotype × environment interactions and resource allocation in sugarcane yield trials in the Rio Grande valley region of Texas. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 29: 11–24.
- Lingle SE, Johnson RM, Tew TL, Viator RP. 2010. Changes in juice quality and sugarcane yield with recurrent selection for sucrose. Field Crops Research 118: 152–157. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.05.002
- Nuss KJ. 1998. Aspect considered in a search for new farms for the experiment station. Proceedings of the South African Sugarcane Technologists’ Association 72: 42–45.
- Parfitt R, Thomas D. 2001. Final stage transfers in a regional breeding and selection programme for sugarcane. Proceedings of the South African Sugar Technologists’ Association 75: 151–153.
- Ramburan S. 2014. A multivariate illustration and interpretation of non-repeatable genotype × environment interactions in sugarcane. Field Crops Research 157: 57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.009
- Ramburan S, Wettergreen T, Berry S, Shongwe B. 2013. Genetic environmental and management contributions to ratoon decline in sugarcane. Field Crops Research 146: 105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.03.011
- Ramburan S, Zhou M, Labuschagne M. 2011. Interpretation of genotype × environment interactions of sugarcane: identifying significant environmental factors. Field Crops Research 124: 392–399. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.07.008
- Shoonees-Muir B, Ronaldson M, Naidoo G, Schorn P. 2009. SASTA laboratory manual including the official methods. Durban: South African Sugarcane Technologists’ Association.
- Tolessa TT, Keneni G, Sefera T, Jarso M, Bekele Y. 2013. Genotype × environment interaction and performance stability for grain yield in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes. International Journal of Plant Breeding 7: 116–123.
- Yan W, Kang MS. 2002. GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
- Zhou M. 2013. Conventional sugarcane breeding in South Africa: progress and future prospects. American Journal of Plant Science 4: 189–196. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2013.42025
- Zhou M. 2015. Minimum detectable differences for cane yield, sucrose content and sugar yield among the Midlands and Coastal short cycle sugarcane breeding programmes in South Africa. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 32: 175–182. doi: 10.1080/02571862.2015.1018353
- Zhou M, Joshi S, Maritz T. 2012. Trends and implications of genotype by environment interaction in South African sugarcane breeding. Journal of Crop Improvement 26: 163–176. doi: 10.1080/15427528.2011.622429
- Zhou M, Joshi S, Maritz T, Koberstein H. 2011. Components of genotype by environment interaction among SASRI regional breeding and selection programmes and their implications. Proceedings of South African Sugar Technologists’ Association 84: 363–374.