Tense marking in copulatives with particular reference to isiZulu

References

• Baker MC, Vinokurova N. 2010. On tense and copular verbs in nonverbal predications in Sakha. http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~mabaker/tense-and-copulas-Sakha.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Buell LC, de Dreu M. 2013. Subject raising in Zulu and the nature of PredP. The Linguistic Review 30(3): 423–466. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2013-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrie B. 1986. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cope AT. 1963. Nomino-verbal constructions in Zulu. African Language Studies 4: 69–97.
   Google Scholar
• Curnow TJ. 2000. Towards a cross-linguistic typology of copula constructions. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• De Clercq J. 1959. Die kopulatief of nie-verbale predikaat in Nguni en Sotho: met besondere verwysing na Zulu en Suid-Sotho. Unpublished dissertation. University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Dunham M. 2004. On the verbal system of Langi, a Bantu language of Tanzania. Studies in African Linguistics 33(2): 199–234.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune G. 1950. ‘To be’ and ‘to have’ in Shona. African Studies 9(2): 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00020185008706812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauton R. 2002. A critique of the Dokean approach towards the lexical classes ‘adjective’, ‘relative’ and ‘enumerative’ in Zulu. Journal for Language Teaching 36(3 & 4): 347–364.
   Google Scholar
• Jerro K. 2014. Copulas and the semantics of location. In: Brown C, Gu Q, Loos C, Mielens J, Nevau G (eds), TLS Proceedings of the 15th Texas Linguistic Society. pp. 91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Klein W. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lanham LW. 1971. The noun as the deep-structure source for Nguni adjectives and relatives. African Studies 30(3–4): 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00020187108707364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons J. 1968. Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165570
   Google Scholar
• McWhorter J. 1994. From focus marker to copula in Swahili. Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society: Special session on historical issues in African linguistics: 57–66. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v20i2.1485
   Google Scholar
• Meinhof C. 1948. Grundzüge einer vergleichenden Grammatik der Bantusprachen. (Zweite Auflage.) Hamburg: Eckardt & Messtorff.
   Google Scholar
• Nkabinde AC. n.d. An introduction to Zulu syntax. Pretoria: Acacia.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus LC. 1983. Werkwoordkategorieë in Zulu. Doctoral thesis. University of the Orange Free State, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus LC. 1988a. Basis for tense analysis in African languages. South African Journal of African Languages 8(4): 139–143.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus LC. 1988b. Identifying copulatives in Zulu and Southern Sotho. South African Journal of African Languages 8(2): 61–64.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus LC. 2006a. Identificative copulatives in Southern Ndebele: Evidence for diachronic postulations in Zulu. Literator 27(2): 109–134. https://doi.org/10.4102/lit.v27i2.195
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus LC. 2006b. The spectrum of the relative tenses of Zulu. South African Association for Language Teaching 40(1): 100–116.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus LC. 2008. Naming the so-called continuous past tenses of the south-eastern Bantu languages with particular reference to Zulu. South African Journal of African Languages 28(1): 69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus LC. 2016. A critique of ‘A re-evaluation of tense in isiZulu’. Literator 37(1): 1–12. http://www.literator.org.za/index.php/literator/article doi: 10.4102/lit.v37i1.1349
   Google Scholar
• Poulos G, Msimang CT. 1998. A linguistic analysis of Zulu. Cape Town: Via Afrika.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbach H. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze CT. 2004. When is a verb not a verb? In: Dahl A, Bentzen K, Svenonius P (eds), Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian conference of Linguistics 31(2): 400–415. https://doi.org/10.7557/12.11
   Google Scholar
• Stegen O. 2001. To be, or not to be: Functions of copula and auxiliaries in Rangi. Unpublished manuscript: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Taljaard PC, Bosch SE. 1988. Handbook of isiZulu. Pretoria: JL van Schaik.
   Google Scholar
• Taljard E. 2001. ‘n Diachroniese perspektief op die identifiserende kopulatief in Bantoe. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 19(1–2): 83–95. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610109486277
   Google Scholar
• Taljard E. 2003. ‘To be (with)’ or ‘to have’?’ A case for grammaticalisation in Northern Sotho. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 21(3): 169–181. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610309486339
   Google Scholar
• Tham SW. 2013. Possession as non-verbal predication. Berkley Linguistics Society 39: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eeden BIC. 1956. Zoeloe-grammatika. Stellenbosch and Grahamstown: Die Universiteitsuitgewers en –Boekhandelaars (Edms) Beperk.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wyk EB. 1953. Die kopulatiewe van Noord-Sotho. Masters dissertation. University of Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wyk EB. 1958. Woordverdeling in Noord-Sotho en Zoeloe – ‘n Bydrae tot die vraagstuk van woordidentifikasie in die Bantoetale. Doctoral thesis. University of Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Von Staden PMS. 1973. Adjektiewe en relatiefstamme in Zulu as soortlike naamwoorde. Limi 1(1): 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Welmers Wm.E. 1973. African language structures. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkes A. 1974. Oor die sogenaamde eksklusiewe kwantitatiewe van Zulu. Studies in Bantoetale (Taalseminaar 111): 76–86.
   Google Scholar