Exploring differential item functioning on reading achievement: A case for isiXhosa

References

• Andrich D, Hagquist C. 2012. Real and artificial differential item functioning. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 37(3): 387–416. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998611411913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekker I. 2003. Language attitudes and ethnolinguistic identity in South Africa: A critical review. Paper presented at the 4th Annual International Symposium on Bilingualism, 30 April–3 May, Tempe, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins J. 2001. Instructional conditions for trilingual development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 4(1): 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050108667719
   Google Scholar
• Ercikan K. 2002. Disentangling sources of differential item functioning in multi-language assessments. International Journal of Testing 2(3): 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT023&4_2
   Google Scholar
• Ercikan K, Gierl MJ, McCreith T, Puhan G, Koh K. 2004. Comparability of bilingual versions of assessments: Sources of incomparability of English and French versions of Canada’s national achievement tests. Applied Measurement in Education 17(3): 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1703_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierl MJ, Khaliq SN. 2001. Identifying sources of differential item and bundle functioning on translated achievement tests: A confirmatory analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement 38(2): 164–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gxilishe DS. 1996. The dilemma of dialect in the classroom: A case for Xhosa. Per Linguam Journals. www.perlinguam.journals.ac.za/pub/article/download/208/318
   Google Scholar
• Howie S, Venter E, van Staden S, Zimmerman L, du Toit C, Scherman V, Archer E. 2008. PIRLS 2006 Summary Report: South African Children’s Reading Literacy Achievement: Pretoria: Centre for Evaluation and Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Howie SJ, van Staden S, Tshele M, Dowse C, Zimmerman L. 2012. South African Children’s Reading Literacy Achievement Summary Report. Pretoria: Centre for Evaluation and Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Howie SJ, Combrinck C, Roux K, Tshele M, Mokoena G, McLeod Palane N. 2017. PIRLS Literacy 2016: South African highlights report. Pretoria: Centre for Evaluation and Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge RA. 1995. French: From dialect to standard. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maree K. 2015. First steps in research. Hatfield: Van Schaik Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer P. 1971. Townsmen and tribesmen: conservatism and the process of urbanization in a South African city. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mesthrie R (ed.). 2002. Language in South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486692
   Google Scholar
• Mtuze PT. 1992. A critical survey of Xhosa lexicography 1772–1989. Lexikos 2:165–177.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis IVS, Martin MO, Kennedy A, Foy P. 2007. PIRLS 2006 international report: IEA’s Progress in International Reading Literacy Study in 113 primary schools in 40 countries. Chestnut Hill: PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis IVS, Martin MO, Foy P, Drucker KT. 2012. PIRLS 2011 International Results in Reading. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Nkomo D, Wababa Z. 2013. IsiXhosa lexicography: Past, present and future. Paper presented at the Eighteenth International Association of African Lexicography (Afrilex), 2–5 July, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Nyamende A. 1994. Regional variation in Xhosa. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 26: 202–217.
   Google Scholar
• Peires JB. (ed.). 1981. Before and After Shaka: Papers in Nguni history. Grahamstown: Institute of Social and Economic Research, Rhodes University.
   Google Scholar
• Poulos G, Msimang CT. 1998. A linguistic study of Zulu. Pretoria: Via Afrika Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius EJ. 2014. Supporting transition or playing catch–up in Grade 4? Implications for standards in education and training. Perspectives in Education 32(10): 51–75.
   Google Scholar
• Shillington K. (ed.). 2005. Encyclopedia of African History. New York: Fitzroy Dearborn.
   Google Scholar
• Smith RM. 2004. Detecting item bias with Rasch model. In: Smith EV, Smith RM (eds), Introduction to Rasch Measurement. Maple Grove: JAM Press. pp. 391–418.
   Google Scholar
• Solano-Flores G, Backhoff E, Contreras-Nino LA. 2009. Theory of test translation error. International Journal of Testing 9(2): 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305050902880835
   Google Scholar
• StatisticsSA (STATSSA). 2011. Census 2011 Statistical release. www.statssa.gov.za/census2011/product/census2011inbrief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). 2007. Education for all Global Monitoring Report: Strong foundations. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar