References
- Abdelfatah H. 2016. Cyber learning from reality through virtuality to holoportation, status-quo and a proposed model for closing the gap in Africa. ASRO Journal of Education 1(2): 28–38.
- Al-Adwan A, Al-Adwan A, Smedley J. 2013. Exploring students acceptance of e-learning using technology acceptance model in Jordanian universities. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology 9(2): 4–18. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1071365.pdf
- Alqurashi E. 2019. Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education 40(1): 133–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
- Al-Rahmi WM, Yahaya N, Aldraiweesh AA, Alamri MM, Aljarboa NA., Alturki U, Aljeraiwi AA. 2019. Integrating technology acceptance model with innovation diffusion theory: An empirical investigation on students’ intention to use e-learning systems. IEEE Access 7: 26797–26809. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899368
- Banditvilai C. 2016. Enhancing students’ language skills through blended learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 14(3): 220–229.
- Binyamin SS, Rutter M, Smith S. 2019. Extending the technology acceptance model to understand students’ use of learning management systems in Saudi higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning 14(3): 4–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9732
- Cheung R, Vogel D. 2013. Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education 63: 160–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003
- Davis FD. 1985. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15192
- Eom S. 2019. The effects of student motivation and self-regulated learning strategies on students’ perceived e-learning outcomes and satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice 19(7): 29–42.
- Huang Q. 2016. Learners’ perceptions of blended learning and the roles and interaction of f2f and online learning. ORTESOL Journal 33: 14–33.
- Johnson RD, Hornik S, Salas E. 2008. An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66(5): 356–369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.11.003
- Kim M, Choi D. 2018. Effects of self-directed learning readiness on academic performance and perceived usefulness for each element of flipped learning. Educational Technology International 19(1): 123–151.
- Lee BC, Yoon JO, Lee I. 2009. Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education 53(4): 1320–1329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014
- Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KR. 2003. The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12(1): 50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01250
- Liaw SS. 2008. Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education 51(2): 864–873. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005
- Liaw SS, Huang HM. 2013. Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education 60(1): 14–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015
- Masrom M. 2007. Technology acceptance model and e-learning. 12th International Conference on Education, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah Institute of Education, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, 21–24 May 2007. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8f8c/cf5dcfb60df66dbf2c18fc9b130c63ddce4a.pdf
- Merandu EE, Makudza F, Ngwenya SN. 2019. Predicting students’ intention and actual use of e-learning using the technology acceptance model: A case from Zimbabwe. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 18(6): 110–127.
- Njenga JK. 2011. eLearning adoption in Eastern and Southern African higher education institutions. PhD thesis, University of the Western Cape, South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/2018
- Njenga JK. 2018. Sociocultural paradoxes and issues in e-learning use in higher education Africa. Globalisation, Societies and Education 16(1): 120–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2017.1390664
- Paechter M, Maier B, Macher D. 2010. Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education 54(1): 222–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005
- Park SY. 2009. An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 12(3): 150–162.
- Persico D, Manca S, Pozzi F. 2014. Adapting the technology acceptance model to evaluate the innovative potential of e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior 30: 614–622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.045
- Rafiee M, Abbasian-Naghneh S. 2019. E-learning: development of a model to assess the acceptance and readiness of technology among language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning 34(5-6): 730–750. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1640255
- Richards JC, Rodgers TS. 2014. Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Roca JC, Chiu CM, Martínez FJ. 2006. Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(8): 683–696. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
- Salloum SA, Alhamad AQM, Al-Emran M, Monem AA, Shaalan K. 2019. Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model. IEEE Access 7: 128445–128462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467
- Scherer R, Siddiq F, Tondeur J. 2019. The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education 128: 13–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
- Singh UG, Gokool R. 2018. Students’ perceptions of the Moodle Quiz E-assessment tool in an isiZulu language course. Journal for Language Teaching 52(1): 128–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v52i1.7
- Timothy M, Oladunjoye JA, Agu EO. 2016. Comparative study of e-learning experiences: A case study of Nigeria, South Africa and United States. International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing 9(10): 161–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14257/ijgdc.2016.9.10.15
- Venkatesh V, Bala H. 2008. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences 39(2): 273–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
- Venkatesh V, Davis FD. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46(2): 186–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
- Wingo NP, Ivankova NV, Moss JA. 2017. Faculty perceptions about teaching online: Exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organising framework. Online Learning 21(1): 15–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.761
- Zhao H. 2016. Factors influencing self-regulation in e-learning 2.0: Confirmatory factor model. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 42(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21432/T2C33K
- Zimmerman BJ. 2000. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In: Boekaerts M, Pintrich PR, Zeidner M (eds), Handbook of Self-Regulation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press. pp. 13–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7