A historical analysis of tense-aspect variations in Malawian CiTonga (N15)

References

• Bentley M, Kulemeka A. 2001. Chichewa. Munich: Lin com Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Bernander R. 2017. Grammar and grammaticalization in Manda: An analysis of the wider TAM domain in a Tanzanian Bantu language. Doctoral dissertation, University of Gothenburg, SWeden.
   Google Scholar
• Bickmore L, Mkochi W. 2018. OCP effects in Malawian CiTonga tone patterns. Nordic Journal of African Studies 27(4): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Booij G, Lieber R. 1993. On the simultaneity of morphological and prosodic structure. In: Hargus S, Kaisse EM (eds), Phonetics and phonology volume 4: studies in lexical phonology. San Diego: Academic Press. pp 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/8978-0-12-325071-1.50007-8
   Google Scholar
• Botne R. 1998. The evolution of future tenses from serial 'say" constructions in central eastern Bantu. Diachronica 15(2): 207-230. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.15.2.02bot
   Google Scholar
• Bybee J, Peterkins R, Pagliuca W. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspecand modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Croft WA. 2006. The relevance of an evolutionary model to historical linguistics. In: Thomsen ON (ed.). Competing models of linguistic change: Evolution and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp 91-132. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.279.08cro
   Google Scholar
• Downing LJ. 2003. Compounding and tonal non-transfer in Bantu languages. Phonology 20(1): 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/80952675703004457
   Google Scholar
• Elmslie WA. 1923. Introductory grammar of the Tumbuka language. Rumphi: Livingstonia Mission Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie M. 1948. The classification of the Bantu languages. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heine B. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticaiization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195083873.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Heine B. 1994. Grammaticalization as an explanatory parameter. In: Pagliuca W (ed.), Perspectives on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp 255-287. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.109.08hei
   Google Scholar
• Heine B, Kuteva T. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511613463
   Google Scholar
• Heine B. Kuteva T. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511614132
   Google Scholar
• Heine B, Kuteva T. 2007. The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199227761.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Heine B, Reh M. 1982. Patterns of grammaticalization in African languages. Cologne: AKUP.
   Google Scholar
• Heine B. Reh M. 1984. Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Buske.
   Google Scholar
• Heine B, Claudi U, Hunnemeyer F. 1991. Grammaticaiization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry G. 1891. A grammar of Chinyanja, a language spoken in British Central Africa, on and near the shores of Lake Nyasa. Aberdeen: G. and W. Fraser.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper P, Traugott EC. 2003. Grammaticalization (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525
   Google Scholar
• Hyman LM. 2008. Directional asymmetries in the morphology and phonology of words, with special reference to Bantu. Linguistics 46(2): 309–350. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman LM. 2009. The natural history of verb-stem reduplication in Bantu. Morphology 19(2): 177–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-009-9140-y
   Google Scholar
• Hyman LM, lnkelas S, Sibanda G. 2008. Morphosyntactic correspondence in Bantu reduplication. In: Hanson K, lnkelas S (eds), The nature of the word: Essays in honour of Paul Kiparsky. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. pp 273-310. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7894.003.0017
   Google Scholar
• Kishindo PJ, Lipenga AA. 2006. Parlons Citumbuka: langue et culture du Malawi et de Zambie [Let's speak Citumbuka: Language and Culture of Malawi and Zambia]. Paris: L'Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Kiso A. 2012. Tense and aspect in Chichewa, Chitumbuka and Chisena. PhD thesis, Stockholm University, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann C. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Linguae Stile 20:303-318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann C. 2015. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.26530/0APEN_603353
   Google Scholar
• Maho JF. 2009. The online version of the 2nd new updated Guthrie list, a referential classification of the Bantu languages. Retrieved from brill.com/fileasset/downloads_products/35125_Bantu-New-updated-Guthrie-List.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mkochi W. 2008. Liquid/glide/zero alternation in CiTonga: an optimality analysis. Journal of Humanities 21(1): 72–86.
   Google Scholar
• Mkochi W. 2017a. Minimal prosodic stems in Malawian Tonga. Journal of Humanities 25(1): 128–150.
   Google Scholar
• Mkochi W. 2017b. Phonological variation of the present progressive aspect marker -tu- in Malawian Tonga: A prosodic analysis. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 35(1): 365–383. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2017.1406312
   Google Scholar
• Mkochi W. 2018. Morphosyntactic status of zamu- and ku- in Malawian Tonga. South African Journal of African Languages 38(3): 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2018.1518046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkochi W. 2019a. Glide formation is not motivated by onset requirement in CiTonga, glide epenthesis is. South African Journal of African Languages 39(3): 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2019.1672326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkochi W. 2019b. Encoding the plural-honorific suffix -ani and the imperfective -anga in Malawian CiTonga (N.15). Studies in African Linguistics 48(2): 356–369. https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v48i2.118043
   Google Scholar
• Mkochi W. 2021. V2 elision in root-suffix hiatus contexts in Malawian CiTonga. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39(3): 259–268. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2021.1939077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mtenje AD. 2006. Alignment theory and prosody in Malawian CiTonga. Linguistic Analysis 32(3-4): 327–365.
   Google Scholar
• National Statistical Office. 2018. Malawi population and housing census: preliminary report. Zomba, Malawi.
   Google Scholar
• Ngonyani D. 2003. A grammar of Chingoni. Munich: Lincom Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Nurse D. 2008. Tense and aspect in Bantu. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199239290.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Nurse D, Muzale H. 1999. Tense and aspect in Great Lakes Bantu languages. In: Hombert J-M, Hyman LM (eds), Bantu historical linguistics: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Standford: Centre for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI). Pp 517-544.
   Google Scholar
• Nurse D, Hinnebusch TJ. 1993. Swahili and Sabaki: A linguistic history. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nurse D, Philippson G. 2006. Common tense-aspect markers in Bantu. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 27: 155–196. doi: 10.1515/JALL.2006.009
   Google Scholar
• Persohn B. 2020. The verb in Nyakyusa: A focus on tense, aspect, and modality (2nd revised edn). Berlin: Language Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riddel A. 1880. A grammar of the Chinyanja language as spoken at Lake Nyassa. Edinburgh: J. Maclaren & Son.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott EC. 2010. Grammaticalization. In: Luraghi S, Bubenik V (eds), Continuum companion to historical linguistics London: Continuum Press. pp 269-283.
   Google Scholar
• Vail HL. 1973. Aspects of the Tumbuka verb. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin. Madison, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins MH. 1937. A grammar of Chichewa. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar