81
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The original analytic/synthetic distinction: Still no cause for concernFootnote

Pages 271-278 | Received 15 Feb 2015, Accepted 29 Apr 2015, Published online: 15 Sep 2015

References

  • Allais, L. 2015. Manifest Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Anderson, R.L. 2004. ‘It Adds Up After All: Kant's Philosophy of Arithmetic in Light of the Traditional Logic’, Philosophy and Phenomological Research 69, pp. 501–540.
  • Anderson, R.L. 2010. ‘The Introduction to the Critique: Framing the Question’. In: Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 75–92.
  • Kant, I. 1781, 1787. Critique of Pure Reason, Guyer, P., Wood, A. (eds; trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Russell, G. 2007. ‘The Analytic/Synthetic Distinction’, Philosophy Compass 2, pp. 712–729.
  • Quine, W.V. 1951. ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, The Philosophical Review 60(1), pp. 20–43.
  • Quine, W.V. 1960. ‘Carnap and Logical Truth’, Synthese 12(4), pp. 350–375.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.