Notes and references
- K. Waltz (1979), Theory of International Politics (Boston: Addison-Wesley).
- For an excellent discussion of constructivism see Adler, E. (2000), ‘Constructivism and International Relations’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. A. Simmons (eds). Handbook of International Relations (London, Sage).
- Although professing to be a constructivist, Wendt has developed his own unique brand of constructivist theorising, which he calls ‘structural idealism’.
- H. R. Alker (2000), ‘On Learning from Wendt’, Review of International Studies, 26(1), pp. 141–50.
- S. Smith (2000), ‘Wendt's World’, Review of International Studies, 26(1), pp. 151–63.
- R. O. Keohane (2000), ‘Ideas Part-Down’, Review of International Studies, 26(1), pp. 125–30.
- H. Suganami (2002), ‘On Wendt's Philosophy: A Critique’, Review of International Studies, 28(1), pp. 23–37.
- Smith (2000), op. cit., pp. 152–3.
- Smith, ibid., p. 157.
- Smith, ibid., p. 157.
- ‘Epistemologically I have sided with positivists…on ontology…I will side in subsequent chapters with post-positivists’ (p. 90).
- Smith (2000), op. cit.
- Smith, ibid.
- Smith, ibid.
- Smith, ibid.
- Keohane (2000), op. cit., p. 125.
- F. Kratochwil (2000), ‘Constructing the New Orthodoxy? Wendt's “Social Theory of International Politics” and the Constructivist Challenge’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29 (1), pp. 73–101.
- D. C. Copeland (2000), ‘The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism—A Review Essay’, International Security, 25 (2), pp. 187–212.
- M. Shaw (2000), ‘Waltzing Alexander: Constructing the New American Ideology’, (http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/hafa3/wendt.htm).
- M. Mann (1993), Sources of Social Power. Volume II. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
- R. L. Doty (2000), ‘Desire All the Way Down’, Review of International Studies, 26(1), pp. 137–9.
- Copeland (2000), op. cit.
- This follows on from the argument developed in A. Wendt (1987), ‘Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power polities’. International Organization, 46(2). pp. 391–425.
- Wendt notes that these three terms are adapted from language used by Martin Wright and the English school. He emphasises that he does not, however, ‘claim adherence to their views; the labels are intended merely as metaphors or stylized representations’ (p. 247).
- Finnemore and Sikkink have produced some interesting work exploring these questions. See M. Finnemore and K. Sikkink (1998), ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization, 52(4), pp. 887–917.
- R. H. Jackson (1990), Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
- S. D. Krasner (2000), ‘Wars, Hotel Fires, and Plane Crashes’, Review of International Studies, 26, p. 132.
- Krasner, ibid., p. 132.
- Krasner, ibid., p. 132.
- A. Wendt (2000), ‘On the Via Media: a response to the critics’. Review of International Studies, 26(1), p. 177.
- Krasner, ibid., p. 135.
- Copeland (2000), op. cit., p. 207.
- Copeland, ibid., p. 200.
- Copeland, ibid., p. 282.
- Alker (2000), op. cit., p. 141.
- Kratochwil (2000), op. cit., p. 89.
- Keohane (2000), op. cit., p. 130.