Towards a Framework of Alignment in International Relations

References

• Ayoob, M. 1997. “Defining Security: A Subaltern Realist Perspective.” In Critical Security Studies, edited by K. Krause and M. C. Williams. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. N., and J. S. Levy. 1991. “The Domestic Sources of Alliances and Alignment: The Case of Egypt 1962–1973.” International Organization 45 (3): 369–395. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300033142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, K., 1991. “Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice.” International Affairs 67 (3): 527–545.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. 1991. People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Cerny, P. C. 1990. The Changing Architecture of Politics: Structure, Agency and the Future of the State. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. 1998. “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory.” World Politics 50 (2): 324–348. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100008133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, S. R. 1991. “Explaining Third World Alignment.” World Politics 43 (2): 233–236. doi: 10.2307/2010472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopf, T. 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23 (1): 171–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopf, T. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 & 1999. Ithaca. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kajsa Ji Noe Oest. 2007. ‘The end of alliance theory’, Department of Political Studies, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. http://polsci.ku.dk/arbejdspapirer/2007/ap_2007_03.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, P. 2008. The Second World: Empires and Influence in the New Global Order. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Klare, M. T., and D. C. Thomas, eds. 1994. World Security: Challenges for a New Century. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, K., and M. C. Williams, 1996. “Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods.” Mershon International Studies Review 40 (2): 229–254.
   Google Scholar
• Liska, G. 1962. Nations in Alliance: The Limits of Interdependence. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, H. 1948. Politics Among Nations. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Onuf, N. G. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Qobo, M. 2010. “Refocusing South Africa's Economic Diplomacy: The ‘African Agenda’ and Emerging Powers.” South African Journal of International Affairs 17 (1): 13–28. doi: 10.1080/10220461003763833
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 1998. “NATO Enlargement: A Constructivist Explanation.” Security Studies 8 (2–3): 198–234. doi: 10.1080/09636419808429378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweller, R. 1994. “Bandwagoning for Profit.” International Security 19 (1): 72–107. doi: 10.2307/2539149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. 2000. “The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science?” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2 (3): 372–402.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, G. H. 1991. “Alliances, Balance and Stability: A Review of Stephen Walt's ‘Origin of Alliances’ and ‘The Balance of Power: Stability in International Systems’ by Emerson, M.S.N, Ordeshook, P.C. & Rose, G.F.” International Organization 45 (1): 121–142. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, G. H. 1997. Alliance Politics. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walt, S. M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walt, S. M. 1991. “The Renaissance of Security Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 35 (2): 211–239.
   Google Scholar
• Walt, S. M. 2009. “Alliances in a Unipolar World.” World Politics 61 (3): 86–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, M. D. 1982. Research Gaps in Alliance Dynamics. Denver: University of Denver.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. 1997. “Hierarchy Amidst Anarchy: A Transaction Costs Approach to International Security Co-Operation.” International Studies quarterly 41 (2): 321–340. doi: 10.1111/1468-2478.00044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46 (2): 391–425. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, T. S. 2012. “‘Alignment’ Not ‘Alliance’—The Shifting Paradigm of International Security Co-Operation: Towards a Conceptual Taxonomy of Alignment.” Review of International Studies 38 (1): 53–76. doi: 10.1017/S0260210511000209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuma, J. G. 2012. State of the Nation Address, 9 February 2012. http://www.info.gov.za/speech/DynamicAction?pageid=461&tid=55960
   Google Scholar