Reassessing the Institutional Legitimacy of the South African Constitutional Court: New Evidence, Revised Theory

References

• Baird, Vanessa A. 2001. “Building Institutional Legitimacy: The Role of Procedural Justice.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (#2): 333–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, Brandon L., and Christopher D. Johnston. 2013. “On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (#1): 184–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldeira, Gregory A. 1986. “Neither the Purse Nor the Sword: Dynamics of Confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 80 (#4): 1209–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldeira, Gregory A., and James L. Gibson. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (#3): 635–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Constitutional Transitions at NYU Law, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. 2014. Constitutional Courts After the Arab Spring: Appointment Mechanisms and Relative Judicial Independence. New York: NYU Law School.
   Google Scholar
• Christenson, Dino P., and David M. Glick. 2015. “Chief Justice Roberts's Health Care Decision Disrobed: the Microfoundations of the Supreme Court's Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (#2): 403–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6 ($1): 279–295.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, Reynaud N., and Jason Brickhill. 2006. “The Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty and the South African Constitutional Court.” Pennsylvania State International Law Review 25 (#2): 371–404.
   Google Scholar
• Du Plessis, Max. 2002. “Between Apology and Utopia—The Constitutional Court and Public Opinion.” South African Journal on Human Rights 18: 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley & Son, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, David. 1975. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science 5: 435–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellmann, Stephen. 1995. “Law and Legitimacy in South Africa.” Law & Social Inquiry 20 (#2): 407–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon, Richard H., Jr. 2005. “Legitimacy and the Constitution.” Harvard Law Review 118 (#6): 1789–1853.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Charles, and Liane C. Kosaki. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review 83: 751–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Lawrence M. 1977. Law and Society: An Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L. 1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law & Society Review 23: 469–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L. 1991. “Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Compliance With Supreme Court Decisions: A Question of Causality.” Law and Society Review 25 (1991): 631–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L. 2003. “The Legacy of Apartheid: Racial Differences in the Legitimacy of Democratic Institutions and Processes in the New South Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 36 (#7): 772–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L. 2004. Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L. 2008. “The Evolving Legitimacy of the South African Constitutional Court.” In Justice and Reconciliation in Post-Apartheid South Africa, edited by François du Bois and Antje du Bois-Pedain, 229–266. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L. 2011. “A Note of Caution about the Meaning of ‘The Supreme Court can usually be trusted … ’.” Law & Courts: Newsletter of the Law & Courts Section of the American Political Science Association 21 (#3): 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L. 2015a. “Legitimacy Is for Losers: The Interconnections of Institutional Legitimacy, Performance Evaluations, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority.” In Motivating Cooperation and Compliance with Authority: The Role of Institutional Trust. [Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Volume 62.] edited by Brian H. Bornstein and Alan J. Tomkins, 81–116. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L. 2015b. “Apartheid's Long Shadow: How Racial Divides Distort South Africa's Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 94 (#2): 41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 1992. “Blacks and the United States Supreme Court: Models of Diffuse Support.” Journal of Politics 54 (#4): 1120–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 2003. “Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court.” The Journal of Politics 65 (#1):1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 2009. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations: Positivity Theory and the Judgments of the American People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Vanessa Baird. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of Na­tional High Courts.” American Political Science Review 92 (#2): 343–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Lester Kenyatta Spence. 2003a. “Measuring Attitudes Toward the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (#2): 354–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Lester Kenyatta Spence. 2003b. “The Supreme Court and the U.S. Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?” British Journal of Political Science 33: (#4): 535–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Amanda Gouws. 2003. Overcoming Intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in Democratic Persuasion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., Milton Lodge, and Benjamin Woodson. 2014. “Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority.” Law and Society Review 48 (#4): 837–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Michael J. Nelson. 2014a. “Can the U.S. Supreme Court Have Too Much Legitimacy?” In Making Law and Courts Research Relevant: Normative Implications of Empirical Research in Law and Courts, edited by Brandon L. Bartels and Chris W. Bonneau, 169–179. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Michael J. Nelson. 2014b. “The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10: 201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Michael J. Nelson. 2015a. “Is the U.S. Supreme Court's Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology?” American Journal of Political Science 59 (#1): 162–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Michael J. Nelson. 2015b. “Too Liberal, Too Conservative, or About Right? The Implications of Ideological Dissatisfaction for Supreme Court Legitimacy.” Paper delivered at the 2015 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA, September 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Michael J. Nelson. 2016. “Change in Institutional Support for the U.S. Supreme Court: Is the Court's Legitimacy Imperiled by the Decisions It Makes?” Public Opinion Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Giliomee, Hermann, and Lawrence Schlemmer (with Sarita Hauptfleisch), eds. 1994. The Bold Experiment: South Africa's New Democracy. Johannesburg: Southern.
   Google Scholar
• Giliomee, Hermann, and Charles Simkins, eds. 1999. The Awkward Embrace: One-Party Domination and Democracy. Cape Town: Tafelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Graubard, Stephen R. 2001. “Preface to the Issue ‘Why South Africa Matters’.” Daedalus 130 (#1): v–viii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, Valerie J. 1995. “The Supreme Court and Opinion Change: An Experimental Study of the Court's Ability to Change Opinion.” American Politics Research 23 (#1): 109–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2000. “The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review 94 (#1): 89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2003. Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Donald L. 1991. A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilmot, James, and Lever Jeffrey. 2000. “South Africa–The Second Republic: Race, Inequality and Democracy in South Africa.” Three Nations at the Crossroad: 42–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kritzer, Herbert M. 2001. “The Impact of Bush v. Gore on Public Perceptions and Knowledge of the Supreme Court.” Judicature 85 (#1): 32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, E. Allan, and Tom R. Tyler. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Thomas R. 1989. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, Robert, Helen Taylor, and Cherrel Africa. 1999. “Judgement and Choice in the 1999 South African Election.” Politikon: South African Journal of Political Science 26 (#2): 235–247.
   Google Scholar
• Mondak, Jeffrey J. 1992. “Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court.” American Politics Quarterly 20 (October): 457–477.
   Google Scholar
• Mondak, Jeffrey J. 1993. “Institutional Legitimacy and Procedural Justice: Reexamining the Question of Causality.” Law and Society Review 27 (#3): 599–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondak, Jeffery J., and Shannon Ishiyama Smithey. 1997. “The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” The Journal of Politics 59 (November): 1114–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posel, Deborah. 2001. “What's in a Name? Racial Categorisations [sic] Under Apartheid and Their Afterlife.” Transformation 47 (2001): 50–74. Accessed June 3, 2003. http://www.transformation.und.ac.za/issue2047/4720posel1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Roux, Theunis. 2013. The Politics of Principle: The First South African Constitutional Court, 1995–2005. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shugerman, Jed Handelsman. 2012. The People's Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, James. 2012. FDR and Chief Justice Hughes: The President, the Supreme Court, and the Epic Battle over the New Deal. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Dan, and Nicholas Scurich. 2011. “Lay Judgments of Judicial Decision Making.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8 (#4): 709–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, Joseph, and Walter F. Murphy. 1981. “Patterns of Public Support for the Supreme Court: A Panel Study.” The Journal of Politics 43: 24–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, Leonard, and Andrew Prior.1982. South African Politics. Cape Town: David Philip.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, Tom R. 2006. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.” Annual Review of Psychology 57 (January): 375–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, Tom R., and Kenneth Rasinski. 1991. “Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson.” Law and Society Review 25 (#3): 621–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wale, Kim. 2013. Confronting Exclusion: Time for Radical Reconciliation. SA Reconciliation Barometer Survey: 2013 Report. Cape Town: Institute for Justice and Reconciliation.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, Michael L. 2007. “Sociological Legitimacy in Supreme Court Opinions.” Washington & Lee Law Review 64: 1011–1070.
   Google Scholar
• Woodson, Benjamin, James L. Gibson, and Milton Lodge. 2011. “Judicial Symbols and the Link Between Institutional Legitimacy and Acquiescence.” Paper delivered at the 2011 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, March 31–April 3.
   Google Scholar