Decolonising Clientelism: ‘Re-centring’ Analyses of Local State–Society Relations in South Africa

References

• Ackerman, J. 2004. “Co-governance for Accountability: Beyond ‘Exit’ and ‘Voice’.” World Development 32 (3): 447–463. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anciano, F. 2017. “Clientelism as Civil Society? Unpacking the Relationship Between Clientelism and Democracy at the Local Level in South Africa.” Journal of Asian and African Studies. doi:10.1177/0021909617709487.
   Google Scholar
• Arblaster, A. 1987. Democracy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auyero, J. 1999. “‘From the Client’s Point(s) of View’: How Poor People Perceive and Evaluate Political Clientelism.” Theory and Society 28: 297–334. doi: 10.1023/A:1006905214896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. 2004. “Towards a Universal Framework for Democracy Assessment.” Democratization 11 (2): 1–17. doi: 10.1080/13510340412331294182
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, A. 2015. “Power, Patronage, and Gatekeeper Politics in South Africa.” African Affairs 114 (455): 226–248. doi: 10.1093/afraf/adu083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bénit-Gbaffou, C. 2011. “‘Up Close and Personal’ – How Does Local Democracy Help the Poor Access the State? Stories of Accountability and Clientelism in Johannesburg.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 46: 453–464. doi: 10.1177/0021909611415998
   Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, D., and A. Goldsmith. 2002. Clientelism, Patrimonialism and Democratic Governance: An Overview and Framework for Assessment and Programming. Washington, DC: U.S. Agency for International Development.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 2006. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology, edited by R. Goodin, and P. Pettit, 159–169. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., and U. Kothari. 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny? New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. 1991. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. 2000. On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, H. 2014. “Patronage from Below: Political Unrest in an Informal Settlement in South Africa.” African Affairs 113 (453): 518–539. doi: 10.1093/afraf/adu056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sousa, L. 2008. Clientelism and the Quality(ies) of Democracy: Public and Policy Aspects. DISC Working Paper Series. Hungary: Centre for the Study of Imperfections in Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. 1999. Developing Democracy: Towards Consolidation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L., and L. Morlino. 2005. “Introduction.” In Assessing the Quality of Democracy, edited by L. Diamond and L. Morlino, ix–xiii. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Focus group with PMF women leaders. 2017. “ Focus Group Conducted by Fiona Anciano and Laurence Piper.” September.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. 2012. “State Power and Clientelism: Eight Propositions for Discussion.” In Clientelism in Everyday Latin America Politics, edited by T. Hilgers, 187–212. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. 1983. The Anatomy of Power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. 2007. “Forward.” In Spaces for Change? The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas, edited by A. Cornwall and V. Coelho. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, R. 1998. “Rethinking Clientelism: Demands, Discourses and Practices in Contemporary Brazil.” European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 65: 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. 1996. Models of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hicken, A. 2011. “Clientelism.” Annual Review of Political Science 14: 289–310. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgers, T. 2012. “Clientelistic Democracy or Democratic Clientelism: A Matter of Context.” In Clientelism in Everyday Latin America Politics, edited by T. Hilgers, 3–22. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkin, J., and A. Mastropaolo. 2001. “From Patronage to Clientelism: Comparing the Italian and Spanish Experiences.” In Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation: The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective, edited by S. Piattoni, 152–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Independent Electoral Commission. n.d. “Election Reports.” Accessed May 20, 2017. http://www.elections.org.za/content/Elections/Election-reports/.
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, Philip. 2005. Democratization and Clientelism: Why Are Young Democracies Badly Governed? Policy Research Working Paper Series; No. WPS 3594. Washington, DC: World Bank Working Paper; No. 3472. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, P., and R. Vlaicu. 2005. Democracy, Credibility and Clientelism. Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kelsall, T., D. Booth, D. Cammack, and F. Golooba-Mutebi. 2010. Developmental Patrimonialism? Questioning the Orthodoxy on Political Governance and Economic Progress in Africa. Africa Power and Politics Working Paper, 9. London: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. 1996. “A Typology of Corrupt Transactions in Developing Countries.” IDS Bulletin 27 (2): 12–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.1996.mp27002003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., and S. Wilkinson, eds. 2007. Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koelble, T. A., and E. Lipuma. 2008. “Democratizing Democracy: A Postcolonial Critique of Conventional Approaches to the ‘Measurement of Democracy’.” Democratization 15 (1): 1–28. doi: 10.1080/13510340701768075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemanski, C. 2017. “Unequal Citizenship in Unequal Cities: Participatory Urban Governance in Post-apartheid South Africa.” International Development Planning Review 39 (1): 15–35. doi: 10.3828/idpr.2017.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodge, T. 2014. “Neo-patrimonial Politics in the ANC.” African Affairs 113 (450): 1–23. doi: 10.1093/afraf/adt069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A. 2015. “Decolonizing Knowledge and the Question of the Archive.” Accessed May 22, 2016. http://wiser.wits.ac.za/system/files/Achille%20Mbembe%20-%20Decolonizing%20Knowledge%20and%20the%20Question%20of%20the%20Archive.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Medard, J. F. 1982. “The Underdeveloped State in Tropical Africa: Political Clientelism and Neopatrimonialism.” In Private Patronage and Public Power, edited by C. Clapham. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Meth, P. 2013. “Committees, Witchdoctors and the ‘Mother-Body’: Everyday Politics in the Township of Cato Manor, South Africa.” Habitat International 39: 269–277. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndletyana, M., P. Makhalemele, and R. Mathekga. 2013. Patronage Politics Divides Us: A Study of Poverty, Patronage and Inequality in South Africa. Gauteng: MISTRA.
   Google Scholar
• Nyaluke, D. 2014. “The African Basis of Democracy and Politics for the Common Good: A Critique of the Neopatrimonial Perspective.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 10 (2): 141–164.
   Google Scholar
• Parnell, S., and J. Robinson. 2012. “(Re)theorizing Cities from the Global South: Looking Beyond Neoliberalism.” Urban Geography 33 (4): 593–617. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.33.4.593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. 1985. The Problem of Political Obligation: A Critique of Liberal Theory. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S., ed. 2001. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation: The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piliavsky, A., ed. 2014. Patronage as Politics in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piper, L., and R. Deacon. 2009. “Too Dependent to Participate: Ward Committees and Local Democratisation in South Africa.” Local Government Studies 35 (4): 415–433. doi: 10.1080/03003930902992683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piper, L., and B. von Lieres. 2014. “Introduction: The Crucial Role of Mediators in Relations Between States and Citizens.” In Mediated Citizenship: The Informal Politics of Speaking for Citizens in the Global South, edited by B. Von Lieres, and L. Piper, 1–24. Oxford: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pitcher, A., M. H. Moran, and M. Johnston. 2009. “Rethinking Patrimonialism and Neopatrimonialism in Africa.” African Studies Review 52 (1): 125–156. doi: 10.1353/arw.0.0163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roniger, L. 2004. “Political Clientelism, Democracy, and Market Economy.” Comparative Politics 36 (3): 353–375. doi: 10.2307/4150135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. London: Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Sklar, R. 1999. “Democracy and Constitutionalism.” In The Self-restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, edited by A. Schedler, L. Diamond, and M. Plattner, 53–58. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, G. 1993. Democracy and Democratization. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terchek, R., and T. Conte. 2001. Theories of Democracy: A Reader. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Thiong’o, Ngũgĩ wa. 1986. Decolonizing the Mind. The Politics of Language in African Literature. Nairobi: East African Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, N. 2007. The Path from Neopatrimonialism: Democracy and Clientelism in Africa Today. Working Paper Series. No3-07. New York: Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• White, F. 2008. “Strengthening Democracy? The Role of Social Movements as Agents of Civil Society in Post-apartheid South Africa.” PhD thesis, University of London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, L. 2002. Democratization: Theory and Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2000. Anticorruption in Transition: A Contribution to the Policy Debate. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 2001. “Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 29 (5): 670–690. doi: 10.1177/0090591701029005004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar