Go Global or Go Home: Comparing the Regional vs. Global Engagement of Brazil and South Africa at the UN General Assembly

References

• Abdenur, Adriana Erthal, Frank Mattheis, and Pedro Seabra. 2016. “An Ocean for the Global South: Brazil and the Zone of Peace and Cooperation in the South Atlantic.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (3): 1112–1131. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2016.1230592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adebajo, Adekeye. 2018. “Introduction: The Concentric Circles of South Africa’s Foreign Policy.” In Foreign Policy in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Security Diplomacy and Trade, edited by Adekeye Adebajo and Kudrat Virk, 1–50. London: I.B.Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Aeschlimann, Johann, and Mary Regan. 2017. The GA Handbook: A Practical Guide to the United Nations General Assembly. New York: Permanent Mission of Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Alden, Chris, and Maxi Schoeman. 2013. “South Africa in the Company of Giants: The Search for Leadership in a Transforming Global Order.” International Affairs 89 (1): 111–129. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alden, Chris, and Maxi Schoeman. 2015. “South Africa’s Symbolic Hegemony in Africa.” International Politics 52 (2): 239–254. doi: 10.1057/ip.2014.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2012. De Dutra a Lula: a Condução e os Determinantes da Política Externa Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campos.
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff, Paul-Henri. 2003. “External and Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy Ambiguity: South African Foreign Policy and the Projection of Pluralist Middle Power.” Politikon 30 (1): 183–201. doi: 10.1080/0258934032000147291
   Google Scholar
• Burges, Sean W. 2015. “Revisiting Consensual Hegemony: Brazilian Regional Leadership in Question.” International Politics 52 (2): 193–207. doi: 10.1057/ip.2014.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cline, Kirssa, Patrick Rhamey, Alexis Henshaw, Alesia Sedziaka, Aakriti Tandon, and Thomas J. Volgy. 2011. “Identifying Regional Powers and Their Status.” In Major Powers and the Quest for Status in International Politics: Global and Regional Perspectives, edited by Thomas J. Volgy, Renato Corbetta, Keith A. Grant, and Ryan G. Baird, 133–157. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, Scarlett. 2006. “Displaced Multilateralism? South Africa’s Participation at the United Nations: Disjunctures, Continuities and Contrasts.” In The New Multilateralism in South African Diplomacy, edited by Donna Lee, Ian Taylor, and Paul Williams, 25–50. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Corrêa, Luis Felipe de Seixas. 2013. Brazil in the United Nations 1946-2011. Brasília: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão.
   Google Scholar
• Dabène, Olivier. 2009. The Politics of Regional Integration in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Destradi, Sandra. 2010. “Regional Powers and Their Strategies: Empire, Hegemony, and Leadership.” Review of International Studies 36 (4): 903–930. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510001361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemes, Daniel. 2009. “Regional Power South Africa: Co-Operative Hegemony Constrained by Historical Legacy.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 27 (2): 135–157. doi: 10.1080/02589000902867238
   Google Scholar
• Flemes, Daniel, and Douglas Lemke. 2010. “Findings and Perspectives of Regional Power Research.” In Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, edited by Daniel Flemes, 313–333. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gardini, Gian Luca. 2011. “Unity and Diversity in Latin American Visions of Regional Integration.” In Latin American Foreign Policies: Between Ideology and Pragmatism, edited by Gian Luca Gardini and Peter Lambert, 235–254. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Geldenhuys, Deon. 2010. “South Africa: The Idea-Driven Foreign Policy of a Regional Power.” In Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, edited by Daniel Flemes, 151–167. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Matthew. 2012. “Foreign Policy in Transition: The ANC’s Search for a Foreign Policy Direction During South Africa’s Transition, 1990–1994.” The Round Table 101 (5): 405–423. doi: 10.1080/00358533.2012.713231
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Suzanne. 2016. Democratic South Africa’s Foreign Policy: Voting Behaviour in the United Nations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Häge, Frank, and Simon Hug. 2016. “Consensus Decisions and Similarity Measures in International Organizations.” International Interactions 42 (3): 503–529. doi: 10.1080/03050629.2016.1138107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrell, Andrew. 2010. “Regional Powers and the Global System From a Historical Perspective.” In Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, edited by Daniel Flemes, 15–27. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Job, Brian L. 2009. “Grappling with an Elusive Concept.” In Security Politics in the Asia-Pacific: A Regional-Global Nexus?, edited by William T. Tow, 31–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordaan, Eduard. 2017. “The Emerging Middle Power Concept: Time to say Goodbye?” South African Journal of International Affairs 24 (3): 395–412. doi: 10.1080/10220461.2017.1394218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacowicz, Arie M. 2018. “Regional Governance and Global Governance: Links and Explanations.” Global Governance 24 (1): 61–79. doi: 10.1163/19426720-02401005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapohl, Sebastian, Katharina L. Meissner, and Johannes Muntschick. 2014. “Regional Powers as Leaders or Rambos? The Ambivalent Behaviour of Brazil and South Africa in Regional Economic Integration.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (4): 879–895. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, Brian, and Vanessa A. Lefler. 2017. “Examining the Role of Region and Elections on Representation in the UN Security Council.” The Review of International Organizations 12: 585–611. doi: 10.1007/s11558-016-9254-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsberg, Chris, and David Monyae. 2006. “South Africa’s Foreign Policy: Carving a Global Niche.” South African Journal of International Affairs 13 (2): 131–145. doi: 10.1080/10220460609556807
   Google Scholar
• Lazarou, Elena, and Bruno Theodoro Luciano. 2015. “Regionalism as an Instrument: Assessing Brazil’s Relations with its Neighbourhood.” Global Society 29 (3): 390–408. doi: 10.1080/13600826.2015.1039500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malamud, Andrés. 2011. “A Leader Without Followers? The Growing Divergence Between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy.” Latin American Politics and Society 53 (3): 1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00123.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malamud, Andrés, and Júlio César Cossio Rodriguez. 2014. “Straddling the Region and the World: Brazil’s Dual Foreign Policy Comes of age.” In The Role, Position and Agency of Cusp States in International Relations, edited by Marc Herzog and Philip Robins, 111–128. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mashabane, Doctor. 2018. “South Africa and the United Nations.” In Foreign Policy in Post-Apartheid Africa: Security, Diplomacy and Trade, edited by Adekeye Adebajo and Kudrat Virk, 395–410. Cape Town: I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, Michaela, Brett Ashley Leeds, and Royce Carroll. 2015. “Leadership Turnover and Foreign Policy Change: Societal Interests, Domestic Institutions, and Voting in the United Nations.” International Studies Quarterly 59 (2): 280–290. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesquita, Rafael. 2019. “Introducing the Rising Powers Diplomatic Network (RPDN): A Dataset for Rising Powers’ Presidential Diplomacy and Diplomatic Presence Abroad.” Rising Powers Quarterly 3 (4): 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Mesquita, Rafael, and Marcelo de A, Medeiros. 2016. “Legitimising Emerging Power Diplomacy: an Analysis of Government and Media Discourses on Brazilian Foreign Policy Under Lula.” Contexto Internacional 38 (1): 385–432. doi: 10.1590/S0102-8529.2016380100011
   Google Scholar
• Montenegro, Renan Holanda, and Rafael Mesquita. 2017. “Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and Their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly.” Brazilian Political Science Review 11 (2): 1–32. doi: 10.1590/1981-3821201700020005
   Google Scholar
• Nel, Philip. 2010. “Redistribution and Recognition: What Emerging Regional Powers Want.” Review of International Studies 36 (4): 951–974. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510001385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolte, Detlef. 2010. “How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics.” Review of International Studies 36 (4): 881–901. doi: 10.1017/S026021051000135X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. J. 2006. The UN General Assembly. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prys, Miriam. 2009. “Regional Hegemon or Regional Bystander: South Africa’s Zimbabwe Policy 2000–2005.” Politikon 36 (2): 193–218. doi: 10.1080/02589340903240138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prys, Miriam. 2010. “Hegemony, Domination, Detachment: Differences in Regional Powerhood.” International Studies Review 12 (4): 479–504. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00957.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanahuja, José António. 2012. “Regionalismo Post-Liberal Y Multilateralismo En Sudamérica: el Caso De UNASUR.” In Anuario De La Integración Regional De América Latina Y El Gran Caribe, edited by Andrés Serbin, Laneydi Martínez, and Haroldo Ramanzini Júnior, 19–72. Buenos Aires: CRIES.
   Google Scholar
• Schirm, Stefan. 2010. “Leaders in Need of Followers: Emerging Powers in Global Governance.” European Journal of International Relations 16 (2): 197–221. doi: 10.1177/1354066109342922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholvin, Sören. 2013. “From Rejection to Acceptance: The Conditions of Regional Contestation and Followership to Post-Apartheid South Africa.” African Security 6 (2): 133–152. doi: 10.1080/19392206.2013.788409
   Google Scholar
• Seabra, Pedro, and Edalina Rodrigues Sanches. 2019. “South–South Cohesiveness Versus South–South Rhetoric: Brazil and Africa at the UN General Assembly.” International Politics 56 (5): 585–604. doi: 10.1057/s41311-018-0170-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrão, Olivier, and Paul-Henri Bischoff. 2009. “Foreign Policy Ambiguity on the Part of an Emergent Middle Power: South African Foreign Policy Through Other Lenses.” Politikon 36 (3): 363–380. doi: 10.1080/02589341003600189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidiropoulos, Elizabeth. 2008. “South African Foreign Policy in the Post-Mbeki Period.” South African Journal of International Affairs 15 (2): 107–120. doi: 10.1080/10220460802636158
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Karen. 2018. “South Africa: Still an Ambivalent (Sub)Regional Leader?” In Regional Powers and Contested Leadership, edited by Hannes Ebert and Daniel Flemes, 113–136. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Soares de Lima, Maria Regina and Mônica Hirst. 2006. “Brazil as an Intermediate State and Regional Power: Action, Choice and Responsibilities.” International Affairs 82 (1): 21–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00513.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, Andrea, Marcelo de A Medeiros, and Rafael M. Lima. 2014. “From Tegucigalpa to Teheran: Brazil’s Diplomacy as an Emerging Western Country.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 57 (1): 40–58. doi: 10.1590/0034-7329201400103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigevani, Tullo, and Gabriel Cepaluni. 2011. A Política Externa Brasileira: a Busca da Autonomia, de Sarney a Lula. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.
   Google Scholar
• Westhuizen, Janis van der. 2016. “Brazil and South Africa: the ‘odd Couple’ of the South Atlantic?” Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 54 (2): 232–251. doi: 10.1080/14662043.2016.1151169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar