Advanced search
Publication Cover
Asian Journal of Public Administration Volume 24, 2002 - Issue 1
Journal homepage
18
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Privatisation Cube Paradox: Focusing on Processes or Generic Types?

Humphry HungView further author information
Pages 139-146 | Published online: 25 Feb 2014

References

  • Bacharach. S B 1989. “Organization theories: some criteria for evaluation,” Academy of Management Review. 14.
  • Blalock. H M 1969. Theory Construction: From Verbal to Mathematical Formulations. Englewood Cliffs. NE Prentice Hall.
  • Butler, R 1997. “Stones and experiments in social inquiry,” Organisation Studies, 18(6).
  • Carper, W B & Snizek, W E 1980. “The nature and types of organisationsal taxonomies: an overview,” Academy of Management Review, 5.
  • Doty, D H & Glick, W H 1994. “Typologies as a unique form of theory building: toward improved understanding and modeling,” Academy of Management Review, 19(2).
  • Drazin. R & Van de Ven, A H 1985. “Alternate forms of fit in contingency theory,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 3D.
  • Fabian, F H 2000. “Keeping the tension: pressures to keep the controversy in the management discipline,” Academy of Management Review, 25(2).
  • Higgins, M C & Kram, K E 2001. “Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: a developmental network perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 26(2).
  • Hung, H 2000. “An analytical framework of the boundaries of privatisation: the privatisation cube,” As7aw Journal of Public Administration, 22(1).
  • McKinney, K D 1966. Constructive Typology and Social Theory. New York: Appelton-Century Crofts.
  • Segev, E 1989. “A systemic comparative analysis and syntheses of two business-level strategic typologies,” Strategic Management Journal, 10.
  • Wettenhall. R 1998a. “Privatisation in Australia: how much and what impacts” Asian Review of Public Administration, 10(1–2).
  • Wettenhall. R 1998b. “What's public? What's private? Public corporations, companies, and the decline of middle ground,” presented at the IASIA Annual Conference, September 14–17, 1998.
  • Wettenhall. R 2001. “How ubiquitous is privatisation? The Hung cube and the components of organisational change,” Asian Journal of Public Administration. 23(1).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.