Pushing the boundaries of self-directed learning: research findings from a study of u.lab participants in Scotland

References

• Bajraktari, F., Mosse, R., & Voto, G. N. (2016) Transforming u.lab: Re-designing a participatory methodology using a strategic sustainable perspective (Master’s dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.divaportal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A955129&dswid=−3133
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chlopczik, A. (2014a). Magic moments – Otto Scharmer’s Theory U and its implications for personal and organizational development. Gestalt Theory, 36(3), 267–278.
   Google Scholar
• Chlopczik, A. (2014b). Conscious change, change in consciousness: Prototyping our interior condition. In S. Sharma & M. Zirkler (Eds.), From the edge of chaos: Dialogues amongst social theory and practice (pp.48-57). Bengaluru, India: IBA Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dirkx, J. M. (2001).The power of feelings: Emotion, imagination, and the construction of meaning in adult learning. In New directions for adult and continuing education. Spring(89), 63-72.
   Google Scholar
• Dirkx, J. M. (2012). Nurturing soul work: A Jungian approach to transformative learning. In E. W. Taylor & P. Cranton (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 116-130). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Garder, S., & Paulin, S. (2018). The journey of self, nature, technology and sustainable organizational design: Insights for transformative leadership Praxis. In M. Brueckner, R. Spencer, & M. Paull (Eds.), Disciplining the undisciplined? Perspectives from business, society and politics on responsible citizenship, corporate social responsibility and sustainability (pp. 253-254). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnlaugson, O. (2008). Metatheoretical prospects for the field of transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 6(2), 124–135.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnlaugson, O., Baron, C., & Cayer, M. (Eds.). (2014). Perspectives on Theory U: Insights from the field. Hershey, PA: Business Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. (2008). Inside the Theory of U: Interview with Peter M. Senge and Otto Scharmer (part 2). Reflections / Sigma Theta Tau, 9(1),  6-11.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, L. (2014). Opening space through contemplative practices: How facilitators foster a field of collective learning. In O. Gunnlaugson, C. Baron, & M. Cayer (Eds.), Perspectives on Theory U: Insights from the field (pp. 181-192). Hershey, PA: IGI.
   Google Scholar
• Heron, J. (1999). The complete facilitator’s handbook. London: Kogan Page Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Illeris, K. (2003). Towards a contemporary and comprehensive theory of learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(4), 396–406.
   Google Scholar
• Illeris, K. (2009). A comprehensive understanding of human learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists…in their own words (pp. 7-20). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Illeris, K. (2014). Transformative learning and identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Illeris, K. (2017). How we learn: Learning and non-learning in school and beyond (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keegan, R. (2009). What “form” transforms? In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists…in their own words (pp. 35-52). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 90(Spring), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. (2013). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, E., Morrell, A., & O’Conner, M. A. (2002). Expanding the boundaries of transformative learning: Essays on theory and praxis. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Page, I. (2018). Social technology and Theory U: Co-creating actionable knowledge for leadership. In A. König (Ed.), Sustainability science: Key issues (pp. 133-146). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Presencing Institute. (2015a). U.school vision paper. Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from https://uschool.presencing.com/sites/default/files/u.school_Vision.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Presencing Institute. (2015b). Case clinic guidelines. Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from https://www.presencing.org/files/tools/PI_Tool_CaseClinic.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reams, J. (2007). Illuminating the blind spot: An overview and response to Theory U. Integral Review, 5, 240-259.
   Google Scholar
• Rege-Colet, N. M. (2016). From content-centred to learning-centred approaches: Shifting educational paradigm in higher education. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 49(1), 72–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharmer, C. O. (2015a, May 4). MOOC 4.0: The next revolution in learning & leadership. Huffington Post. Retrieved from
   Google Scholar
• Scharmer, C. O. (2015b, December 22). Education as activating social fields. Huffington Post. Retrieved from
   Google Scholar
• Scharmer, C. O. (2018). The essentials of Theory U: Core principles and applications. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Scharmer, O. (2016). Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges (2nd ed.). Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Scharmer, O., & Kaufer, K. (2013). Leading from the emerging future: From ego-system to eco-system economies. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, S., & Winslow. (2013b). 30 years of building learning communities: A dialogue with Peter Senge, Otto Scharmer and Darcy Winslow, Part 2. Reflections / Sigma Theta Tau, 13(2), 40-52.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, S., & Winslow. (2013a). 30 years of building learning communities: A dialogue with Peter Senge, Otto Scharmer and Darcy Winslow, Part 1. Reflections / Sigma Theta Tau, 12(4), 1-9.
   Google Scholar
• Sohmen, V. (2016). Change management and Theory U leadership. International Journal of Global Business, 9(2), 102–110.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, A. (2015). Inspiring space, place, and U.lab: A personal reflection on the Presencing Institute’s Foundations Program in Cape Town, South Africa. Integral Leadership Review, 6/16. Retrieved from http://0eds.b.ebscohost.com.mercury.concordia.ca/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=c9e43a47-93da41669bc4965ea7c25c2d%40sessionmgr101&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#AN=111382624&db=bth
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E., & Cranton, P. (Eds.). (2012). The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research & practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant, M. (2006). Psychology and adult learning (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tidell, E. (2012). Themes and variations of transformational learning. In E. Taylor & P. Cranton (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research & practice (pp. 21-37). San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• u.lab Scotland. (2017). U.lab Scotland – Sharing our story. Edinburgh, UK: K. Oliver & K. Deacon.
   Google Scholar
• Wanasika, I., & Krahnke, K. (2017). Leadership and vision. In J. Marques & S. Dhiman (Eds.), Leadership today: Practices for personal and professional performance (pp. 75-88). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. (2017). Otto Scharmer and the field of the future: Integrating science, spirituality, and profound social change. In D. Szabla, W. Pasmore, M. Barnes, & A. Gipson (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of organizational change thinkers (pp. 1129-1146) London, U.K.: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar