Towards a network governance of European lifelong learning: a structural analysis of Commission expert groups

References

• ALTER-EU. (2008). Secrecy and corporate dominance - a study on the composition and transparency of European commission expert groups. Brussels: Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation in the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2013). A theory of governance. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2019). Governance. In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from https://academic-eb-com.ezproxy.nottingham.ac.uk/levels/collegiate/article/governance/600930
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N., & Börzel, T. A. (2010). Non-hierarchical policy coordination in multilevel systems. European Political Science Review, 2(2), 157–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. (2002). NetDraw: Graph visualization software. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2009). Council conclusions of 12 May 2009 on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (‘ET 2020ʹ). Retrieved from http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/education_benchmarks_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2011). Council resolution on a renewed European agenda for adult learning 2011/C 372/01. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32011G1220(01)&from=IT
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2015). 2015 Joint report of the council and the commission on the implementation of the strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (ET 2020) — new priorities for European cooperation in education and training. C 417/25. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015XG1215(02)
   Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, H. A., & Hufen, E. (1998). A contextual approach to policy instruments. In B. Peters & F. K. M. van Nispen (Eds.), Public policy instruments: Evaluating the tools of public administration (pp. 69–84). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Enroth, H. (2011). Policy network theory. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of governance (pp. 19–35). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2006). Communication from the commission - adult learning: It is never too late to learn. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2007). Action plan on adult learning. It is always a good time to learn. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). Education and training 2020. Working group mandates 2016–2018. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/policy/strategic-framework/expert-groups/documents/et2020-mandates_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). Register of commission expert groups and other similar entities. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2008). European parliament resolution of 16 January 2008 on adult learning: It is never too late to learn. (2007/2114(INI)). Retrieved from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7fce5d1f-a50e-4900-ac09-f99a3108939c
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å. (2015). ‘All in’? Patterns of participation in EU education policy. In M. Souto-Otero (Ed.), Evaluating European education policy-making (pp. 92–123). Bakingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å., & Sverdrup, U. (2010). Enlightened decision making? The role of scientists in EU governance. Politique Europénne, 32(3), 125–149.
   Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å., & Sverdrup, U. (2011). Access of experts: Information and EU decision-making. West European Politics, 34(1), 48–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E. M., Kahler, M., & Montgomery, A. H. (2009). Net- work analysis for international relations. International Organization, 63(3), 559–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Montgomery, A. H. (2010). Centrality in Politics: How Networks Confer Power. Political Networks Conference 2010. Southern Illinois University. 22 June 2018, Retrieved from http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/pnconfs_2010/9
   Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California. Retrieved from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/
   Google Scholar
• Hellström, T., & Jacob, M. (2017). Policy instrument affordances: A framework for analysis. Policy Studies, 38(6), 604–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A. (2002). New modes of governance in Europe: Policy making without legislating? Political Science Series, 81. https://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_81.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1997). The governance of complexity and the complexity of governance: Preliminary remarks on some problems and limits of economic guidance. In A. Amin & J. Hausner (Eds.), Beyond market and hierarchy: Interactive governance and social complexity (pp. 111–147). Cheltenman: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Schout, A. (2006). The coordination of the European Union: Exploring the capacities of networked governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B. (2005). European governance and system integration. European Governance Papers (EUROGOV)(Vol. C-05-01).
   Google Scholar
• Lake, D. A., & Wong, W. H. (2009). The politics of networks: Interests, power, and human rights norms. In M. Kahler (Ed.), Networked politics: Agency, power, and governance (pp. 127–150). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments - from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawn, M. (2011). Standardizing the European education policy space. European Educational Research Journal, 10(2), 259–272.
   Google Scholar
• Lawn, M., & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing education: Governing a new policy space. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M. (2014). The rewards of cooperation: The effects of membership in European regulatory networks. European Journal of Political Research, 53(3), 480–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, J. (2013). Expert groups in the European Union: A sui generis phenomenon? Policy and Society, 32(3), 267–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milana, M., & Holford, J. (Eds.). (2014). Adult education policy and the european union: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Milana, M, Tronca, L, & Klatt, G. (2019). European governance in adult education: On the comparative advantage of joining working groups and networks. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 1–27).
   Google Scholar
• Nóvoa, A., & Lawn, M. (2002). Fabricating Europe: The formation of an education space. London: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou, N. (2019). Best practice as a governing practice: Producing best practice in a European Commission working group. Journal of Education Policy, 1–22. pre-published online.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, XLIV(4), 652–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2000). New governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28(5), 1611–1674.
   Google Scholar
• Sandstrom, A., & Carlsson, L. (2008). The performance of policy networks: The relation between network structure and network performance. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 497–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, G. F. (2003). Between hierarchies and markets. The logic and limits of network forms of organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar