832
Views
44
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Deriving individual student marks from a tutor’s assessment of group work

Pages 329-343 | Published online: 18 Jan 2007

References

  • Boud , J. , Cohen , R. and Sampson , J. 1999 . Peer learning and assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 24 (4) : 413 – 426 .
  • Conway , R. , Kember , D. , Sivan , A. and Wu , M. 1993 . Peer assessment of an individual’s contribution to a group project . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 18 (1) : 45 – 56 .
  • Earle , S. E. 1986 . Staff and peer assessment—measuring an individual’s contribution to group performance . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 11 (1) : 60 – 69 .
  • Falchikov , N. 1986 . Product comparison and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessments . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 11 (2) : 146 – 165 .
  • Goldfinch , J. and Raeside , R. 1990 . Development of a peer assessment technique for obtaining individual marks on a group project . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 15 (3) : 210 – 231 .
  • Goldfinch , J. 1994 . Further developments in peer assessment of group projects . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 19 (1) : 29 – 35 .
  • Hughes , I. E. and Large , B. J. 1993 . Staff and peer‐group assessment of oral communication skills . Studies in Higher Education , 18 (3) : 379 – 385 .
  • Johnson , D. W. and Johnson , P. F. 1975 . Joining together: group theory and group skills , New Jersey : Prentice Hall .
  • Lejk , M. , Wyvill , M. and Farrow , S. 1996 . A survey of methods of deriving individual grades from group assessments . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 21 (3) : 267 – 280 .
  • Lejk , M. , Wyvill , M. and Farrow , S. 1997 . Group learning and group assessment on undergraduate computing courses in higher education in the UK: results of a survey . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 22 (1) : 81 – 91 .
  • Lejk , M. and Wyvill , M. 2001a . Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: a comparison of holistic and category‐based approaches . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 26 (1) : 61 – 72 .
  • Lejk , M. and Wyvill , M. 2001b . The effect of the inclusion of self assessment with peer assessment of contributions to a group project: a quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 26 (6) : 551 – 561 .
  • Lejk , M. and Wyvill , M. 2002 . Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: student attitudes to holistic and category‐based approaches . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 27 (6) : 569 – 577 .
  • Nicolay , J. A. 2002 . Group assessment in the on‐line learning environment . New Directions for Teaching and Learning , 91 : 43 – 52 .
  • Payne , L. 1989 . A step towards group learning in computer programming . Computer Education , 63 : 23 – 25 .
  • Schlechtman , Z. 1991 . A revised group assessment procedure for predicting initial teaching success . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 51 (4) : 963 – 974 .
  • Thornton , S. C. and Byham , W. C. 1982 . Assessment centre and managerial performance , New York : Academic Press .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.