RateMyProfessors.com offers biased evaluations

References

• Anderson , H.M. , Cain , J. and Bird , E. 2005 . Online course evaluations: Review of literature and a pilot study . American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education , 69 : 34 – 43 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister , R.F. , Bratslavsky , E. , Finkenauer , C. and Vohs , K.D. 2001 . Bad is stronger than good . Review of General Psychology , 5 : 323 – 70 .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , M.J. , Baillie , M. and Fraser , S. 2009 . Rating RateMyProfessors.com: A comparison of online and official student evaluations of teaching . College Teaching , 57 : 89 – 92 .
   Google Scholar
• Centra , J.A. 2003 . Will teachers receive higher student ratings by giving higher grades and less course work? . Research in Higher Education , 44 : 495 – 518 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compete Site Analytics. 2010. Site profile for ratemyprofessor.com. http://siteanalytics.compete.com/ratemyprofessor.com/?metric=uv
   Google Scholar
• Davidson , E. and Price , J. 2009 . How do we rate? An evaluation of online student evaluations . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 34 : 51 – 65 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan , J. , Mader , C.E. and Shinsky , J. 2006 . Constructive student feedback: Online vs. traditional course evaluations . Journal of Interactive Online Learning , 5 : 283 – 96 .
   Google Scholar
• Edwards , A. , Edwards , C. , Shaver , C. and Oaks , M. 2009 . Computer‐mediated word‐of‐mouth communication on ratemyprofessors.com: Expectancy effects on student cognitive and behavioral learning . Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication , 14 : 368 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards , C. , Edwards , A. , Qing , Q. and Wahl , S.T. 2007 . The influence of computer‐mediated word‐of‐mouth communication on student perceptions of instructors and attitudes toward learning course content . Communication Education , 56 : 255 – 77 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman , K.A. 1976 . Grades and college students’ evaluations of their courses and teachers . Research in Higher Education , 4 : 69 – 111 .
   Google Scholar
• Felton , J. , Koper , P.T. , Mitchell , J. and Stinson , M. 2008 . Attractiveness, easiness and other issues: Student evaluations of professors on RateMyProfessors.com . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 33 : 45 – 61 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton , J. , Mitchell , J. and Stinson , M. 2004 . Web‐based student evaluations of professors: The relations between perceived quality, easiness and sexiness . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 29 : 91 – 108 .
   Google Scholar
• Fiske , S.T. , Lin , M. and Neuberg , S. 1999 . “ The continuum model: Ten years later ” . In Dual‐process models in social psychology , Edited by: Chaiken , S. and Trope , Y. 231 – 54 . New York : Guilford Press .
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald , A.G. and Gilmore , G.M. 1997 . Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings . American Psychologist , 52 : 1209 – 17 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurung , R.A.R. and Vespia , K.M. 2007 . Looking good, teaching well? Linking liking, looks and learning . Teaching of Psychology , 34 : 5 – 10 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto , J. , Sanford Jr , D.A. and Ross , D.N. 2008 . Does ratemyprofessor.com really rate my professor? . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 33 : 355 – 68 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remedios , R. and Lieberman , D.A. 2008 . I liked your course because you taught me well: The influence of grades, workload, expectations and goals on student evaluations of teaching . British Educational Research Journal , 34 : 91 – 115 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmerman , T. 2008 . On the validity of RateMyProfessors.com . Journal of Education for Business , 84 : 55 – 61 .
   Google Scholar
• Willis , J. and Todorov , A. 2006 . First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100‐ms exposure to a face . Psychological Science , 17 : 592 – 8 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar