Social moderation, assessment and assuring standards for accounting graduates

References

• AUQA (Australian Universities Quality Agency). 2009. Setting and Monitoring Academic Standards for Australian Higher Education: A Discussion Paper. www.auqa.edu.au/qualityenhancement/academicstandards/.
   Google Scholar
• Baume, D., M. Yorke, and M. Coffey. 2004. “What is Happening When We Assess, and How can We Use Our Understanding of this to Improve Assessment?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (4): 451–477.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S. 2009. “Marking and Moderation in the UK: False Assumption and Wasted Resources.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 209–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and P. Boyd. 2007. Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education: A Practical Guide. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., R. Cohen, and J. Sampson. 1999. “Peer Learning and Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (4): 413–426.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., et al. 2010. Assessment 2020: Seven Propositions for Assessment Reform in Higher Education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H. 2010. “Defining and Monitoring Academic Standards in Higher Education.” Higher Education Policy and Management 22 (1): 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, P. 1992. “Constructivism Revisited: A Search for Common Ground.” Educational Technology 33 (2): 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Collini, S. 2012. What are Universities for? London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. A. 1999. “Classroom Choices from a Cognitive Perspective on Peer Learning.” In Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, edited by A. M. O’Donnell and A. King, 215–233. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, L. O., A. Fejes, M. Abrandt-Dahlgren, and N. Trowald. 2009. “Grading Systems, Features of Assessment and Student’s Approaches to Learning.” Teaching in Higher Education 14 (2): 185–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, T. M., and D. J. Cunningham. 1996. “Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction.” In Educational Communications and Technology, edited by D. H. Jonassen, 170–199. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, K. 2001. “I Know a 2:1 When I See It: Understanding Criteria for Degree Classifications in Franchised University Programmes.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 25 (3): 301–313.
   Google Scholar
• Elton, L., and B. Johnston. 2002. Assessment in Universities: A Critical Review of Research. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., L. S. Fuchs, P. G. Mathes, and D. C. Simmons. 1997. “Peer-assisted Learning Strategies: Making Classrooms More Responsive to Diversity.” American Educational Research Journal 34: 174–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 2006. Valid Assessment. Victoria: Office of Learning and Teaching. http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/teachlearn/student/activity5_1a.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. L. 2009. International Trends in Establishing the Standards of Academic Achievement in Higher Education: An Independent Report and Analysis. Prepared for the Australian Universities Quality Agency (AUQA). http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/people/harris_docs/Intl_trends_standards_Harris_Aug09.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, J. 2000. Assessment in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• IFAC (International Federation of Accountants). 2010. IAESB 2010–2012 Strategy and Work Plan. New York: IFAC, April.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, P. T. 2006. “The Local Practices of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (4): 435–452.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, P. T., and M. Yorke. 2003. Assessment, Learning and Employability. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C., ed. 2009. The University and Its Disciplines. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, R. 1993. “Linking Results of Distinct Assessments.” Applied Measurement in Education 6 (1): 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, U. 2000. “Worlds Apart: Students’ Experiences of Learning Introductory Accounting.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 11 (4): 479–504.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, U., and J. H. F. Meyer. 2005. “Towards a Mapping of the Student World’: The Identification of Variation in Students’ Conceptions of, and Motivations to Learn, Introductory Accounting.” The British Accounting Review 37: 177–204.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, U., and R. Mladenovic. 2006a. “Reflections on Accounting Education Research: How Accounting Education Research on Approaches to Learning has Contributed to Educational Practice.” In Reflections on Accounting Education Research, edited by L. Murphy Smith, 46–56. Sarisota, FL: American Accounting Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, U., and R. Mladenovic. 2006b. “Developing New ‘World Views’: Threshold Concepts in Introductory Accounting.” In Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge, edited by J. H. F. Meyer and R. Land, 148–159. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nanjappa, A., and M. M. Grant. 2003. “Constructing on Constructivism: The Role of Technology.” Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education. Accessed June 30. http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume2No1/nanjappa.htm
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. 2000. “When Teaching Meets Learning: Design Principles and Strategies for Web-based Learning Environments That Support Knowledge Construction.” In Learning to Choose: Choosing to Learn. Proceedings of the 17th Annual ASCILITE Conference, edited by R. Sims, M. O’Reilly, and S. Sawkins, 17–28. Lismore: Southern Cross University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, S. 2007. “Assessment Moderation: Constructing the Marks and Constructing the Students.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (6): 645–656.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. 2005. “Assessment Standards: The Role of Communities of Practice and the Scholarship of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (3): 215–230.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., B. O’Donovan, C. Rust, and J. Carroll. 2008. “Assessment Standards: A Manifesto Change.” Brookes EJournal of Learning and Teaching 2 (3). http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/article/assessment_standards_a_manifesto_for_change/.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., and C. Rust. 1999. “The Experience of Introducing a Common Criteria Assessment Grid Across an Academic Department.” Quality in Higher Education 5 (2): 133–144.
   Google Scholar
• Read, B., B. Francis, and J. Robson. 2005. “Gender, Bias, Assessment and Feedback: Analyzing the Written Assessment of Undergraduate History Essays.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (3): 241–260.
   Google Scholar
• Reimann, N., K. Harman, A. Wilson, and L. McDowall. 2010. “Learning to Assess in Higher Education: A Collaborative Exploration of the Interplay of Formal and Informal Learning in the Academic Workplace.” Paper presented at Higher Education Close Up Conference, Lancaster, UK, July 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C. 2009a. “Assessment Standards: A Potential Role for Subject Networks.” Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education 8 (1): 124–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, C. 2009b. Assessment Standards Workshop. Oxford: Higher Education Academy. www.heacademy.ac.uk/hlst/events/detail/131109_assessment_standards_workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. 2007. “Perils in the Meticulous Specification of Goals and Assessment Criteria.” Assessment in Education 14 (3): 387–392.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. 2009. “Grade Integrity and the Representation of Academic Achievement.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (7): 807–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. 2010. “Fidelity as a Precondition for Integrity in Grading Academic Achievement.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (6): 727–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. 2011. “Academic Freedom, Achievement Standards and Professional Identity.” Quality in Higher Education 17 (1): 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. 2012. “Assuring Comparability of Achievement Standards in Higher Education: From Consensus Moderation to Calibration.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.714742.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpley, A. M., and C. F. Sharpley. 1981. “Peer Tutoring: A Review of the Literature.” Collected Original Resources in Education 5 (3): 7–C11.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, P. R. J. 1993. “Constructive Learning: The Role of the Learner.” In Designing Environments for Constructive Learning, edited by T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, and D. H. Jonassen, 291–313. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. 1990. Co-operative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E., and K. Coombe. 2006. “Quality and Qualms in the Marking of University Assignments by Sessional Staff: An Exploratory Study.” Higher Education 51 (1): 45–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, J., and K. Topping. 1999. “Collaborative Writing in Eight Year Olds: Comparing Cross Ability Role and Same Ability Reciprocal Role Pairing.” Journal of Research in Reading 22 (2): 154–179.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 1998. “Peer Assessment Between Students in College and University.” Review of Educational Research 68: 249–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 2003. Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility. In Optimizing New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards, edited by M. S. R. Segers, F. J. R. C. Dochy, and E. C. Cascallar, 55–87. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P. 2009. “Beyond Epistemological Essentialism: Academic Tribes in the 21st Century.” In The University and Its Disciplines, edited by C. Kreber, 181–196. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. 1992. “Educational Leverage from a Political Necessity: Implications of New Perspectives on Student Assessment for Chapter 1 Evaluation.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14 (2): 123–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. 1995. Competence-Based Assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M. 2008. Grading Student Achievement in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar