How does student peer review influence perceptions, engagement and academic outcomes? A case study

References

• Barbour, R. S. 2005. “Making Sense of Focus Groups.” Medical Education 39 (7): 742–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg, I., W. Admiraal, and A. Pilot. 2006. “Design Principles and Outcomes of Peer Assessment in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (3): 341–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., and C. Tang. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 1990. “Assessment and the Promotion of Academic Values.” Studies in Higher Education 15 (1): 101–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2000. “Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for the Learning Society.” Studies in Continuing Education 22 (2): 151–167.
   Google Scholar
• Brindley, C., and S. Scoffield. 1998. “Peer Assessment in Undergraduate Programmes.” Teaching in Higher Education 3 (1): 79–90.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, W., and M. Warren. 1997. “Having Second Thoughts: Student Perceptions Before and After a Peer Assessment Exercise.” Studies in Higher Education 22 (2): 233–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., M. Segers, and D. Sluijsmans. 1999. “The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-Assessment in Higher Education: A Review.” Studies in Higher Education 24 (3): 331–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 2005. Improving Assessment through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Fallows, S., and B. Chandramohan. 2001. “Multiple Approaches to Assessment: Reflections on Use of Tutor, Peer and Self-Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 6 (2): 229–246.
   Google Scholar
• Gehringer, E. F. 2001 “Electronic Peer Review and Peer Grading in Computer-Science Courses.” In Paper presented at the ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Gehringer, E. F., D. D. Chinn, M. A. Pérez-Quiñones, and M. A. Ardis. 2005. “Using Peer Review in Teaching Computing.” In Paper presented at the ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Halcomb, E. J., L. Gholizadeh, M. DiGiacomo, J. Phillips, and P. M. Davidson. 2007. “Literature Review: Considerations in Undertaking Focus Group Research with Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Groups.” Journal of Clinical Nursing 16 (6): 1000–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. G., and J. Liu. 2005. “Guiding Principles for Effective Peer Response.” ELT Journal 59 (1): 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hounsell, D., V. McCune, J. Hounsell, and J. Litjens. 2008. “The Quality of Guidance and Feedback to Students.” Higher Education Research & Development 27 (1): 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, K. L., R. Hartley, R. James, and C. McInnis. 2005. The First Year Experience in Australian Universities: Findings from a Decade of National Studies. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, N. F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K., and W. Baker. 2009. “To Give is Better Than to Receive: The Benefits of Peer Review to the Reviewer’s Own Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 18 (1): 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, R. A., and J. M. Pearce. 2007. “Praze: Innovating Teaching through Online Peer Review.” In Paper presented at the ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Singapore, December 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor, R., C. Baik, C. Asmar, and K. Wally. 2013. Good Feedback Practices: Prompts and Guidelines for Reviewing and Enhancing Feedback for Students. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, T. M. 1999. “The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Student Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (3): 265–289.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, Paul. 2003. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. 2nd ed. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. S. 2006. “The Academic Journal Review Process as a Framework for Student Developmental Peer Feedback.” Journal of Management Education 30 (2): 378–398.
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D. 2002. Establishing Learning Effects with Integrated Peer Assessment Tasks. Heslington: The Higher Education Academy. http://www.medev.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/resources/resourcedatabase/id437_establishing_learning_effects.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D. M. A., G. Moerkerke, J. J. G. Van Merrienboer, and F. J. Dochy. 2001. “Peer Assessment in Problem Based Learning.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 27 (2): 153–173.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2006. “Do Unto Others or Not: Equity in Feedback for Undergraduates.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (3): 365–377.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. 1998. “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3): 249–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickerman, P. 2009. “Student Perspectives on Formative Peer Assessment: An Attempt to Deepen Learning?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar