The different impact of a structured peer-assessment task in relation to university undergraduates’ initial writing skills

References

• Andrade, H. G. 2005. “Teaching with Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.” College Teaching 53 (1):27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. G., and Y. Du. 2005. “Student Perspectives on Rubric-Referenced Assessment.” Practical Assessment 10 (3):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Arter, J., and J. McTighe. 2001. Scoring Rubrics in the Classroom: Using Performance Criteria for Assessing and Improving Student Performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press/Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., K. Hughes, and A. Mylonas. 2002. “Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (5):427–441.
   Google Scholar
• Beins, B. C., and A. M. Beins. 2012. Effective Writing in Psychology: Papers, Posters, and Presentations, 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, K., C. D. Schunn, and R. W. Wilson. 2006. “Validity and Reliability of Scaffolded Peer Assessment of Writing from Instructor and Student Perspectives.” Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (4):891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., D. Gijbels, and M. Segers. 2006. “Learning and the Emerging New Assessment Culture.” In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional Psychology: Past, Present and Future Trends. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., and J. Goldfinch. 2000. “Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks.” Review of Educational Research 70 (3):287–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrándiz, A., E. Lafuente, J. C. Loredo-Narciandi, 2001. Lecturas de historia de la psicología. Madrid. España: Universidad Nacional Educación a Distancia.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner, J., and P. Hafner. 2003. “Quantitative Analysis of the Rubric as an Assessment Tool: an Empirical Study of Student Peer‐Group Rating.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (12):1509–1528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. R. 2011. “Peer Assessment in Large Undergraduate Classes: an Evaluation of a Procedure for Marking Laboratory Reports and a Review of Related Practices.” Advances in Physiology Education 35 (2):178–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A., and G. Svingby. 2007. “The Use of Scoring Rubrics: Reliability, Validity and Educational Consequences.” Educational Research Review 2 (2):130–144.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. 2011. “How Do Students of Diverse Achievement Levels Benefit from Peer Assessment?.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 5 (2)
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., and F. Gao. 2016. “The Effect of Peer Assessment on Project Performance of Students at Different Learning Levels.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (6):885–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Y. Xiong, X. Zang, M. L. Kornhaber, Y. Lyu, K. S. Chung, and H. K. Suen. 2016. “Peer Assessment in the Digital Age: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Ratings.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (2):245–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, J. F., A. Boni, J. Peris, and A. Hueso. 2012. “Competencies in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis from the Capabilities Approach.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (1):132–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., and A. Jonsson. 2013. “The Use of Scoring Rubrics for Formative Assessment Purposes Revisited: A Review.” Educational Research Review 9:129–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., M. Romero, and J. W. Strijbos. 2013. “The Impact of a Rubric and Friendship on Peer Assessment: Effects on Construct Validity, Performance, and Perceptions of Fairness and Comfort.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 39 (4):195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, Y. M., and H. Andrade. 2010. “A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (4):435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Keefer, L. 2010. Rubric-referenced assessment in teacher preparation: An opportunity to learn by using. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 15(8):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. S. 2004. Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, J. R., Y. Song, W. Brantley, and O. L. Liu. 2014. “Assessing Written Communication in Higher Education: Review and Recommendations for Next‐Generation Assessment.” ETS Research Report Series 2014 (2):1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. 2001. Student-Involved Classroom Assessment (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Stockdale, S. L., and R. L. Williams. 2004. “Cooperative Learning Groups at the College Level: Differential Effects on High, Average, and Low Exam Performers.” Journal of Behavioral Education 13 (1):37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. 2017. “The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education.” Research in Science Education :1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 1998. “Peer Assessment Between Students in College and University.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3):249–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. 2003. Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimizing new modes of assessment: in search of qualities and standards. (pp. 55–87). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 2005. “Trends in Peer Learning.” Educational Psychology 25 (6):631–645.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 2009. “Peer Assessment.” Theory into Practice 48 (1):20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, Y. C., and M. T. Chuang. 2013. “Fostering Revision of Argumentative Writing through Structured Peer Assessment.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 116 (1):210–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickerman, P. 2009. “Student Perspectives on Formative Peer Assessment: an Attempt to Deepen Learning?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2):221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., K. Nemer, A. Chizhik, and B. Sugrue. 1998. “Equity Issues in Collaborative Group Assessment: Group Composition and Performance.” American Educational Research Journal 35 (4):607–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, M. L., and C. C. Tsai. 2006. “University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes toward (Online) Peer Assessment.” Higher Education 51 (1):27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. L., E. Carroll, and B. Hautau. 2005. “Individual Accountability in Cooperative Learning Groups at the College Level: Differential Effects on High, Average, and Low Exam Performers.” Journal of Behavioral Education 14 (3):167–188.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y., and R. Lucking. 2008. “The Impact of Two Types of Peer Assessment on Students' Performance and Satisfaction Within a Wiki Environment.” The Internet and Higher Education 11 (3-4):186–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, H., and Y. Yang. 2011. “Prospective Teachers’ Insights towards Scaffolding Students’ Writing Processes Through Teacher-Student Role Reversal in an Online System.” Educational Technology Research and Development 59 (3):351–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, M. C. 2007. “Differences in Learning and Study Strategies between High and Low Achieving University Students: A Hong Kong Study.” Educational Psychology 27 (5):597–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar