The use of exemplars in English writing classrooms: from theory to practice

References

• Andrade, H., K. Huff, and G. Brooke. 2012. Assessing learning: the students at the center series. New England: The Nellie Mae Education Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Badger, R., and G. White. 2000. “A Process Genre Approach to Teaching Writing.” ELT Journal 54 (2): 153–60.
   Google Scholar
• Berkenkotter, C., and T. Huckin. 1995. Genre knowledge in disciplinarycommunication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and L. Campbell. 2010. “Generating Dialogue in Assessment Feedback: Exploring the Use of Interactive Cover Sheets.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2013. Sustainable feedback and the development of student self-evaluative capacities. In S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless, & M. Taras (Eds.), Reconceptualising feedback in higher education. (pp. 117–126). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2015. Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2016. “Feedback as Dialogue.” Encyclopaedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory: 1–6. Retrieved at http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_389-1
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., and K. K. H. Chan. 2017. “Managing Dialogic Use of Exemplars.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (6): 930–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., and D. Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., K. K. H. Chan, J. To, M. Lo, and E. Barrett. 2018. Developing students’ capacities for evaluative judgement through analysing exemplars. In D. Boud, R. Ajjawi, P. Dawson and J. Tai (Eds), Developing evaluative judgement in higher education: Assessment for knowing and producing quality work. (pp. 108–116). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W. 2017. “Three Paradigms of Classroom Assessment: Implications for Written Feedback Research.” Language Assessment Quarterly : 1. Advanced online publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, I. 2018. “Interplay among Technical, Socio-Emotional and Personal Factors in Written Feedback Research.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (2): 185–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, L. M. 2013. Assessment for learning; Assessment as learning: Changing practices means changing beliefs. In Hong Kong Education Bureau (Ed.), Assessment and learning. (Issue 2) (pp. 1–5). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R., Y. Rand, and J. Rynders. 1988. Don’t accept me as I am. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. 1979. “Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring:A New Area of Cognitive–Developmental Inquiry.” American Psychologist 34 (10): 906–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J. 1993. “An Educational, or Process, Approach to the Teaching of Professional Genres.” ELT Journal 47 (4): 305–16.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, G., and J. Anderson. 2013. “Helping Students Understand the Standards of Work Expected in an Essay: Using Exemplars in Mathematics Pre-Service Education Classes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 754–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, G. D., and M. Tomitsch. 2014. “Implementing an Exemplar-Based Approach in an Interaction Design Subject: Enhancing Students’ Awareness of the Need to Be Creative.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 24 (3): 337–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, G. D., P. White, and C. Herbert. 2016. “Providing Exemplar-Based ‘Feedforward’ before an Assessment: The Role of Teacher Explanation.” Active Learning in Higher Education 17 (2): 99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsell, D. 2008. The trouble with feedback: New challenges, emerging strategies. International change, Spring. http://www.docs.hss.ed.ac.uk/iad/Learning_teaching/Academic_teaching/Resources/Interchange/spring2008.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2004. Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2007. “Genre Pedagogy: Language, Literacy and L2 Writing Instruction.” Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (3): 148–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2015. Teaching and researching writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. 1985. The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. 2007. “Feedback in Hong Kong Secondary Writing Classrooms: Assessment for Learning or Assessment of Learning?” Assessing Writing 12 (3): 180–98.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. 2014. “Revisiting Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing from Sociocultural Perspectives.” TESOL Quarterly 48 (1): 201–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. 2017. Classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda, P. K. 2003. “Process and Post-Process: A Discursive History.” Journal of Second Language Writing 12 (1): 65–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, E., F. Borrell-Carrió, and R. Epstein. 2013. The impact of emotions in feedback. In S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless, & M. Taras (Eds.), Reconceptualising feedback in higher education. (pp. 50–71). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donovan, B., M. Price, and C. Rust. 2008. “Developing Student Understanding of Assessment Standards: A Nested Hierarchy of Approaches.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (2): 205–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and K. Reiling. 2002. “The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback When Using Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self- Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (4): 309–23.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, M. C., M. N. Brock, and F. Yue. 1996. “Explaining Hong Kong Students' Response to Process Writing: An Exploration of Causes and Outcomes.” Journal of Second Language Writing 5 (3): 227–52.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1958. 1962). Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Presseisen, B. Z. 1992. February). Implementing thinking in the school’s curriculum. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Association for Cognitive Education, Riverside, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2010. “Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 535–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. 2009. “A Conceptual Analysis of Five Measures of Metacognitive Monitoring.” Metacognition and Learning 4 (1): 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoles, J., M. Huxham, and J. McArthur. 2013. “No Longer Exempt from Good Practice: Using Exemplars to Close the Feedback Gap for Exams.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 631–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. D., K. Worsfold, L. Davies, R. Fisher, and R. McPhail. 2013. “Assessment Literacy and Student Learning: The Case for Explicitly Developing Students’ ‘Assessment Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (1): 44–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. 2018. “Written Corrective Feedback from Sociocultural Theoretical Perspectives: A Research Agenda.” Language Teaching 51 (02): 262–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susser, B. 1994. “Process Approaches in ESL/EFL Writing Instruction.” Journal of Second Language Writing 3: 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., P. Kinnear, and L. Steinman. 2015. Sociocultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives. (2nd ed.). Bristol, HK: Multilingual Matters
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tai, J., R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, P. Dawson, and E. Panadero. 2018. “Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions about the Quality of Work.” Higher Education 76 (3): 467–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribble, C. 1996. Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1987. Thinking and speech. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Wenden, A. L. 1998. “Metacognitive Knowledge and Language Learning.” Applied Linguistics 19 (4): 515–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingate, U. 2010. “The Impact of Formative Feedback on the Development of Academic Writing.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 519–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, D., and M. Lewis. 1997. Extending literacy: Children reading and writing non- fiction. Psychology Press, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R. E. 1978. Paradigms and problems: Needed research in rhetorical invention. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure. (pp. 29–48). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Yucel, R., F. L. Bird, J. Young, and T. Blanksby. 2014. “The Road to Self-Assessment: Exemplar Marking before Peer Review Develops First Year Students’ Capacity to Judge the Quality of a Scientific Report.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (8): 971–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar