Developing a procedure for learning and assessing peer review in a forensic science programme

References

• Ballantyne, K. N., G. Edmond, and B. Found. 2017. “Peer Review in Forensic Science.” Forensic Science International 277:66–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., K. Hughes, and A. Mylonas. 2002. “Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (5):427–441.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., and C. Tang. 2007. Teaching for quality learning at University. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 1990. “Assessment and the Promotion of Academic Values.” Studies in Higher Education 15 (1):101–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, K.-H., and H.-T. Hou. 2015. “Exploring Students’ Behavioural Patterns during Online Peer Assessment from the Affective, Cognitive, and Metacognitive Perspectives: A Progressive Sequential Analysis.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 24 (2):171–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, W., and M. Warren. 1999. “Peer and Teacher Assessment of the Oral and Written Tasks of a Group Project.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (3):301–314.
   Google Scholar
• Cosbey, S., S. Elliott, and S. Paterson. 2017. “The United Kingdom and Ireland Association of Forensic Toxicologists; Establishing Best Practice for Professional Training & Development in Forensic Toxicology.” Science & Justice: Journal of the Forensic Science Society 57 (1):63–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dann, K. 2001. “Commentary on Peer Assessment: A Missing Link between Teaching and Learning? A Review of the Literature.” Nurse Education Today 21 (7):513–515.
   Google Scholar
• Dinis-Oliveira, R. J., and T. Magalhães. 2016. “Teaching and Learning Based on Peer Review: A Realistic Approach in Forensic Sciences.” F1000Research 5:1048.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dochy, F., M. Segers, and D. Sluijsmans. 1999. “The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-Assessment in Higher Education: A Review.” Studies in Higher Education 24 (3):331–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. P., D. W. S. Stephen, and S. Paterson. 2018. “The United Kingdom and Ireland Association of Forensic Toxicologists Forensic Toxicology Laboratory Guidelines (2018).” Science & Justice 58 (5):335–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evison, M. P. 2018. “Forensic Science Policy and the Question of Governmental University Research Quality Assessment.” Forensic Science International 290:279–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 1995. “Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment.” Innovations in Education and Training International 32 (2):175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., and J. Goldfinch. 2000. “Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks.” Review of Educational Research 70 (3):287–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, R. J. 2018. “Cut Costs at All Costs!.” Forensic Science International 290:e26–e28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatfield, T. 1999. “Examining Student Satisfaction with Group Projects and Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (4):365–377.
   Google Scholar
• Gielen, M., and B. De Wever. 2015. “Structuring the Peer Assessment Process: A Multilevel Approach for the Impact on Product Improvement and Peer Feedback Quality.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 31 (5):435–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielen, S., E. Peeters, F. Dochy, P. Onghena, and K. Struyven. 2010. “Improving the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback for Learning.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4):304–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillham, B. 2005. Research interviewing: The range of techniques. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gopee, N. 2001. “The Role of Peer Assessment and Peer Review in Nursing.” British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing) 10 (2):115–121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamnett, H. J., and A.-S. Korb. 2017. “The Coffee Project Revisited: Teaching Research Skills to Forensic Chemists.” Journal of Chemical Education 94 (4):445–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamnett, H. J., A. E. McKie, and C. M. Morrison. 2018. “Postgraduate Students’ Attitudes towards Group Work: Experiences within a Forensic Chemistry Programme.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 19 (4):1240–1252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanrahan, S. J., and G. Isaacs. 2001. “Assessing Self- and Peer-Assessment: The Students’ Views.” Higher Education Research & Development 20 (1):53–70.
   Google Scholar
• Harland, T., N. Wald, and H. Randhawa. 2017. “Student Peer Review: Enhancing Formative Feedback with a Rebuttal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (5):801–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylings, D. J., and L. A. J. Stefani. 1997. “Peer Assessment Feedback Marking in a Large Medical Anatomy Class.” Medical Education 31 (4):281–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation. 2014. ILAC-G19: 08/2014. Modules in a forensic science process. Silverwater: ILAC.
   Google Scholar
• Jeanguenat, A. M., B. Budowle, and I. E. Dror. 2017. “Strengthening Forensic DNA Decision Making through a Better Understanding of the Influence of Cognitive Bias.” Science & Justice 57 (6):415–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardos, R. L., J. M. Cook, R. J. Butson, and T. B. Kardos. 2009. “The Development of an Eportfolio for Life-Long Reflective Learning and Auditable Professional Certification.” European Journal of Dental Education 13 (3):135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, J., and D. Smith. 1993. “The Discipline of Teams.” Harvard Business Review 71 (2):111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutson, C. C., M. N. Jackson, M. Beekman, M. E. Carnes, D. W. Johnson, D. C. Johnson, and D. A. Keszler. 2014. “Mentoring Graduate Students in Research and Teaching by Utilizing Research as a Template.” Journal of Chemical Education 91 (2):200–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., and A. L. Steckelberg. 2006. “Perceptions of Web-Mediated Peer Assessment.” Academic Exchange Quarterly 10 (2):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, N.-F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3):279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennell, J. 2006. “The Future of Forensic and Crime Scene Science: Part II. A UK Perspective on Forensic Science Education.” Forensic Science International 157 (Supplement S1):S3–S20.
   Google Scholar
• Milchak, J. L., R. L. Shanahan, and J. A. Kerzee. 2012. “Implementation of a Peer Review Process to Improve Documentation Consistency of Care Process Indicators in the EMR in a Primary Care Setting.” Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 18 (1):46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. 2001. “Peer Assessment: A Missing Link between Teaching and Learning? A Review of the Literature.” Nurse Education Today 21 (7):507–513.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulder, R. A., J. M. Pearce, and C. Baik. 2014. “Peer Review in Higher Education: Student Perceptions before and after Participation.” Active Learning in Higher Education 15 (2):157–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordberg, D. 2008. “Group Projects: More Learning? Less Fair? a Conundrum in Assessing Postgraduate Business Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (5):481–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and K. Reiling. 1996. “The Importance of Marking Criteria in the Use of Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 21 (3):239–250.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, J., R. Mulder, and C. Baik. 2009. Involving Students in Peer Review: Case Studies and Practical Strategies for University Teaching. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, P., B. Cleary, F. Painchaud, M. Storey, and D. German. 2012. “Contemporary Peer Review in Action: Lessons from Open Source Development.” IEEE Software 29 (6):56–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroter, S., N. Black, S. Evans, F. Godlee, L. Osorio, and R. Smith. 2008. “What Errors Do Peer Reviewers Detect, and Does Training Improve Their Ability to Detect Them?” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 101 (10):507–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 1998. “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3):249–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., E. F. Smith, I. Swanson, and A. Elliot. 2000. “Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing between Postgraduate Students.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (2):149–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-C., and J.-C. Liang. 2009. “The Development of Science Activities via on-Line Peer Assessment: The Role of Scientific Epistemological Views.” Instructional Science 37 (3):293–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UCAS 2018. “The Universities and Colleges Admissions Service.” Accessed 01 August. https://www.ucas.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Walkington, H., A. L. Griffin, L. Keys-Mathews, S. K. Metoyer, W. E. Miller, R. Baker, and D. France. 2011. “Embedding Research-Based Learning Early in the Undergraduate Geography Curriculum.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 35 (3):315–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, P. H. 2010. “Forensic Report Checklist.” Journal of Forensic Psychology 2:233–240.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, N., Y. Wu, T. Su, L. Zhang, K. Yin, D. Zheng, J. Zheng, L. Huang, Q. Wu, and J. Cheng. 2017. “Course Constructions: A Case-Base of Forensic Toxicology.” Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 50:36–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar