2,825
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Evaluating student satisfaction - restricting lecturer professionalism: outcomes of using the UK national student survey questionnaire for internal student evaluation of teaching

References

  • Alderman, L., S. Towers, and S. Bannah. 2012. “Student Feedback Systems in Higher Education: A Focused Literature Review and Environmental Scan.” Quality in Higher Education 18(3):261–280. doi: 10.1080/13538322.2012.730714.
  • Arthur, L. 2009. “From Performativity to Professionalism: Lecturers Responses to Student Feedback.” Journal of Teaching in Higher Education 14(4):441–454. doi: 10.1080/13562510903050228.
  • Ball, S. 2012. “Performativity, Commodification and Commitment: An I-Spy Guide to the Neoliberal University.” British Journal of Educational Studies 60(1):17–28. doi: 10.1080/00071005.2011.650940.
  • Ball, S. 2016. “Neoliberal Education? Confronting the Slouching Beast.” Policy Futures in Education 14(8):1046–1059. doi: 10.1177/1478210316664259.
  • Bamber, V., and S. Anderson. 2012. “Evaluating Learning and Teaching: Institutional Needs and Individual Practices.” International Journal for Academic Development 17(1):5–18. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2011.586459.
  • Bates, E., and L. Kaye. 2014. “I’d Be Expecting Caviar in Lectures’: The Impact of the New Fee Regime on Undergraduate Students’ Expectations of Higher Education.” Higher Education 67(5):655–673. doi: 10.1007/s10734-013-9671-3.
  • Bedggood, R. E., and J. D. Donovan. 2012. “University Performance Evaluations: What Are we Really Measuring?” Studies in Higher Education 37(7):825–842. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.549221.
  • Berk, R. A. 2013. “Top Five Flashpoints in the Assessment of Teaching Effectiveness.” Medical Teacher 35(1):15–26. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.732247.
  • Blackmore, J. 2009. “Academic Pedagogies, Quality Logics and Performative Universities: Evaluating Teaching and What Students Want.” Studies in Higher Education 34(8):857–872. doi: 10.1080/03075070902898664.
  • Botas, P. C. P., and R. Brown. 2013. “The not so ‘Holy Grail’: The impact of NSS feedback on the quality of teaching and learning in higher education in the UK.” In Enhancing Student Feedback and Improvement in Tertiary Education., edited by M. Shah and C.S. Nair, 45–56. Abu Dhabi: Commission for Academic Accreditation Quality Series No. 5.
  • Brennan, J., and M. David. 2010. Teaching, Learning and the Student Experience in UK Higher Education. In Higher Education and Society: A Research Report, 5–12. http://oro.open.ac.uk/21274/1/Higher_Education_and_Society.pdf. Accessed July 26, 2018.
  • Budd, R. 2017. “Undergraduate Orientations towards Higher Education in Germany and England: Problematizing the Notion of ‘Student as Customer.” Higher Education 73(1):23–37. doi: 10.1007/s10734-015-9977-4.
  • Buckley, A. 2012. Making It Count: Reflecting on the National Student Survey in the Process of Enhancement. York: Higher Education Academy.
  • Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. London: Sage [Database]
  • DBIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills 2016. ). Success as a Knowledge Economy: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/523396/bis-16-265-success-as-a-knowledge-economy.pdf. Accessed 22 February, 2018.
  • Denson, N., T. Loveday, and H. Dalton. 2010. “Student Evaluation of Courses: What Predicts Satisfaction?” Higher Education Research and Development 29(4):339–356. doi: 10.1080/07294360903394466.
  • Edstrőm, K. 2008. “Doing Course Evaluation as If Learning Matters Most.” Higher Education Research and Development 27(2):95–106.
  • Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory – Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Heaney, C., and H. Mackenzie. 2017. “The Teaching Excellence Framework: Perpetual Pedagogical Control in Postwelfare Capitalism.” Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching 10(2). doi:Accessed 10 April, 2018. doi: 10.21100/compass.v10i2.488.
  • HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England 2016a). HEFCE Circular letter 30/2016: A new National Student Survey for 2017. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2016/CL,302016/. Accessed 22 February, 2018.
  • HEFCE 2016b. Teaching Excellence Framework Year 2 Additional Guidance. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/2016/201632/HEFCE2016_32.pdf. Accessed 26 February, 2018.
  • HEFCE 2004. National Student Survey 2005: Outcomes of Consultation and Guidance on Next Steps. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120118171947/http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2004/04_33. Accessed 11 May, 2017.
  • Hoel, A., and T. Dahl. 2019. “Why Bother? Student Motivation to Participate in Student Evaluations of Teaching.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 44(3):361–378. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1511969.
  • Johnson, R. 2000. “The Authority of the Student Evaluation Questionnaire.” Teaching in Higher Education 5(4):419–434. doi: 10.1080/713699176.
  • Kane, D., L. Millard, and J. Williams. 2013. “Transforming the student experience in the UK from 1989”. In Enhancing Student Feedback and Improvement in Tertiary Education., edited by M. Shah and C.S. Nair, 57–75. Abu Dhabi: Commission for Academic Accreditation Quality Series No. 5.
  • Kember, D., D. Leung, and K. P. Kwan. 2002. “Does the Use of Student Feedback Questionnaires Improve the Overall Quality of Teaching?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27(5):411–425. doi: 10.1080/0260293022000009294.
  • Kenny, J. 2017. “Academic Work and Performativity.” Higher Education 74(5):897–913. doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0084-y.
  • Locke, K. 2015. “Performativity, Performance and Education.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 47(3):247–259. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2013.857287.
  • Moore, S., and N. Kuol. 2005. “Students Evaluating Teachers: Exploring the Importance of Faculty Reaction to Feedback on Teaching.” Teaching in Higher Education 10(1):57–73. doi: 10.1080/1356251052000305534.
  • Olssen, M., and M. Peters. 2005. “Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism.” Journal of Education Policy 20(3):313–345. doi: 10.1080/02680930500108718.
  • Richardson, J. 2005. “Instruments for Obtaining Student Feedback: A Review of the Literature.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 30(4):387–415. doi: 10.1080/02602930500099193.
  • Richardson, J. 2013. “The National Student Survey and its impact on UK Higher Education.” In Enhancing Student Feedback and Improvement in Tertiary Education., edited by M. Shah and C.S. Nair (pp. 76–84). Abu Dhabi: Commission for Academic Accreditation Quality Series No. 5.
  • Schuck, S.,. S. Gordon, and J. Buchanan. 2008. “What Are we Missing Here? Problematising Wisdoms on Teaching Quality and Professionalism in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 13(5):537–547. doi: 10.1080/13562510802334772.
  • Shore, C., and S. Wright. 1999. “Audit Culture and Anthropology: Neo-Liberalism in British Higher Education.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5(4):557–575. doi: 10.2307/2661148.
  • Spooren, P., B. Brock, and D. Mortelmans. 2013. “On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching: The State of the Art.” Review of Educational Research 83(4):598–642. doi: 10.3102/0034654313496870.
  • Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory and Techniques. London: Sage
  • Thomas, G., and D. James. 2006. “Reinventing Ground Theory: Some Questions about Theory, Ground and Discover.” British Educational Research Journal 32(6):767–795. doi: 10.1080/01411920600989412.
  • Tight, M. 2013. “Students: Customers, Clients or Pawns?.” Higher Education Policy 26(3):291–307. doi: 10.1057/hep.2013.2.
  • Winchester, T., and M. Winchester. 2011. “Exploring the Impact of Faculty Reflection on Weekly Student Evaluations of Teaching.” International Journal for Academic Development 16(2):119–131. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2011.568679.
  • Wright, S., and M. Jenkins-Guarnieri. 2012. “Student Evaluations of Teaching: Combining the Meta-Analyses and Demonstrating Further Evidence for Affective Use.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 37(6):683–699. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.563279.
  • Yorke, M. 2009. “Student Experience’ Surveys: Some Methodological Considerations and an Empirical Investigation.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 34(6):721–739. doi: 10.1080/02602930802474219.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.