Drivers for authenticity: student approaches and responses to an authentic assessment task

References

• Armstrong, D., A. Gosling, J. Weinman, and T. Marteau. 1997. “The Place of Inter-Rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: An Empirical Study.” Sociology 31 (3): 597–606. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038597031003015.
   Google Scholar
• Ashford-Rowe, K., J. Herrington, and C. Brown. 2014. “Establishing the Critical Elements That Determine Authentic Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (2): 205–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, K. 1989. “Audience Analysis and Persuasive Writing at the College Level.” Research in the Teaching of English 23 (3): 231–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2000. “Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for the Learning Society.” Studies in Continuing Education 22 (2): 151–167.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and N. Falchikov. 2006. “Aligning Assessment with Long-Term Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (4): 399–413. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., J. V. Price, and L. Steinman. 2013. “A Writing-Intensive Course Improves Biology Undergraduates' Perception and Confidence of Their Abilities to Read Scientific Literature and Communicate Science.” Advances in Physiology Education 37 (1): 70–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, K. 2011. “A Framework for Determining the Authenticity of Assessment Tasks: Applied to an Example in Law.” Journal of Learning Design 4 (2): 20–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v4i2.72.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 2013. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colthorpe, K., T. Sharifirad, L. Ainscough, S. T. Anderson, and K. Zimbardi. 2018. “Prompting Undergraduate Students’ Metacognition of Learning: Implementing ‘Meta-Learning’ Assessment Tasks in the Biomedical Sciences.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (2): 272–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, J., and A. Van Wyk. 2007. “Professional Socialisation: An Influence on Professional Development and Role Definition.” South African Journal of Higher Education 21 (7): 826–841.
   Google Scholar
• Cowin, L. S., M. Johnson, I. Wilson, and K. Borgese. 2013. “The Psychometric Properties of Five Professional Identity Measures in a Sample of Nursing Students.” Nurse Education Today 33 (6): 608–613. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, H., W. T. McGahan, and J. Harrison. 2015. “Questionable Benefit of Visual and Peer Mediated Learning on Overall Learning Outcomes of a First-Year Physiology Course.” International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL) 7 (1): 25–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. B., V. L. Schmitt, and J. P. Allen. 2012. “Defining Authentic Classroom Assessment.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 17 (1): 2.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, H., K. Colthorpe, H. Ernst, and L. Ainscough. 2020. “Professional Identity of Undergraduate Occupational Therapy Students.” Journal of Occupational Therapy Education 4 (1): 2.
   Google Scholar
• Gulikers, J., T. Bastiaens, and P. Kirschner. 2004. “A Five-Dimensional Framework for Authentic Assessment.” Educational Technology Research and Development 52 (3): 67–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02504676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., and A. Herrington. 1998. “Authentic Assessment and Multimedia: How University Students Respond to a Model of Authentic Assessment.” Higher Education Research & Development 17 (3): 305–322.
   Google Scholar
• Kohnen, A. M. 2013. “The Authenticity Spectrum: The Case of a Science Journalism Writing Project.” English Journal. 102 (5): 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2000. “Qualitative Content Analysis.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1 (2): ar20.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, N. M., and D. D. Nulty. 2009. “How to Use (Five) Curriculum Design Principles to Align Authentic Learning Environments, Assessment, Students’ Approaches to Thinking and Learning Outcomes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (5): 565–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope-Ruark, R.,. 2011. “Know Thy Audience: Helping Students Engage a Threshold Concept Using Audience-Based Pedagogy.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 5 (1), 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050106.
   Google Scholar
• Redd-Boyd, T. M., and W. H. Slater. 1989. “The Effects of Audience Specification on Undergraduates' Attitudes, Strategies, and Writing.” Research in the Teaching of English 77: 108.
   Google Scholar
• Rodger, S., M. Turpin, and M. O'Brien. 2015. “Experiences of Academic Staff in Using Threshold Concepts within a Reformed Curriculum.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (4): 545–560. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.830832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, A., A. Saroyan, and W. D. Dauphinee. 2011. “Evidence-Based Practice: A Review of Theoretical Assumptions and Effectiveness of Teaching and Assessment Interventions in Health Professions.” Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice 16 (2): 253–276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9251-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of North Dakota. 2018. "Fact Sheet Checklist." Center for Rural Health, University of North Dakota. Accessed December 10, 2018. https://ruralhealth.und.edu/communication/factsheets.
   Google Scholar
• Villarroel, V.,. S. Bloxham, D. Bruna, C. Bruna, and C. Herrera-Seda. 2018. “Authentic Assessment: Creating a Blueprint for Course Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (5): 840–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. 1990. “The Case for Authentic Assessment.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 2 (1): 2.
   Google Scholar