Antecedents of examinee motivation during low-stakes tests: examining the variability in effects across different research designs

References

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council for Measurement in Education 2014. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, C., and S. Finney. 2016. “Modeling Change in Effort across a Low-Stakes Testing Session: A Latent Growth Curve Modeling Approach.” Applied Measurement in Education 29 (1): 46–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2015.1102914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J., D. Bergin, and T. Whittaker. 2008. “Predicting Student Achievement for Low Stakes Tests with Effort and Task Value.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 33 (4): 609–624. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, D., and S. Maxwell. 2003. “Testing Mediational Models with Longitudinal Data: Questions and Tips in the Use of Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 112 (4): 558–577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, L., and M. Gierl. 2017. “The Impact of Immediate Test Score Reporting on University Students' Achievement Emotions in the Context of Computer-Based Multiple-Choice Exams.” Learning and Instruction 52: 27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, S., C. DiStefano, and J. Kopp. 2016. “Overview of Estimation Methods and Preconditions for Their Application with Structural Equation Modeling.” In Principles and Methods of Test Construction: Standards and Recent Advances, edited by K. Schweizer & C. DiStefano, 135–165. Boston, MA: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, S., C. Mathers, and A. Myers. 2016. “Investigating the Dimensionality of Examinee Motivation across Test Instruction Conditions in Low-Stakes Testing Contexts.” Research & Practice in Assessment 11: 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, S., A. Myers, and C. Mathers. 2018. “Test Instructions Do Not Moderate the Indirect Effect of Perceived Test Importance on Test Performance in Low-Stakes Testing Contexts.” International Journal of Testing 18 (4): 297–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1396466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, S., B. Perkins, and P. Satkus. 2020. “Examining the Simultaneous Change in Emotions during a Test: Relations with Expended Effort and Test Performance.” International Journal of Testing 20 (4): 274-298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, S., P. Satkus, and B. Perkins. 2020. “The Effect of Perceived Test Importance and Examinee Emotions on Expended Effort during a Low-Stakes Test: A Longitudinal Panel Model.” Educational Assessment 25 (2): 159–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, S., D. Sundre, M. Swain, and L. Williams. 2016. “The Validity of Value-Added Estimates from Low-Stakes Testing Contexts: The Impact of Change in Test-Taking Motivation and Test Consequences.” Educational Assessment 21 (1): 60–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flake, J., K. Barron, C. Hulleman, B. McCoach, and M. Welsh. 2015. “Measuring Cost: The Forgotten Component of Expectancy-Value Theory.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 41: 232–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, T., F. Preckel, R. Pekrun, and N. Hall. 2007. “Emotional Experiences during Test Taking: Does Cognitive Ability Make a Difference?” Learning and Individual Differences 17 (1): 3–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2006.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne, K., L. Bol, S. Pribesh, and Y. Suh. 2015. “Effects of Motivational Prompts on Motivation, Effort, and Performance on a Low-Stakes Standardized Test.” Research & Practice in Assessment 10: 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Jose, P. 2016. “The Merits of Using Longitudinal Mediation.” Educational Psychologist 51 (3-4): 331–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. 2011. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Knekta, E., and H. Eklöf. 2015. “Modeling the Test-Taking Motivation Construct through Investigation of Psychometric Properties of an Expectancy-Value-Based Questionnaire.” Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 33 (7): 662–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebert, R., and L. Morris. 1967. “Cognitive and Emotional Components of Test Anxiety: A Distinction and Some Initial Data.” Psychological Reports 20 (3): 975–978. doi:https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1967.20.3.975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, O. 2017. “Ten Years after the Spellings Commission: From Accountability to Internal Improvement.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 36 (2): 34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, O., J. Rios, and V. Borden. 2015. “The Effects of Motivational Instruction on College Students’ Performance on Low-Stakes Assessment.” Educational Assessment 20 (2): 79–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.1028618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H., K. Hau, and Z. Wen. 2004. “In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings.” Structural Equation Modeling; A Multidisciplinary Journal 11 (3): 320–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathers, C., S. Finney, and J. Hathcoat. 2018. “Student Learning in Higher Education: A Longitudinal Analysis and Faculty Discussion.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1211–1227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1443202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, A., and S. Finney. in press. “Does It Matter If Examinee Motivation is Measured before or after a Low-Stakes Test? a Moderated Mediation Analysis.” Educational Assessment.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neil, H., J. Abedi, J. Miyoshi, and A. Mastergeorge. 2005. “Monetary Incentives for Low-Stakes Tests.” Educational Assessment 10: 185–208.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R. 2017. “Achievement Emotions.” In Handbook of Competence and Motivation: Theory and Application, edited by A. Elliot, C. Dweck & D. Yeager, 251–271. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, Reinhard, Thomas Goetz, Raymond P. Perry, Klaudia Kramer, Michaela Hochstadt, and Stefan Molfenter. 2004. “Beyond Test Anxiety: Development and Validation of the Test Emotions Questionnaire (TEQ).” Anxiety, Stress and Coping 17 (3): 287–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800412331303847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penk, C., and D. Richter. 2017. “Change in Test-Taking Motivation and Its Relationship to Test Performance in Low-Stakes Assessments.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 29 (1): 55–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9248-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penk, C., and S. Schipolowski. 2015. “Is It All about Value? Bringing Back the Expectancy Component to the Assessment of Test-Taking Motivation.” Learning and Individual Differences 42: 27–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, B., P. Satkus, and S. Finney. in press. “Examining the Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of Test Emotions across Testing Platform, Gender, and Time.” Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P., D. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. McKeachie. 1991. A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. 2015. “Advances in Mediation Analysis: A Survey and Synthesis of New Developments.” Annual Review of Psychology 66 (1): 825–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putwain, D., R. Pekrun, L. Nicholson, W. Symes, S. Becker, and H. Marsh. 2018. “Control-Value Appraisals, Enjoyment, and Boredom in Mathematics: A Longitudinal Latent Interaction Analysis.” American Educational Research Journal 55 (6): 1339–1368. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218786689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, C., S. Bonaccio, and E. Winford. 2014. “Cognitive Ability, Exam-Related Emotions and Exam Performance: A Field Study in a College Setting.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 39 (2): 124–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silm, G., M. Pedaste, and K. Täht. (in press). The relationship between performance and test-taking effort when measured with self-report or time-based instruments: A Meta-analysis review. Educational Research Review.
   Google Scholar
• Sundre, D., and A. Thelk. 2010. “Advancing Assessment of Quantitative and Scientific Reasoning.” Numeracy 3 (2): 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.3.2.2.
   Google Scholar
• Thelk, A. D., D. L. Sundre, S. J. Horst, and S. J. Finney. 2009. “Motivation Matters: Using the Student Opinion Scale to Make Valid Inferences about Student Performance.” The Journal of General Education 58: 129–151.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, S., and C. DeMars. 2005. “Low Examinee Effort in Low-Stakes Assessment: Problems and Potential Solutions.” Educational Assessment 10 (1): 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1001_1.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, S., and L. Smith. 2011. “A Model of Examinee Test-Taking Effort.” In High-Stakes Testing in Education: Science and Practice in K–12 Settings, edited by J. Bovaird, K. Geisinger, & C. Buckendahl (Eds.), 139–153. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Zilberberg, A., S. Finney, K. Marsh, and R. Anderson. 2014. “The Role of Students’ Attitudes and Test-Taking Motivation on the Validity of College Institutional Accountability Tests: A Path Analytic Model.” International Journal of Testing 14 (4): 360–384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2014.928301.
   Google Scholar