The effects of gender and training on peer feedback characteristics

References

• Alqassab, M., J.-W. Strijbos, E. Panadero, J. F. Ruiz, M. Warrens, and J. To. 2023. “A Systematic Review of Peer Assessment Design Elements.” Educational Psychology Review 35 (1): 18. doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09723-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryadoust, V. 2016. “Gender and Academic Major Bias in Peer Assessment of Oral Presentations.” Language Assessment Quarterly 13 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1080/15434303.2015.1133626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, M., J.-W. Strijbos, and F. Fischer. 2022. “Impact of Sender and Peer-Feedback Characteristics on Performance, Cognitive Load, and Mindful Cognitive Processing.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 75: 101197. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Z., S. Yu, and J. Huang. 2019. “A Qualitative Inquiry into Undergraduates’ Learning from Giving and Receiving Peer Feedback in L2 Writing: Insights from a Case Study.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 63: 102–112. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, J. G., and G. L. Nelson. 1996. “Chinese Students’ Perceptions of ESL Peer Response Group Interaction.” Journal of Second Language Writing 5 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0.
   Google Scholar
• Caspi, A., E. Chajut, and K. Saporta. 2008. “Participation in Class and in Online Discussions: Gender Differences.” Computers & Education 50 (3): 718–724. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaplin, T. M. 2015. “Gender and Emotion Expression: A Developmental Contextual Perspective. Emotion.” Emotion Review: Journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion 7 (1): 14–21. doi:10.1177/1754073914544408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, K.-H., H.-T. Hou, and S.-Y. Wu. 2014. “Exploring Students’ Emotional Responses and Participation in an Online Peer Assessment Activity: A Case Study.” Interactive Learning Environments 22 (3): 271–287. doi:10.1080/10494820.2011.649766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K., C. D. Schunn, and D. Charney. 2006. “Commenting on Writing: Typology and Perceived Helpfulness of Comments from Novice Peer Reviewers and Subject Matter Experts.” Written Communication 23 (3): 260–294. doi:10.1177/0741088306289261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darvishi, A., H. Khosravi, A. Rahimi, S. Sadiq, and D. Gasevic. 2022. “Assessing the Quality of Student Generated Content at Scale: A Comparative Analysis of Peer Review Models.” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 16 (1): 106–120. doi:10.1109/TLT.2022.322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Double, K. S., J. A. McGrane, and T. N. Hopfenbeck. 2020. “The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Control Group Studies.” Educational Psychology Review 32 (2): 481–509. doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A. Buchner, and A.-G. Lang. 2009. “Statistical Power Analyses Using G*Power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses.” Behavior Research Methods 41 (4): 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielen, M., and B. De Wever. 2015a. “Structuring Peer Assessment: Comparing the Impact of the Degree of Structure on Peer Feedback Content.” Computers in Human Behavior 52: 315–325. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielen, M., and B. De Wever. 2015b. “Structuring the Peer Assessment Process: A Multilevel Approach for the Impact on Product Improvement and Peer Feedback Quality: Structuring the Peer Assessment Process.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 31 (5): 435–449. doi:10.1111/jcal.12096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C., and H. Leith. 2004. “Perpetuating Gender Stereotypes in the Classroom: A Teacher Perspective.” Educational Studies 30 (1): 3–17. doi:10.1080/0305569032000159705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamer, J., H. Purchase, A. Luxton-Reilly, and P. Denny. 2015. “A Comparison of Peer and Tutor Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (1): 151–164. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.893418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and M. Gan. 2010. “Instruction Based on Feedback.” In Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction, edited by P. Alexander and R. E. Mayer, 249–271. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival. Revised and expanded third edition. London: McGraw-Hill. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1009/2010010437-b.html
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, B., N. Saab, P. van den Broek, and J. van Driel. 2019. “The Impact of Formative Peer Feedback on Higher Education Students’ Academic Writing: A Meta-Analysis.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (6): 863–880. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, X., Q. Jiang, W. Xiong, Y. Feng, and W. Zhao. 2022. “Effects of Student Engagement in Peer Feedback on Writing Performance in Higher Education.” Interactive Learning Environments 0 (0): 1–16. doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2081209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. M., and D. H. Roen. 1992. “Complimenting and Involvement in Peer Reviews: Gender Variation.” Language in Society 21 (1): 27–57. doi:10.1017/S0047404500015025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kube, D., J. Weidlich, I. Jivet, K. Kreijns, and H. Drachsler. 2022. ““Gendered Differences versus Doing Gender”: A Systematic Review on the Role of Gender in CSCL.” Unterrichtswissenschaft 50 (4): 661–688. doi:10.1007/s42010-022-00153-y.
   Google Scholar
• Kulhavy, R. W., and W. A. Stock. 1989. “Feedback in Written Instruction: The Place of Response Certitude.” Educational Psychology Review 1 (4): 279–308. doi:10.1007/BF01320096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajom, J. A., N. Canoy, R. Amarnani, A. M. Parcon, and P. M. Valera. 2009. “Barkadahan: A Study of Peer Group Norms and Values among Filipino Adolescents.” Philippine Journal of Psychology 42 (2): 195–211.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, R. 2010. “A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback.” TESL Canada Journal 27 (2): 114–114. doi:10.18806/tesl.v27i2.1052.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., and G. G. Koch. 1977. “A One-Way Components of Variance Model for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33 (4): 671–679. doi:10.2307/2529465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, K., M. Chan, G. Maxwell, and T. Poon. 2010. “A Qualitative Analysis of Sub-Degree Students Commentary Styles and Patterns in the Context of Gender and Peer e-Feedback.” In Hybrid Learning, edited by P. Tsang, S. K. S. Cheung, V. S. K. Lee, and R. Huang, Vol. 6248, 149–159. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_15.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, N. F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290. doi:10.1080/13562510600680582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. P., and J. D. Smith. 1987. “Sex Differences in Learning Mathematics: A Longitudinal Study with Item and Error Analyses.” Journal of Educational Psychology 79 (4): 372–383. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narciss, S. 2008. “Feedback Strategies for Interactive Learning Tasks.” In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, edited by J. M. van Merriënboer, Spector, M. D. Merrill, & M. P. Driscoll, 3rd ed., 125–144. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9780203880869.ch11.
   Google Scholar
• Narciss, S., S. Sosnovsky, L. Schnaubert, E. Andrès, A. Eichelmann, G. Goguadze, and E. Melis. 2014. “Exploring Feedback and Student Characteristics Relevant for Personalizing Feedback Strategies.” Computers & Education 71: 56–76. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. M., and C. D. Schunn. 2009. “The Nature of Feedback: How Different Types of Peer Feedback Affect Writing Performance.” Instructional Science 37 (4): 375–401. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., S. K. Banihashem, N. Taghizadeh Kerman, M. Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M. Babayi, H. Ashrafi, and H. J. A. Biemans. 2022. “Gender Differences in Students’ Argumentative Essay Writing, Peer Review Performance and Uptake in Online Learning Environments.” Interactive Learning Environments. doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2034887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., J. Hatami, A. Bayat, S. van Ginkel, H. J. A. Biemans, and M. Mulder. 2018. “Students’ Online Argumentative Peer Feedback, Essay Writing, and Content Learning: Does Gender Matter?” Interactive Learning Environments 28 (6): 698–712. doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1543200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocampo, J. C., and E. Panadero. 2023. “Web-Based Peer Assessment Platforms: What Educational Features Influence Learning, Feedback and Social Interaction?” In The Power of Peer Learning, edited by O. Noroozi and B. De Wever. Cham: Springer Open. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_8.
   Google Scholar
• Ocampo, J. C., E. Panadero, and F. Díez. 2023. “Are Men and Women Really Different? The Effects of Gender and Training on Peer Scoring and Perceptions of Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (6): 760–776. doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2130167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E. 2016. “Is It Safe? Social, Interpersonal, and Human Effects of Peer Assessment: A Review and Future Directions.” In Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment, 247–266. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., M. Alqassab, J. F. Ruiz, and J. C. Ocampo. 2023. “A Systematic Review on Peer Assessment: Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Factors.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48(8): 1053–1075. doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2164884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., A. Jonsson, and M. Alqassab. 2018. “Providing Formative Peer Feedback: What Do We Know?” In The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback, edited by A. A. Lipnevich and J. K. Smith, 409–431. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316832134.020.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., A. Jonsson, and J.-W. Strijbos. 2016. “Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning through Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment: Guidelines for Classroom Implementation.” In Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation, edited by D. Laveault and L. Allal, Vol. 4, 311–326. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_18.
   Google Scholar
• Patchan, M. M., C. D. Schunn, and R. J. Clark. 2018. “Accountability in Peer Assessment: Examining the Effects of Reviewing Grades on Peer Ratings and Peer Feedback.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (12): 2263–2278. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1320374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patchan, M. M., C. D. Schunn, and R. J. Correnti. 2016. “The Nature of Feedback: How Peer Feedback Features Affect Students’ Implementation Rate and Quality of Revisions.” Journal of Educational Psychology 108 (8): 1098–1120. doi:10.1037/edu0000103.
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D., S. Brand-Gruwel, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, and R. L. Martens. 2004. “Training Teachers in Peer-Assessment Skills: Effects on Performance and Perceptions.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 41 (1): 59–78. doi:10.1080/1470329032000172720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J.-W., R. L. Martens, F. J. Prins, and W. M. G. Jochems. 2006. “Content Analysis: What Are They Talking about?” Computers & Education 46 (1): 29–48. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J.-W., S. Narciss, and K. Dünnebier. 2010. “Peer Feedback Content and Sender’s Competence Level in Academic Writing Revision Tasks: Are They Critical for Feedback Perceptions and Efficiency?” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 291–303. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. 1998. “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3): 249–276. doi:10.3102/00346543068003249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher, N. 2023. “Self-Regulating Writers’ Uses and Non-Uses of Peer Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 0 (0): 1–13. doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2179970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gennip, N. A. E., M. S. R. Segers, and H. H. Tillema. 2009. “Peer Assessment for Learning from a Social Perspective: The Influence of Interpersonal Variables and Structural Features.” Educational Research Review 4 (1): 41–54. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer, D., and S. D. Voyer. 2014. “Gender Differences in Scholastic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 140 (4): 1174–1204. doi:10.1037/a0036620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., and C. D. Schunn. 2020. “When Peers Agree, Do Students Listen? The Central Role of Feedback Quality and Feedback Frequency in Determining Uptake of Feedback.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 62: 101897. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., and C. D. Schunn. 2021. “From Plans to Actions: A Process Model for Why Feedback Features Influence Feedback Implementation.” Instructional Science 49 (3): 365–394. doi:10.1007/s11251-021-09546-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong, Z., C. D. Schunn, and Y. Wang. 2021. “Learning to Improve the Quality Peer Feedback through Experience with Peer Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (6): 973–992. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1833179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar