Discipline‐related Marking Behaviour Using Percentages: a potential cause of inequity in assessment

REFERENCES

• Becher , T. 1989 . Academic Tribes and Territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines , Buckingham : The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bigland . 1973 . The characteristics of a subject matter in different scientific areas . Journal of Applied Psychology , 57 : 195 – 203 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown , S. and Knight , P. 1994 . Assessing Learners in Higher Education , London : Kogan Page . Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Series
   Google Scholar
• Elton , L. 1998 . Are UK Degree Standards going up, down or sideways? . Studies in Higher Education , 23 : 35 – 42 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson , S. 1988 . Comparability in degree awards: implications of two decades of secondary‐level examination research . Studies in Higher Education , 13 : 177 – 187 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews , L. 1995 . Widening the range of marks . New Academic , : 7 – 8 . Autumn
   Google Scholar
• Powers , J. H. 1987 . Marks, classes and credits . Learning Resources Bulletin , 10 (1) : 13 – 25 . Middlesex Polytechnic
   Google Scholar
• Tognolini , J. and Andrich , D. 1995 . Differential subject performance and the problems of selection . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 20 : 161 – 173 .
   Google Scholar
• Yorke , M. , Cooper , A. , Fox , W. , Haines , C. , McHugh , P. , Turner , D. and Woolf , H. 1996 . “ Module mark distributions in eight subject areas and spmc issues they raise ” . In Modular Higher Education in the UK , London : HEQC .
   Google Scholar