Methodology of Transdisciplinarity

REFERENCES

• Apostel, L., B. Berger, A. Briggs, and G. Michaud. Eds. 1972. L’inter-disciplinarité—Problèmes d’enseignement et de recherche. Paris: Centre pour la Recherche et l’Innovation dans l’Enseignement, Organisation de Coopération et de développement économique.
   Google Scholar
• ATLAS Review “Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science.” 2013. Austin, TX: theATLAS Publishing. http://www.theatlas.org/index.php?option=com_phocadownload&view=section&id=4:transdisciplinary-journal-of-engineering-a-science&Itemid=76. Accessed December 16, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Badescu, H. and B. Nicolescu. Eds. 1999. Stéphane Lupasco—L’homme et l’œuvre. Monaco: Rocher.
   Google Scholar
• Camus, M., T. Magnin, B. Nicolescu, and K.-C. Voss. 1998. Levels of representation and levels of reality: Towards an ontology of science. In The concept of nature in science and theology (Part II), eds. N.H. Gregersen, M.W. S. Parsons, and C. Wassermann, 94–103. Genève: Labor et Fides. The Charter of Transdisciplinarity. . 1994. Paris: CIRET. . http://ciret-transdisciplinarity.org/index.php. Accessed July 12, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P. and B. Nicolescu. 2012. Complexity and transdisciplinarity discontinuity, levels of Reality and the Hidden Third. Futures 44(8):711–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIRET Review. 2013. Transdisciplinary encounters E-zine. Paris: CIRET. http://ciret-transdisciplinarity.org/bulletin/bulletin.php. Accessed July 12, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Descombes, V. 2004. Le complément du sujet. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich P.R. and A.H. Ehrlich. 2012. Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280:2012–2845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1968. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: The Seabury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galilei, G. 1992. Dialogue sur les deux grands systèmes du monde. Paris: Seuil. (Translated from the Italian by R. Fréreux with the collaboration of F. de Gandt.)
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. Eds. 1994. The new production of knowledge. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Huys, V. and V. Vernant. 2012. L’indisciplinaire de l’art. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. 1966. Méditations cartésiennes ( Translated from German by G. Peiffer and E. Levinas). Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Jantsch, E. 1972. Vers l’interdisciplinarité et la transdisciplinarité dans l’enseignement et l’innovation. In L’interdisciplinarité—Problèmes d’enseignement et de recherche, eds. G. Berger, A. Briggs, and G. Michaud, 97–121. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Lupasco, S. 1951. Le principe d’antagonisme et la logique de l’énergie—Prolégomènes à une science de la contradiction. Paris: Hermann & Cie.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, S.L. T. 2006. Transformative practice: New pathways to leadership. East Lansing, MI: Kappa Omicron Nu.
   Google Scholar
• Moraru, C. 2011. Cosmodernism—American narrative, late globalization, and the new cultural imaginary. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. 1977. La méthode I—La nature de la nature. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. 1980. La méthode II—La vie de la vie. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. 1986. La méthode III—La connaissance de la connaissance. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. 1991. La méthode IV—Les idées, leur habitat, leur vie, leurs mœurs, leur organisation. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. 2001. La méthode V—L’humanité de l’humanité. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. 2004. La méthode VI—Ethique. Paris, Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. 1985. Nous, la particule et le monde. Paris: Le Mail.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. 1996. La transdisciplinarité manifeste. Monaco: Rocher. (English translation: 2002, Manifesto of transdisciplinarity, New York: SUNY Press, translation from the French by K.-C. Voss).
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. 2000. Levels of reality as source of quantum indeterminancy. In Determinism and complexity, ed. F.T. Arecchi, 127–158. Rome, Italy: Nova Spes Foundation and Armando Publishing. http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0012007.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. 2004. Gurdjieff's philosophy of nature. In Gurdjieff, eds. J. Needleman and G. Baker, 37–69. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. 2005. Towards transdisciplinary education and learning. Paper presented at the Science and religion: Global perspectives Metanexus Institute conference. Philadelphia, PA. http://www.metanexus.net/archive/conference2005/pdf/nicolescu.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. 2006. Transdisciplinarity—Past, present and future. In Moving world-views—Reshaping sciences, policies and practices for endogenous sustainable development, eds. B. Haverkort and C. Reijntjes, 142–166. Amsterdam, Holland: COMPAS Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. Ed. 2008. Transdisciplinarity—Theory and practice. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. 2014. From modernity to cosmodernity—Science, culture, and spirituality. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. 2003. The potential of transdisciplinarity. In Rethinking interdisciplinarity (48–53). Paris, France: Interdisciplines Project. http://www.worldfishcenter.org/sites/default/files/The%20potential%20for%20transdisciplinarity.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce,C.S. 1976. The new elements of mathematics, Vol. IV., Ed.C. Eisele. The Hague: Mouton Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. 1972. L’épistémologie des relations interdisciplinaires. In L’interdisci-plinarité—Problèmes d’enseignement et de recherche, eds. G. Berger, A. Briggs, and G. Michaud, 127–139. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, C. 2011. From transdisciplinarity to transdisciplinary research. In Transdisciplinarity: Bridging natural science, social science, humanities & engineering, ed. A. Ertas, 90–101. Austin, TX: theATLAS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas Mitchell, W.J. 1995. Interdisciplinarity and visual culture. Art Bulletin 77 (4): 540–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson Klein, J. 1990. Interdisciplinarity—History, theory § practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson Klein, J., W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Häberli, A. Bill, R. Scholz, and M. Welti. Eds. 2001. Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society—An effective way for managing complexity. Basel, Seitzerland: Birkhäuser Verlag.
   Google Scholar