REFERENCES
- Agha, A. (2005). Voice, footing enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 38–59.
- Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
- Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
- Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society, 364, 1281–1289. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0319
- Barsalou, L.W. (2010). Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 716–724. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x
- Borghi, A. M. (2004). Object concepts and action: Extracting affordances from objects parts. Acta Psychologica, 115, 69–96. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.11.004
- Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. (2010). Embodied cognition and beyond: Acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia, 48, 763–773. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.029
- Fodor, J. A. (1985). Precis of “the modularity of mind.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(1), 1–5.
- Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3(4), 455–479. doi:10.1080/02643290442000310
- Gibbs, R. W., Lenz Costa Lima, P., & Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1189–1210. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.009
- Gibbs, R. W., & Pelosi Silva de Macedo, A. C. (2010). Metaphor and embodied cognition. D.E.L.T.A., 26, 679–700. doi:10.1590/S0102-44502010000300014
- Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2010). Grounding language in actionMetaphor and embodied cognition. Psychodynamic Bulletin & Review, 9(3) 558–565. doi:10.3758/BF03196313
- Goodwin, C. (2011). Contextures of action. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 182–193). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Lakoff, G. (2012). Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 773–785. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01222.x
- Searle, J. (1990). Is the brain's mind a computer program? Scientific American, 262(1), 26–31.
- Thompson, E. (2005). Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 407–427.
- Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition, 8(6), 769–800.
- Tulbert, E., & Goodwin, M. H. (2011). Choreographies of attention: Multimodality in a routine family activity. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 79–92). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Varela, F. J., & Poerksen, P. (2006). Truth is what works: Francisco J. Varela on cognitive science, Buddhism, the inseparability of subject and object, and the exaggerations of constructivism—A conversation. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 40(1), 35–53.