761
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Queer(ing) Moves: Beyond Anthropocene, Toward Convivial, Sustainable Futures

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2006a). Orientations: Toward a queer phenomenology. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 12(4), 543–574. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-2006-002
  • Ahmed, S. (2006b). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others? Duke University Press.
  • Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science. Environment and the material self. Indiana University Press.
  • Arias-Maldonado, M. (2015). Environment and society: Socionatural relations in the anthropocene. Springer.
  • Arizpe, L. (1998). Convivencia: The goal of conviviability, World Culture Report, 1998: Culture, Creativity and Markets. UNESCO.
  • Bankston, S. (2017). Deleuze and becoming. Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
  • Baskin, J. (2015). Paradigm dressed as epoch: The ideology of the anthropocene. Environmental Values, 24(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327115X14183182353746
  • Bauman, W. (2015). Climate weirding and queering nature: Getting beyond the anthropocene. Religions, 6(2), 742–754. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel6020742
  • Bell, D. (2010). Queernaturecultures. In C. Mortimer-Sandilands & B. Erickson (Eds.), Queer ecologies: Sex, nature, politics, desire (pp. 134–145). Indiana University Press.
  • Benson, M. H., & Craig, R. K. (2014). The end of sustainability. Society & Natural Resources, 27(7), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.901467
  • Berzonsky, C. L., & Moser, S. C. (2017). Becoming homo sapiens sapiens: Mapping the psycho-cultural transformation in the anthropocene. Anthropocene, 20, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2017.11.002
  • Blühdorn, I. (2017). Post-capitalism, post-growth, post-consumerism? Eco-political hopes beyond sustainability. Global Discourse, 7(2), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415
  • Boisvert, R. (2010). Convivialism: A philosophical manifesto. The Pluralist, 5(2), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1353/plu.2010.0001
  • Bonneuil, C., & Fressoz, J. (2016). The shock of the anthropocene. The earth, history and us. Verso.
  • Booth, R. (2018). Merleau-Ponty, correlationism, and alterity. PhaenEx, 12(2), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.22329/p.v12i2.5032
  • Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity Press.
  • Britzman, D. (1995). Is there a queer pedagogy? Or stop reading straight. Educational Theory, 45(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1995.00151.x
  • Brown, C., & Toadvine, T. (2003). Eco-phenomenology: Back to the earth itself. State University of New York Press.
  • Buchli, V. (2002). The material culture reader. Berg.
  • Burke, M. (2017). Love as a hollow: Merleau‐Ponty’s promise of queer love. Hypatia A Hypatia, 32(1), 54–68.
  • Caillé, A., Alphandéry, C., Ancel, G., Araujo, A. M., Attias-Donfut, C., Azam, G., & Viveret, P. (2014). Convivialist Manifesto. A declaration of interdependence. Käte Hamburger Kolleg & Centre for Global Cooperation Research.
  • Campbell, N., McHugh, G., & Ennis, P. (2019). Climate change is not a problem: Speculative realism at the end of organisation. Organization Studies, 40(5), 725–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618765553
  • Carpenter, E. (1984). The intermediate sex. In N. Greig (Ed.), Edward Carpenter selected writings Volume 1: Sex (pp. 185–244). GMP Publishers Ltd.
  • Case, S. (1997). Tracking the vampire. In K. Conboy & N. Medina (Eds.), Writing on the body: Female embodiment and feminist theory (pp. 380–400). Columbia University Press.
  • Cataldi, S., & Hamrick, W. (2007). Merleau-Ponty and environmental philosophy: Dwelling on the landscapes of thought. State University of New York Press.
  • Chambers, S. A. (2007). An incalculable effect. Political Studies, 55(3), 656–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00654.x
  • Colebrook, C. (2010). Queer vitalism. New Formations, 68(68), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.3898/newf.68.05.2009
  • Corber, R., & Valocchi, S. (2003). Introduction. In R. Corber & S. Valocchi (Eds.), Queer studies: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 1–17). Blackwell.
  • Deleuze, G. (1987). Dialogues (with Claire Parnet). Columbia University Press.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is Philosophy? Columbia University Press.
  • Demos, T. (2017). Against the Anthropocene. Sternberg Press.
  • Derrida, J. (2000). Hostipitality. Angelaki, 5(3), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09697250020034706
  • Doak, C. M. (2016). Queering nature: The liberatory effects of queer ecology [Honors Theses]. Dickinson College. Paper 246. https://scholar.dickinson.edu/student_honors/246
  • Edelman, L. (2004). No future: Queer theory and the death drive. Duke University Press.
  • Edelman, L. (2016). An ethics of desubjectivation? Differences, 27(3), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-3696679
  • Eggån, T. (2017). The ecological uncanny. Princeton University Press.
  • Fesmire, S. (2012). Ecological imagination in moral education, east and west. Contemporary Pragmatism, 9(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-90000223
  • Fisher, M. (2017). The weird and the eerie. Repeater Books.
  • Foster, J. (2015). After sustainability. Earthscan.
  • Foster, J. (2017). After sustainability: Denial, hope, retrieval. Environmental Values, 26(1), 117–119.
  • Francis, D. (2017). How to be otherwise. CARMaH museum otherwise symposium [Online]. http://www.carmah.berlin/reflections/auto-draft-12.
  • Gilroy, P. (2004). After empire: Melancholia or convivial culture? Routledge.
  • Glick, T. F. (1992). Convivencia: An introductory note. In V. Mann, T. Glick, & J. Dodds (Eds.), Convivencia: Jews, Muslims and Christians in medieval Spain (pp. 1–10). George Braziller.
  • Halberstam, J. J. (2011). The queer art of failure. Duke University Press.
  • Halberstam, J. J. (2015). Straight eye for the queer theorist—A review of ‘queer theory without antinormativity’. Bully Bloggers [online]. https://bullybloggers.wordpress.com/2015/09/12/straight-eye-for-the-queer-theorist-a-review-of-queer-theory-without-antinormativity-by-jack-halberstam/
  • Hall, D. (2003). Queer theories. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hamilton, C. (2013). Earthmasters: Playing god with the climate. Allen & Unwin.
  • Hamilton, C. (2017). Defiant earth: The fate of humans in the anthropocene. Polity Press.
  • Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press.
  • Hayward, E. (2008). More lessons from a starfish: Prefixial flesh and transspeciated selves. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 36(3–4), 64–85.
  • Heikkurinen, P., & Bonnedahl, K. J. (2019). Dead ends and liveable futures: A framework for sustainable change. In K. J. Bonnedahl & P. Heikkurinen (Eds.), Strongly sustainable societies: Organising human activities on a hot and full earth (pp. 289–301). Routledge.
  • Heikkurinen, P., Rinkinen, J., Jarvensivu, T., Wilen, K., & Ruuska, T. (2016). Organising in the Anthropocene. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.016
  • Heikkurinen, P., Ruuska, T., Kuokkanen, A., & Russell, S. (2019). Leaving productivism behind: Towards a holistic and processual philosophy of ecological management. Philosophy of Management [Online First Articles], 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-019-00109-w
  • Helne, T. (2019). Being matters: A holistic conception of wellbeing in the shift towards strongly sustainable societies. In K. J. Bonnedahl & P. Heikkurinen (Eds.), Strongly sustainable societies: Organising human activities on a hot and full earth (pp. 229–246). Routledge.
  • Hörl, E. (2017). Introduction into general ecology and ecologisation of thinking. In E. Hörl & J. Burton (Eds.), General ecology: The new ecological paradigm (pp. 1–13). Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Howe, C. (2014). Anthropocenic ecoauthority: The winds of Oaxaca. Anthropological Quarterly, 87(2), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2014.0029
  • Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. Marion Boyars.
  • Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge.
  • Ingold, T. (2015). The life of lines. Routledge.
  • Iovino, S., & Oppermann, S. (2014). Material ecocriticism. Indiana University Press.
  • Kagan, S. (2012). Toward global (environ)mental change: Transformative art and cultures of sustainability. Heinrich Böll Stiftung.
  • Kagan, S. (2013). Art and sustainability: Connecting patterns for a culture of complexity (2nd emended edition). Verlag.
  • Kagan, S. (2017). Artful sustainability: Queer-convivialist life-art and the artistic turn in sustainability research. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 8(1), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.22545/2017/00092
  • Kirksey, E. (2015). Species: A praxiographic study. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 21(4), 758–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12286
  • Kirksey, E. (2019). Queer love, gender bending bacteria, and life after the anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 197–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418769995
  • Kleinberg-Levin, D. (2008). Before the voice of reason. Echoes of responsibility in Merleau-Ponty’s ecology and Levinas’s ethics. State University of New York Press.
  • Korchagina, N. (2019). Organizing for an ecologically sustainable world: Reclaiming nature as wonder through Merleau-Ponty. Epherema, 18(4), 805–815.
  • Kosofsky Sedgwick, E. (1993). Tendencies. Duke University Press.
  • Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. Columbia University Press.
  • Küpers, W. (2013). Embodied inter-practices of leadership. Leadership, 9(3), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715013485852
  • Küpers, W. (2014). Embodied Inter-Be(com)ing – The contribution of Merleau-Ponty’s relational Ontology for a processual understanding of chiasmic organising. In J. Helin, T. Hernes, D. Hjorth, & R. Holt (Eds), Oxford handbook of process philosophy and organization studies (pp. 413–431). Oxford University Press.
  • Küpers, W. (2015a). Embodied responsive ethical practice: The Merleau-Ponty for a corporeal ethics in organisations. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 20(1), 30–45.
  • Küpers, W. (2015b). De-+-Touring through ‘inter-place’. In S. Sonnenburg & D. Wee (Eds.), Touring consumption, series management-culture-interpretation (pp. 133–160). Springer.
  • Küpers, W. (2015c). Phenomenology of the embodied organization. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Küpers, W. (2016). Embodied, relational practices of human and non-human in a material, social, and cultural nexus of organizations. On_Culture: The Open Journal for the Study of Culture, 2(2). http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2016/12352/pdf/On_Culture_2_Kuepers.pdf.
  • Küpers, W. (2017). The embodied Inter-Be(com)ing of Spirituality. The in-between as spiritual sphere in practically wise organizations. In S. Nandram (Ed.), Managing VUCA by an integrative self-managed way: Enhancing integrating simplification theory (pp. 229–247). Springer.
  • Küpers, W. (2019). Post-pandoran hope for moving wisely beyond the neo-promethean anthropocene. In D. Ericsson & M. Kostera (Eds), Organizing goodness and hope (pp. 72–84). Edward Elgar.
  • Küpers, W. (2020). From the Anthropocene to an ‘Ecocene’ – eco-phenomenological perspectives on embodied, anthro-decentric transformations towards enlivening practices of organising sustainably. Sustainability, 12, 3633.
  • Küpers, W., Sonnenberg, S., & Martin, Z. (2017). Introduction: ReThinking management?! In W. Küpers, S. Sonnenburg, & M. Zierold (Eds.), Re-thinking management (pp. 11–30). Springer.
  • Latour, B. (2013). Facing Gaia: A new enquiry into natural religion. The Gifford lectures. University of Edinburgh. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/486. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/downloads/GIFFORD-ASSEMBLED.pdf.
  • Laurier, E., & Philo, C. (2006). Cold shoulders and napkins handed: Gestures of responsibility. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00205.x
  • Malm, A. (2013). The origins of fossil capital: From water to steam in the British cotton industry. Historical Materialism, 21(1), 15–68. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341279
  • Malm, A. (2016). Fossil capital: The rise of steam power and the roots of global warming. Verso.
  • Margulis, L., & Sagan, D. (1995). What is life? Simon and Schuster.
  • McEwan, I. (2019). Machines like me: A novel. Cape.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1995). The visible and the invisible. Northwestern University Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003). Nature course notes from the college de. Northwestern University Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.
  • Moore, J. (2016). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. PM Press.
  • Mortimer-Sandilands, C., & Erickson, B. (2010). Queer ecologies: sex, nature, politics, desire. Indiana University Press.
  • Morton, T. (2010a). The ecological thought. Harvard University Press.
  • Morton, T. (2010b). Queer ecology. PMLA, 125(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2010.125.2.273
  • Morton, T. (2016). Dark ecology: For a logic of future coexistence. Columbia University Press.
  • Muñoz, J. E. (2009). Cruising Utopia. New York University Press.
  • Nowicka, M. (2019). Fantasy of conviviality: Banalities of multicultural settings and what we do (not) notice when we look at them. In O. Hemer, M. Povrzanović Frykman, & P.M. Ristilammi (Eds.), Conviviality at the crossroads (pp. 15–42). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nowicka, M., & Vertovec, S. (2014). Introduction: Comparing convivialities: Dreams and realities of living-with-difference. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(4), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413510414
  • Overing, J., & Passes, A. (Eds.). (2000). The anthropology of love and anger: The aesthetics of conviviality in native Amazonia. Routledge.
  • Parikka, J. (2015). The Anthrobscene. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Parkins, W. (2018). Edward Carpenter’s queer ecology of the everyday. 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century, 26. https://doi.org/10.16995/ntn.803
  • Rölli, M. (2017). Deleuze as a theorist of power. Coils of the Serpent, 1, 19–29.
  • Ruffolo, D. V. (2009). Post-queer politics. Ashgate.
  • Saldanha, A., & Stark, H. (2016). A new earth: Deleuze and Guattari in the anthropocene. Deleuze Studies, 10(4), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.3366/dls.2016.0237
  • Sandilands, C. (2019). A very queer citizen: Jane rule’s public lives. The University of British Columbia Press.
  • Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed theory out of bound. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Sardo, C. (2019). Remain faithful to the earth: Resentment, responsibility and political theory in the anthropocene [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Northwestern University.
  • Schimelpfenig, R. (2017). The drama of the anthropocene: Can deep ecology, romanticism, and renaissance science rebalance nature and culture? American Journal of Economics & Sociology, 76(4), 821–1081.
  • Serres, M. (1995). The natural contract. University of Michigan Press.
  • Serres, M. (2007). The parasite. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Serres, M. (2011). Malfeasance: Appropriation through pollution? Stanford University Press.
  • Serres, M. (2012). Biogea. Univocal.
  • Serres, M. (2014). Times of crisis. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Slaughter, R. (2004). Futures beyond dystopia: Creating social foresight. Routledge.
  • Sperling, A. (2019). The weird and the queer. Collateral – Online Journal for Cross-Cultural Close Reading, Cluster, 16(d). http://collateral-journal.com/index.php?cluster=16.
  • Swimme, B., & Berry, T. (1992). The universe story: From the primordial flaring forth to the ecozoic era; a celebration of the unfolding of the cosmos. Harper Collins.
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2014). Anthropocenic politicization. From the politics of the environment to politicizing environments. In K. Bradley & J. Hedrén (Eds.), Green utopianism. Perspectives, politics and micro-practices (pp. 23–37). Routledge.
  • Swyngedouw, E., & Ernsts, H. (2018). Interrupting the anthropo-obscene: Immuno-biopolitics and depoliticising ontologies in the anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(6), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418757314
  • Toadvine, T. (2014). Apocalyptic imagination and the silence of the elements. In D. A. Vakoch & F. Castrillón (Eds.), Ecopsychology, phenomenology, and the environment: The experience of nature (pp. 211–221). Springer.
  • Totten, M. P. (2018). Flourishing sustainably in the anthropocene? Known possibilities and unknown probabilities. In Reference module in earth systems and environmental sciences (pp. 1–79). Elsevier.
  • Turpin, E. (Ed.), (2013). Matters of cosmopolitics: On the provocations of Gaïa — Isabelle Stengers in conversation with Heather Davis and Etienne Turpin. In E. Turpin (Ed.), Matters of cosmopolitics, in architecture in the anthropocene: Encounters among design, deep time, science and philosophy (pp. 171–182). Open Humanities Press.
  • Walker, B. (2019). Precarious time: Queer anthropocene futures. Parrhesia, 30, 137–155.
  • Weber, A. (2019). Enlivenment: Toward a poetics for the anthropocene. MIT Press.
  • Whitworth, L. (2019). Goodbye Gauley mountain, hello eco-camp: Queer environmentalism in the Anthropocene. Feminist Theory, 20(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700118788684
  • Wiegman, R., & Wilson, E. A. (2015). Introduction: Antinormativity’s queer conventions. Differences, 26(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2880582
  • Williston, B. (2015). The anthropocene project. Oxford University Press.
  • Wise, A., & Noble, G. (2016). Convivialities: An orientation. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37(5), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2016.1213786

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.