Publication Cover
World Futures
The Journal of New Paradigm Research
Volume 79, 2023 - Issue 7-8
606
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Task-Based Language Teaching Approach for Improving Speaking Fluency: Case Study of Trainee Teachers in West Bengal

References

  • Abdi, M., Eslami, H., & Zahedi, Y. (2012). The impact of pre-task planning on the fluency and accuracy of Iranian EFL learners’ oral performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 2281–2288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.199
  • Ahmadian, M. (2012). The effects of guided careful online planning on complexity, accuracy and fluency in intermediate EFL learners’ oral production: The case of English articles. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811425433
  • Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). Exploring the utility of action research to investigate second‐language classrooms as complex systems. Educational Action Research, 19(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2011.569160
  • Alanazi, S. M. (2016). The impact of pre-task planning on the oral production of Saudi EFL learners. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 21(2), 69–73.
  • Albino, G. (2017). Improving speaking fluency in a task-based language teaching approach: The case of EFL learners at PUNIV-Cazenga. SAGE Open, 7(2), 215824401769107. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017691077
  • Ates, B., Eslami, Z., & Wright, K. L. (2015). Incorporating World Englishes into undergraduate ESL education courses. World Englishes, 34(3), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12149
  • Babu, Y. V. (2017). An overview on CLL, TBLT approaches to enhance communication skills for engineering students: The activity labs. International Journal of Management and Applied Science, 3(4), 29–32.
  • Banu, S. R., & Nishanti, R. (2017). Difficulties faced by college student in speaking English-A sociological reflection. International Journal of Trend in Research and Development, 4(3), 435–436.
  • Bui, G., & Huang, Z. (2018). L2 fluency as influenced by content familiarity and planning: Performance, measurement, and pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816656650
  • Campo, A. C. (2016). Improving 10th graders’ English communicative competence through the implementation of the task-based learning approach. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 18(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n2.48272.
  • Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K. (2015). Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12185
  • De Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s speaking model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24.
  • De Jong, N., & Vercellotti, M. L. (2016). Similar prompts may not be similar in the performance they elicit: Examining fluency, complexity, accuracy, and lexis in narratives from five picture prompts. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815606161
  • De Jong, N., Steinel, M., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). Facets of speaking proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000489
  • Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
  • Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford University Press.
  • Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(02), 3, 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060141
  • Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x
  • Ellis, R. (2017). Position Paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward. Language Teaching, 50(4), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000179
  • Evans, S. (2012). Designing email tasks for the Business English classroom: Implications from a study of Hong Kong’s key industries. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.03.001
  • Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015047
  • Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354
  • Foster, P., & Tavakoli, P. (2009). Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency, and lexical diversity. Language Learning, 59(4), 866–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00528.x
  • Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, 175199, 40.
  • Geng, X., & Ferguson, G. (2013). Strategic planning in task-based language teaching: The effects of participatory structure and task type. System, 41(4), 982–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.09.005
  • Hadi, A. (2013). Perceptions of task-based language teaching: A study of Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 103–111.
  • Harmer, J. (2001). Practice of English language teaching. Longman.
  • Hishan, S. S. (2020). Enhancing speaking fluency and accuracy in a task-based language teaching approach with corrective feedback. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(7), 658–669.
  • Huang, D. (2015). A study on the application of task-based language teaching method in a comprehensive English class in China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 118–127.https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0701.13
  • Kasap, B. (2005). The effectiveness of task-based instruction in the improvement of learners’ speaking skills [Doctoral dissertation]. Bilkent University.
  • Kirkgoz, Y. (2011). A blended learning study on implementing video recorded speaking tasks in task-based classroom instruction. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(4), 1–13.
  • Koizumi, R. (2005). Relationships between productive vocabulary knowledge and speaking performance of Japanese learners of English at the novice level. University of Tsukuba.
  • Kormos, J. (2014). Differences across modalities of performance. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning–insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 193–216). John Benjamins.
  • Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Addison-Wesley Longman Limited.
  • Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816683559
  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
  • Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126
  • Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of research on language acquisition (Vol. 2, pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
  • Long, M. H. (2006). Problems in SLA. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2017). Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA): An overview. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 1–12). Taylor & Francis.
  • Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(03), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104263021
  • Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (2013). Counterpoint piece: The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 1–18.
  • Markee, N., & Kunitz, S. (2013). Doing planning and task performance in second language acquisition: An ethnomethodological respecification. Language Learning, 63(4), 629–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12019
  • Marlina, R. (2017). The prospect of teaching English as an international language in a Chinese context: Student-teachers’ reactions. In Researching Chinese English: The state of the art (pp. 173–188). Springer.
  • Masuram, J., & Sripada, P. N. (2020). Developing spoken fluency through task-based teaching. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.080
  • Matsuda, A. (Ed.). (2017). Preparing teachers to teach English as an international language. Multilingual Matters.
  • MunirahMuhsin, M. A. (2015). Using task-based approach in improving the students’ speaking accuracy and fluency. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(3), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v4n3a19
  • Newsom-Ray, A. C., & Rutter, S. J. (2016). Task-based learning and language proficiency in a business university. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, (13), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.314
  • Nilsson, E. (2012). A comparison of the effects of accuracy vs fluency based tasks on student motivation, self-confidence, accuracy and fluency. Halmstad University, School of Humanities (HUM).
  • Nunan, D. (1988). Principles for designing language teaching materials. Guidelines: A Periodical for Classroom Language Teachers, 10(2), 1–24.
  • Nunan, D. (Ed.) (1992). Collaborative language learning and teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  • Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(1), 109–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199001047
  • Pérez, N. P. (2016). Effects of tasks on spoken interaction and motivation in English language learners. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, 13(13), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.311
  • Pierson, S. J. (2015). Bridges to Swaziland: Using task-based learning and computer-mediated instruction to improve English language teaching and learning. Teaching English with Technology, 15(2), 105–119.
  • Révész, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(3), 437–470. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090366
  • Revesz, A. J. (2007). Focus on form in task-based language teaching: Recasts, task complexity, and L2 learning [Doctoral dissertation]. Columbia University.
  • Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (pp. 204). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305.021
  • Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Galloway, N. (2021). Global Englishes and language teaching: A review of pedagogical research. Language Teaching, 54(2), 157–189. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000518)
  • Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000502
  • Salimi, A. (2015). The effect of focus on form and task complexity on L2 learners’ oral task performance. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(6), 54–62.
  • Samaranayake, S. W. (2016). Oral competency of ESL/EFL learners in Sri Lankan rural school context. SAGE Open, 6(2), 215824401665420. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016654202
  • Sanchez, A. (2004). The task-based approach in language teaching. International Journal of English Studies, 4(1), 39–71.
  • Sarıçoban, A., & Karakurt, L. (2016). The use of task-based activities to improve listening and speaking skills in EFL context. Sino-US English Teaching, 13(6), 445–459.
  • Segalowitz, N. (2010). The cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge.
  • Segalowitz, N. (2013). Fluency. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopaedia of second language acquisition (pp. 240–244). Routledge.
  • Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.38
  • Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.
  • Skehan, P. (2003). Task based instruction. Language Teaching, 36(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480200188X
  • Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy,fluency, lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–523. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
  • Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011967
  • Sullivan, T. P. (2010). The evolution of law enforcement attitudes to recording custodial interviews. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 38(1–2), 137–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/009318531003800107
  • Suntharesan, V. (2014). Task based language teaching to promote communicative competence. Language in India, 14(8), 174–187.
  • Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125–144). Oxford University Press.
  • Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Lawernce EelbaumAssociates.
  • Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition. Newbury House.
  • Tavakoli, P., Campbell, C., & McCormack, J. (2016). Development of speech fluency over a short period of time: Effects of pedagogic intervention. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 447–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.244
  • Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Eds.), Planning and task performance (pp. 239–273). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58/(2), 439–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00446.x
  • Tulung, G. J. (2008). Communicative task-generated oral discourse in a second language: A case study of peer interaction and non-native teacher talk in an EFL classroom [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Ottawa.
  • Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning (1st ed.). Longman.
  • Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45–55.
  • Yildiz, Y. (2020). Task-Based language teaching: An approach in the spotlight to propel language learning forward. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 7(1), 72–77.
  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 283–290.
  • Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and online planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.1

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.