The Politics of Transdisciplinarity

References

• Albert, R., & Barabasi, A. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (New York, NY), 286(5439), 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509
   Google Scholar
• Albert, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1), 47–97. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, G. (2015). Retrieving the lost worlds of the past: The case for an ontological turn. The American Historical Review, 120(3), 787–810. https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/120.3.787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, G. (2018). The realness of things past: Ancient Greece and ontological history. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barabasi, A. (2003). Linked: The new science of networks. Perseus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R. (2004). Developments in pluralist and elite approaches. In E. Amenta, K. Nash, & A. Nash (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to political sociology (pp. 17–28). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bernini, M., & Woods, A. (2014). Interdisciplinarity as cognitive integration: auditory verbal hallucinations as a case study. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 5(5), 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development and current issues. Journal of Research Practice, 11(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P. (2002). Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P., & Nicolescu, B. (2012). Complexity and transdisciplinarity–Discontinuity, levels of reality and the hidden third. Futures, 44(8), 711–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers, S., Du Toit, M., Cilliers, J., Drewes, E., & Retief, F. (2014). Sustainable urban landscapes: South African perspectives on transdisciplinary possibilities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drimie, S., & McLachlan, M. (2013). Food security in South Africa—first steps toward a transdisciplinary approach. Food Security, 5(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-013-0241-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dybå, T., Torgeir, D., & Nils Brede, M. (2014). Agile project management. In G. Ruhe & C. Wohlin (Ed.), Software project management in a changing world (pp. 277–300). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Emmel, N. (2021). Post-disciplinary realism. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1803526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farine, D. R. (2018). When to choose dynamic vs. static social network analysis. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 87(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, A. (2017). Survivor research and Mad Studies: the role and value of experiential knowledge in mental health research. Disability & Society, 32(4), 500–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1302320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, D. J., & Fernandez, J. D. (2008). Agile project management—agilism versus traditional approaches. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(2), 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, A., & Kelso, S. (2017). Coordination dynamics and synergetics: From finger movements to brain patterns and ballet dancing. In S. C. Muller, P. A. Plath, G. Radons, & A. Fuchs (Eds.), Complexity and synergetics (pp. 301–316). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Galston, W. (2009). The idea of political pluralism. Nomos, 49, 95–124.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M. (1999). Science’s new social contract with society. Nature, 402(6761 Suppl), C81–C84. https://doi.org/10.1038/35011576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M. (2000). Mode 2 society and the emergence of context-sensitive science. Science and Public Policy, 27(3), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154300781782011
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gudowsky, N., Bechtold, U., Peissl, W., & Sotoudeh, M. (2021). Democratising utopian thought in participatory agenda setting. European Journal of Futures Research, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-021-00174-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, A. (2018). Review and suggested resolution of the problem of Schrodinger’s cat. Contemporary Physics, 59(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2017.1401368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., Hurlbut, J. B., & Saha, K. (2015). CRISPR democracy: Gene editing and the need for inclusive deliberation. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(1), 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., Hurlbut, J. B., & Saha, K. (2019). Democratic governance of human germline genome editing. The CRISPR Journal, 2(5), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2019.0047
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, N. (2009). Simply complexity: A clear guide to complexity theory. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, S. (2009). Coordination dynamics (pp. 1537–1565). Retrieved December 15, 2022 from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Scott-Kelso/publication/301949127_Coordination_Dynamics/links/572f8af108ae744151904ab8/Coordination-Dynamics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. (2004). Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 515–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, C., Reid, R., Fernández-Giménez, M., Klein, J., & Galvin, K. (2019). Placing transdisciplinarity in context: A review of approaches to connect scholars, society and action. Sustainability, 11(18), 4899. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeFrançois, B. A., Menzies, R., & Reaume, G. (2013). Mad matters: A critical reader in Canadian mad studies. Canadian Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, S. (2011). Quantum coherence in biological systems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 302(1), 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/302/1/012037
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, Y., Kasamatsu, H., & Sakakibara, M. (2022). Challenges in forming transdisciplinary communities of practice for solving environmental problems in developing countries. World Futures, 78(8), 546–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2021.2012878
   Google Scholar
• Max-Neef, M. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittelstrass, J. (2011). On transdisciplinarity. Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 15(4), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2011.4.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, E. (1991). The anti-totalitarian revolution. Thesis Eleven, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/072551369103000102
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. (1992). From the concept of system to the paradigm of complexity. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 15(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/1061-7361(92)90024-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, E. (1993). For a crisiology 1. Industrial & Environmental Crisis Quarterly, 7(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/108602669300700102
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. (1995). Our common home. UNESCO Courier-English Edition, 48(11), 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. (1999). The agents of double globalization. World Futures, 53(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.1999.9972736
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. (2001). Seven complex lessons in education for the future. UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. (2007). Restricted complexity, general complexity. In C. Gershenshon, D. Aerts, & B. Edmonds (Eds.), Worldviews, science and us: Philosophy and complexity (pp. 5–29). World Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812707420_0002
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. (2008). On complexity (Translated by Robin Poster). Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. (2014). Complex thinking for a complex world- about reductionism, disjunction and systemism. Systema: connecting Matter, Life, Culture and Technology, 2(1), 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. (2018). From homeland Earth; A new manifesto for the new millennium. Journal of Conscious Evolution, 1(1).
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E., & Coppay, F. (1983). Beyond determinism: The dialogue of order and disorder. SubStance, 12(3), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/3684252
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167–256. https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. (2006). Transdisciplinarity: past, present and future in Congresso Mundial de (pp. 1–24). Retrieved December 14, 2022, from https://www.tercercongresomundialtransdisciplinariedad.mx/en/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Transdisciplinarity-past-present-and-future.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. (2012). Transdisciplinarity: the hidden third, between the subject and the object. Human and Social Studies, 1, 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. (2014). Methodology of transdisciplinarity. World Futures, 70(3–4), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2014.934631
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. (2015a). Transdisciplinary methodology of the dialogue between people, cultures, and spiritualities. Human and Social Studies, 4(2), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/hssr-2015-0011
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. (2015b). The hidden third and the multiple splendor of being. In V. Bazhanov & R. W. Scholz (Eds.), Transdisciplinarity in philosophy and science: approaches, problems, prospects (pp. 62–79). Navigator Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41(3), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025505528250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipere, A., & Lorenzi, F. (2021). The dialogical potential of transdisciplinary research: Challenges and benefits. World Futures, 77(8), 559–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2021.1875673
   Google Scholar
• Russo, J. (2012). Survivor-controlled research: A new foundation for thinking about psychiatry and mental health. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1).
   Google Scholar
• Strogatz, S. (2001). Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410(6825), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/35065725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tognoli, E., Mengsen, Z., & Kelso, J. (2018). On the nature of coordination in nature. In J. Delgado-Garcia, X. Pan, R. Sánchez-Capusano, & R. Wang (Ed.), Advances in cognitive neurodynamics (VI) (pp. 375–382). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vallacher, R. R., Nowak, A., & Zochowski, M. (2005). Dynamics of social coordination: The synchronization of internal states in close relationships. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 6(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.6.1.04val
   Google Scholar
• Woods, A., Jones, N., Bernini, M., Callard, F., Alderson-Day, B., Badcock, J. C., Bell, V., Cook, C. C. H., Csordas, T., Humpston, C., Krueger, J., Larøi, F., McCarthy-Jones, S., Moseley, P., Powell, H., Raballo, A., Smailes, D., & Fernyhough, C. (2014). Interdisciplinary approaches to the phenomenology of auditory verbal hallucinations. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(Suppl 4), S246–S254. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbu003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1991). Knowledges in context. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(1), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399101600108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1992). Public understanding of science research: new horizons or hall of mirrors? Public Understanding of Science, 1(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/1/1/008
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1994). May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In B. Szerszynski & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology (pp. 44–83). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Yagisawa, T. (1988). Beyond possible worlds. Philosophical Studies, 53(2), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., Kelso, J. S., & Tognoli, E. (2018). Critical diversity: divided or united states of social coordination. PLoS One, 13(4), e0193843. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar