Patterns in how pre-service elementary teachers formulate evidence-based claims about student cognition

References

• Athanases, S. Z., L. H. Bennett, and J. M. Wahleithner. 2013. “Fostering Data Literacy through Preservice Teacher Inquiry in English Language Arts.” The Teacher Educator 48 (1): 8–28. doi:10.1080/08878730.2012.740151.
   Google Scholar
• Athanases, S. Z., L. H. Bennett, and J. M. Wahleithner. 2015. “Adaptive Teaching for English Language Arts: Following the Pathway of Classroom Data in Preservice Teacher Inquiry.” Journal of Literacy Research 47 (1): 83–114. doi:10.1177/1086296X15590915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnhart, T., and E. van Es. 2015. “Studying Teacher Noticing: Examining the Relationship among Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Ability to Attend, Analyze and Respond to Student Thinking.” Teaching and Teacher Education 45: 83–93. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., T. Richter, and J. F. Rouet. 2014. “Scientific Literacy: The Role of Goal-Directed Reading and Evaluation in Understanding Scientific Information.” Educational Psychologist 49 (2): 104–122. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.916217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chick, H., and R. Pierce. 2013. “The Statistical Literacy Needed to Interpret School Assessment Data.” Mathematics Teacher Education and Development 25 (2): 189–205.
   Google Scholar
• Cosner, S. 2011. “Teacher Learning, Instructional Considerations and Principal Communication: Lessons from a Longitudinal Study of Collaborative Data Use by Teachers.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 39 (5): 568–589. doi:10.1177/1741143211408453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowie, B., and B. Cooper. 2016. “Exploring the Challenge of Developing Student Teacher Data Literacy.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 24 (2): 147–163. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2016.1225668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., V. Park, and B. Kennedy-Lewis. 2013. “Affordances and Constraints in the Context of Teacher Collaboration for the Purpose of Data Use.” Journal of Educational Administration 51 (3): 341–362. doi:10.1108/09578231311311500.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. E., D. T. Airola, W. Lo, and M. Garrison. 2013. “Becoming Data Driven: The Influence of Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy on Concerns Related to Data-Driven Decision Making.” Journal of Experimental Education 81 (2): 222–241. doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.699899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facione, P. A. 1990. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fives, H., N. Barnes, C. Dacey, and A. Gillis. 2016. “Assessing Assessment Texts: Where Is Planning?” The Teacher Educator 51 (1): 70–89. doi:10.1080/08878730.2015.1107442.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., and H. Braun. 2013. Data-Driven Improvement and Accountability. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Haria, P. D., and E. Midgette. 2014. “A Genre-Specific Reading Comprehension Strategy to Enhance Struggling Fifth-Grade Readers’ Ability to Critically Analyze Argumentative Text.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 30 (4): 297–327. doi:10.1080/10573569.2013.818908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. 1969. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogland, I., K. Schildkamp, F. van der Kleij, M. Heitink, W. Kippers, B. Veldkamp, and A. M. Dijkstra. 2016. “Prerequisites for Data-Based Decision Making in the Classroom: Research Evidence and Practical Illustrations.” Teaching and Teacher Education 60: 377–386. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 1980. Content Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, M. K., and S. McNaughton. 2016. “The Impact of Data Use Professional Development on Student Achievement.” Teaching and Teacher Education 60: 434–443. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, M., M. A. Britt, and A. A. Larson. 2004. “Disfluencies in Comprehending Argumentative Texts.” Reading Psychology 25 (3): 205–224. doi:10.1080/02702710490489908.
   Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B., J. M. Friedman, and E. S. Gummer. 2015. “How Can Schools of Education Help to Build Educators’ Capacity to Use Data: A Systemic View of the Issue.” Teachers College Record 117 (4): 1–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B., and E. S. Gummer. 2016a. Data Literacy for Educators: Making It Count in Teacher Preparation and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B., and E. S. Gummer. 2016b. “What Does It Mean for Teachers to Be Data Literate: Laying Out the Skills, Knowledge, and Dispositions.” Teaching & Teacher Education 60: 366–376. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B., and J. B. Jimerson. 2016. “Teachers Learning How to Use Data: A Synthesis of the Issues and What Is Known.” Teaching and Teacher Education 60: 452–457. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A. 2012. “Interventions Promoting Educators’ Use of Data: Research Insights and Gaps.” Teachers College Record 114 (11): 1–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., and C. C. Farrell. 2015. “How Leaders Can Support Teachers with Data-Driven Decision Making: A Framework for Understanding Capacity Building.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 43 (2): 269–289. doi:10.1177/1741143214537229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., and J. S. Krajcik. 2011. Supporting Grade 5–8 Students in Constructing Explanations in Science: The Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning Framework for Talk and Writing. New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., E. Chen, A. DeBarger, and C. Padilla. 2011. Teachers’ Ability to Use Data to Inform Instruction: Challenges and Supports. Washington, DC: U.S.A.: Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., L. Gallagher, and C. Padilla (2007). “Teachers’ Use of Student Data Systems to Improve Instruction.” Accessed 15 August 2017. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501547.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. K. 2006. “Assessing Pre-Service Teachers’ Skills for Analyzing Teaching.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 9 (5): 471–505. doi:10.1007/s10857-006-9015-7.
   Google Scholar
• Oberman, M. E., and K. P. Boudett. 2015. “Eight Steps to Becoming Data Wise.” Educational Leadership 73 (3).
   Google Scholar
• Oláh, L., N. R. Lawrence, and M. Riggan. 2010. “Learning to Learn from Benchmark Assessment Data: How Teachers Analyze Results.” Peabody Journal of Education 85 (2): 226–245. doi:10.1080/01619561003688688.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, R., and H. Chick. 2013. “Workplace Statistical Literacy for Teachers: Interpreting Box Plots.” Mathematics Education Research Journal 25 (2): 189–205. doi:10.1007/s13394-012-0046-3.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, R., H. Chick, and I. Gordon. 2013. “Teachers’ Perceptions of the Factors Influencing Their Engagement with Statistical Reports on Student Achievement Data.” Australian Journal of Education 57 (3): 237–255. doi:10.1177/0004944113496176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, R., H. Chick, J. Watson, M. Les, and M. Dalton. 2014. “A Statistical Literacy Hierarchy for Interpreting Educational System Data.” Australian Journal of Education 58 (2): 195–217. doi:10.1177/0004944114530067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piro, J. S., K. Dunlap, and T. Shutt. 2014. “A Collaborative Data Chat: Teaching Summative Assessment Data Use in Pre-Service Teacher Education.” Cogent Education, 1 1. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2014.968409.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. D. 2017. “Equipping Pre-Service Elementary Teachers for Data Use in the Classroom.” Action in Teacher Education 39 (4): 361–380. doi:10.1080/01626620.2017.1336131.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. D., and J. L. Chiang. 2017. “Building Pre-Service Teacher Capacity to Use External Assessment Data: An Intervention Study.” The Teacher Educator 52 (2): 155–172. doi:10.1080/08878730.2016.1273420.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. D., and S. L. Honig. 2015. “A Classroom Assessment Data Literacy Intervention for Pre- Service Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 50: 90–101. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., L. Karbautzki, and J. Vanhoof. 2014. “Exploring Data Use Practices around Europe: Identifying Enablers and Barriers.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 42: 15–24. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer, S. M., C. M. Phelps, J. E. Beyers, D. Y. Johnson, and E. M. Sieminski. 2011. “Developing Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Abilities to Identify Evidence of Student Mathematical Achievement.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 14 (1): 67–87. doi:10.1007/s10857-010-9141-0.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J., R. Przybylski, and B. J. Johnson. 2016. “A Review of Research on Teachers’ Use of Student Data: From the Perspective of School Leadership.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 28 (1): 5–33. doi:10.1007/s11092-016-9238-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gelder, T. 2005. “Teaching Critical Thinking: Some Lessons from Cognitive Science.” College Teaching 53: 41–46. doi:10.3200/CTCH.53.1.41-48.
   Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C., and J. B. Jimerson. 2014. “Teacher Needs for Data-Related Professional Learning.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 42: 25–34. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. 1990. Basic Content Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, C., and R. Santagata. 2015. “Preservice Teachers’ Learning to Generate Evidence-Based Hypotheses about the Impact of Mathematics Teaching on Learning.” Journal of Teacher Education 66 (1): 21–34. doi:10.1177/0022487114549470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, V. M. 2006. “Teachers’ Use of Data: Loose Coupling, Agenda Setting, and Team Norms.” American Journal of Education 112 (4): 521–548. doi:10.1086/505058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar