The social life of divorced parents. Do custody arrangements make a difference in divorced parents’ social participation and contacts?

References

• Allen, D. W., & Brinig, M. (2011). Do joint parenting laws make any difference? Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8, 304–324.10.1111/jels.2011.8.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amato, P. R., Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., & Rogers, S. J. (2007). Alone together: How marriage in America is changing. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch, G. K., Biener, L., & Barnett, R. C. (1987). Women and gender in research on work and family stress. American Psychologist, 42, 130–136.10.1037/0003-066X.42.2.130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastaits, K., Ponnet, K., & Mortelmans, D. (2012). Parenting of divorced fathers and the association with children’s self-esteem. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 1643–1656.10.1007/s10964-012-9783-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauserman, R. (2002). Child adjustment in joint-custody versus sole-custody arrangements: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 91–102.10.1037/0893-3200.16.1.91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauserman, R. (2012). A meta-analysis of parental satisfaction, adjustment, and conflict in joint custody and sole custody following divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 53, 464–488.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, M. E., & Arnold, J. E. (2009). Gendered time use at home: An ethnographic examination of leisure time in middle-class families. Leisure Studies, 28, 121–142.10.1080/02614360902773888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 843–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, C. M., Maccoby, E. E., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1992). Adolescents and their families after divorce: Three residential arrangements compared. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2, 261–291.
   Google Scholar
• Coser, L., & Coser, R. (1974). Greedy institutions: Patterns of undivided commitment. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denissen, J. A., Geenen, R., Van Aken, M. A. G., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). Development and validation of a Dutch translation of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 152–157.10.1080/00223890701845229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggebeen, D. J., & Knoester, C. (2001). Does fatherhood matter for men? Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 381–393.10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabricius, W. V., Sokol, K. R., Diaz, P., & Braver, S. L. (2012). Parenting time, parent conflict, parent-child relationships, and children’s physical health. In K. Kuehnle & L. Drozd (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court (pp. 188–213). Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fehlberg, B., Smyth, B., Maclean, M., & Roberts, C. (2011). Legislating for shared time parenting after separation: A research review. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 25, 318–337.10.1093/lawfam/ebr015
   Google Scholar
• Flom, P. L., Mcmahon, J. M., & Pouget, E. R. (2006). Using PROC NLMIXED and PROC GLMMIX to analyze dyadic data with binary outcomes. Paper presented on the annual meeting of the Northeast SAS Users’ Group, Philadelphia, September, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstel, N. (1988). Divorce, gender, and social integration. Gender and Society, 2, 343–367.10.1177/089124388002003007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H., & Hensher, D. A. (2010). Modeling ordered choices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511845062
   Google Scholar
• Gunnoe, M. L., & Braver, S. L. (2001). The effects of joint legal custody on mothers, fathers, and children, controlling for factors that predispose a sole maternal versus joint legal award. Law & Human Behavior, 25, 25–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Jappens, M., & Van Bavel, J. (2012). Contact tussen kleinkinderen en grootouders na echtscheiding [Contacts between grandchildren and grandparents following divorce]. Relaties en Nieuwe Gezinnen, 2(6), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Jappens, M., Wijckmans, B., & Van Bavel, J. (2011). Echtscheiding en kinderopvang [Divorce and child care]. In D. Mortelmans, I. Pasteels, P. Bracke, K. Matthijs, J. Van Bavel, & C. Van Peer (Eds.), Scheiding in Vlaanderen [Divorce in Flanders] (pp. 325–335). Leuven: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Juby, H., Le Bourdais, C., & Marcil-Gratton, N. (2005). Sharing roles, sharing custody? Couples’ and children’s living characteristics at separation arrangements. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 157–172.10.1111/jomf.2005.67.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M. (2003). Shared friendship networks and the life course: An analysis of survey data on married and cohabiting couples. Social Networks, 25, 231–249.10.1016/S0378-8733(03)00010-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M. (2012). Longitudinal analyses of the effects of age, marriage, and parenthood on social contacts and support. Advances in Life Course Research, 17, 177–190.10.1016/j.alcr.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M., & Broese Van Groenou, M. I. (2005). Differential effects of divorce on social integration. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 455–476.10.1177/0265407505054516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiernan, K. E., Tao, J., & Gibbs, P. (2012). Tips and strategies for mixed modeling with SAS/STAT procedures. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, C. (2010). Different things make different people happy: Examining social capital and subjective well-being by gender and parental status. Social Indicators Research, 104, 157–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, I. (2007). Procesrechterlijke innovaties inzake verblijfs- en omgangsregeling [Procedural law innovations regarding custody and contact regulations]. In P. Senaeve, F. Swennen, & G. Verschelden (Eds.), Verblijfsco-ouderschap. Uitvoering en sanctionering van verblijfs- en omgangsregelingen. Adoptie door personen van hetzelfde geslacht [Physical joint custody. Execution and sanctioning of custody and contact regulations. Adoption by same-sex persons] (pp. 125–146). Antwerpen – Oxford: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Milardo, R. M. (1987). Changes in social networks of women and men following divorce: A review. Journal of Family Issues, 8, 78–96.10.1177/019251387008001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, G. (1990). Structural determinants of men’s and women’s personal networks. American Sociological Review, 55, 726–735.10.2307/2095868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortelmans, D., Pasteels, I., Van Bavel, J., Bracke, P., Matthijs, K., & Van Peer, C. (2011). Divorce in Flanders. Data collection and code book. Retrieved from www.divorceinflanders.be
   Google Scholar
• Ottosen, M. H. (2006). In the name of the father, the child and the holy genes constructions of ‘the child’s best interest’ in legal disputes over contact. Acta Sociologica, 49, 29–46.10.1177/0001699306061898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C. E. (1995). Reconceptualizing marital status as a continuum of social attachment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 129–140.10.2307/353822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotolo, T. (2000). A time to join, a time to quit: The influence of life cycle transitions on voluntary association membership. Social Forces, 78, 1133–1161.10.1093/sf/78.3.1133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, P., Grotenhuis, M., & Gelissen, J. (2002). Welfare states and dimensions of social capital: Cross-national comparisons of social contacts in European countries. European Societies, 4, 185–207.10.1080/14616690220142781
   Google Scholar
• Seippel, O. (2006). Sport and social capital. Acta Sociologica, 49, 169–183.10.1177/0001699306064771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2007). Marital status and social well-being: Are the married always better off? Social Indicators Research, 88, 329–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, S. M. (2001). The family leisure dilemma: Insights from research with Canadian families the family leisure dilemma. World Leisure Journal, 43, 53–62.10.1080/04419057.2001.9674249
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, B., Weston, R., Moloney, L., Richardson, N., & Temple, J. (2008). Changes in patterns of post-separation parenting over time: Recent Australian data. Journal of Family Studies, 14, 23–36.10.5172/jfs.327.14.1.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodermans, A. K., Matthijs, K., & Swicegood, G. (2013). Characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders. Demographic Research, 28, 821–848.10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodermans, A. K., Vanassche, S., Matthijs, K., & Swicegood, G. (2014). Measuring postdivorce living arrangements: Theoretical and empirical validation of the Residential Calendar. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 125–145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhell, E. L., Broese van Groenou, M. I., & van Tilburg, T. (2004). Network dynamics in the long-term period after divorce. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 719–738.10.1177/0265407504047833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfs, N. (2011). Verblijfsco-ouderschap en onderhoudsgeld in het licht van de wet van 19 maart 2010. Enkele bedenkingen vanuit genderperspectief. Proeve van clausule [Joint physical custody and alimony from perspective of the law of 19th of March 2010. Some considerations from gender perspective]. Tijdschrift voor Notarissen, 2011, 334–354.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ingen, E. (2008). Social participation revisited. Disentangling and explaining period, life-cycle and cohort effects. Acta Sociologica, 51, 103–121.10.1177/0001699308090038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanbockrijk, H. (2009). Twee jaar toepassing van de wet van 18 juli 2006 inzake het verblijfsco-ouderschap en de uitvoering en sanctionering van verblijfs- en omgangsregelingen [Two years of adapting the July 18th, 2006 law regarding physical joint custody and the execution and sanctioning of custody and contact regulations]. In P. Senaeve, F. Swennen, & G. Verschelden (Eds.), Knelpunten echtscheiding, afstamming en verblijfsregelingen [Pressure points of divorce, descent and custody arrangements]. (pp. 191–211). Antwerpen – Oxford: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar