What’s in it for the cats?: cat shows as serious leisure from a multispecies perspective

References

• Arluke, A., & Sanders, C. (1996). Regarding animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, T. (2018). Practical feline behaviour: Understanding cat behaviour and improving welfare. Wallingford: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. K., & Norris, P. A. (1999). Exploring the dimensions of serious leisure: ‘Love Me – Love My Dog!’. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beardsworth, A., & Bryman, A. (2001). The wild animal in late modernity. Tourist Studies, 1(1), 83–104.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. (1996). Metaphoric relationships with pets. Society and Animals, 4(2), 121–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Lanham: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birke, L. (2009). Naming Names – Or, What’s in it for the Animals? Humanimalia, 1(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. W. S. (2017). The animals among us: The new science of anthrozoology. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. W. S., Casey, R. A., & Brown, S. L. (2012). The behaviour of the domestic cat. 2nd edn. Wallingford: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. (2016). From working to winning: The shifting symbolic value of connemara ponies in the west of Ireland. In D. L. Davis & A. Maurstad (Eds.), The meaning of horses: Biosocial encounters (pp. 69-84). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, H., & Gourkow, N. (2016). Impact of stress and distress on cat behaviour and body language. In S. Ellis & A. Sparkes (Eds.), Feline stress and health: Managing negative emotions to improve feline health and wellbeing (pp. 31-39). Tisbury: International Cat Care.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, N. (2014). Dogs in the leisure experience. Wallingford: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, N. (ed). (2015). Domestic animals and leisure. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, B., & Charles, N. (2013). Animals, agency and resistance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 43(3), 322–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, N., & Davies, C. A. (2008). My family and other animals: Pets as kin. Sociological Research Online, 13(5), 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dashper, K. (2017). Human-animal relationships in equestrian sport and leisure. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. (2009). Pedigree and breeding: Love, status and control. In T. T. Holmberg (Ed.), Investigating human/animal relations in science, culture and work (pp. 97-113). Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, A. (1999). Animals & modern cultures: A sociology of human-animal relations in modernity. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gallant, K., Arai, S., & Smale, B. (2013). Celebrating, challenging and re-envisioning serious leisure. Leisure/Loisir, 37(2), 91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (2005). Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight. Daedalus, 134(4), 56–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, D. L., Leffler, A., & Lerner, E. (2002). If it Weren‘t for my Hobby, I’d have a life: Dog sports, serious leisure, and boundary negotiations. Leisure Studies, 21(3–4), 285–304.
   Google Scholar
• Gourkow, N. (2016). Prevention and management of stress and distress for cats in homing centres. In S. Ellis & A. Sparkes (Eds.), Feline stress and health: Managing negative emotions to improve feline health and wellbeing (pp. 89-102). Tisbury: International Cat Care.
   Google Scholar
• Grasseni, C. (2005). Designer cows: The practice of cattle breeding between skill and standardisation. Society & Animals, 13(1), 33–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, B. C. (2001). Leveraging subculture and identity to promote sport events. Sport Management Review, 4(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gruen, L. (2015). Entangled empathy: An alternative ethic for our relationships with animals. New York: Lantern Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2008a). Training in the contact zone: Power, play, and invention in the sport of agility. In B. Da Costa & K. Philip (Eds.), Tactical biopolitics: Art, activism, and technoscience (pp. 445-464). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2008b). When species meet. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, E. C. (1994). Consumers and their animal companions. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 616–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, C., Bocarro, J. N., Henderson, K. A., Zabriskie, R., Parcel, T. L., & Kanters, M. A. (2015). Family leisure: An integrative review of research from select journals. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(5), 577–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultsman, W. (2015). Dogs and companion/performance sport: Unique social worlds, serious leisure enthusiasts, and solid human-canine partnerships. In N. Carr (Ed.), Domestic animals and leisure (pp. 35-66). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hultsman, W. Z. (2012). Couple involvement in serious leisure: examining participation in dog agility. Leisure Studies, 31(2), 231–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurn, S. (2008). What’s love got to do with it? The interplay of sex and gender in the commercial breeding of welsh cobs. Society and Animals, 16(1), 23–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurn, S. (2018). Encounters with dogs as an exercise in analysing multi-species ethnography. In J. Lewis (Ed.), SAGE research methods dataset. London: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781526440921
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, L., & Cilia, L. (2017). More-than-human families: Pets, people, and practices in multispecies households. Sociology Compass, 11(2), e12455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kry, K., & Casey, R. (2007). The effect of hiding enrichment on stress levels and behaviour of domestic cats (Felis sylvestris catus) in a shelter setting and the implications for adoption potential. Animal Welfare, 16(3), 375–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., Kennelly, M., & Moyle, B. (2014). Costs and perseverance in serious leisure careers. Leisure Sciences, 36(2), 144–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T. (2018). A feminist posthumanist multispecies ethnography for educational studies. Educational Studies, 54(3), 253–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMartin, C., Coe, J. B., & Adams, C. L. (2014). Treating distressed animals as participants: I know responses in veterinarians’ pet-directed talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(2), 151–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milstein, T. (2009). ‘Somethin’ Tells Me It’s All Happening at the Zoo’: Discourse, power, and conservationism. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 3(1), 25–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton, K. (2005). Anthropomorphism or Egomorphism? The perception of non human persons by human ones. In J. Knight (Ed.), Animals in person: Cultural perspectives on human-animal intimacies (pp. 255-271). Berg: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, A. (2012). Difficult moments in the ethnographic interview: Vulnerability, silence and rapport. In J. Skinner. (Ed.), The interview: An ethnographic approach (pp. 143-159). ASA Monographs 49. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Peñaloza, L. (2001). Consuming the American West: Animating cultural meaning and memory at a stock show and rodeo. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 369–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojek, C. (2001). Preface. In R. Stebbins (Ed.), New directions in the theory and research of serious leisure (pp. i-iv). Lewiston, NY: Edward Mellen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, C. (1999). Understanding Dogs: Living and working with canine companions. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, C. (2003). Actions speak louder than words: Close relationships between humans and Nonhuman Animals. Symbolic Interaction, 26(3), 405–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scammon, D. L. (1987). Breeding, training, and riding: The serious side of horsing around. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 125-128.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbins, R. A. (1982). Serious leisure: A conceptual statement. The Pacific Sociological Review, 25(2), 251–272.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbins, R. A. (2015). Serious leisure: A perspective for our time. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sundahl, E., Rodan, I., & Heath, S. (2016). Providing feline-friendly consultations. In I. Rodan & S. Heath (Eds.), Feline behavioural health and welfare (pp. 269-286). St Louis, MO: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Syrjälä, H. (2016). Turning point of transformation: Consumer communities, identity projects and becoming a serious Dog Hobbyist. Journal of Business Research, 69(1), 177–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevorrow, N. (2013). Helping cats cope with stress in veterinary practice. Veterinary Nursing Journal, 28(10), 327–329.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (1990). The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and travel in contemporary societies. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Vinke, C. M., Godijn, L. M., & van der Leij, W. J. R. (2014). Will a hiding box provide stress reduction for shelter cats? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 160, 86–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Uexküll, J. (2010). A foray into the worlds of animals and humans. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warkentin, T. (2009). Whale Agency: Affordances and acts of resistance in captive environments. In S. E. McFarland & R. Hediger (Eds.), Animals and agency: An interdisciplinary exploration (pp. 23-43). Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Warkentin, T. (2010). Interspecies Etiquette: An ethics of paying attention to animals. Ethics and the Environment, 15(1), 101–121.
   Google Scholar