An exploratory study of British Millennials’ attitudes to the use of live animals in events

References

• Adams, C. (2010). The war on compassion. Antennae, 14, 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, M. J. (1997). Aristotle for everybody: Difficult thought made easy. New York: Touchstone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J., O’Toole, W., Harris, R., & McDonnell, I. (2011). Festival & special event management (5th ed.). Milton: John Wiley & Sons Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Apostol, L., Rebega, O. L., & Miclea, M. (2012). Psychological and socio-demographic predictors of attitudes toward animals. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 521–525.
   Google Scholar
• Auger, P., & Devinney, T. M. (2007). Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 361-383. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9287-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. (2007). Doing focus groups. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. (2007). Ex-race horses should be slaughtered for meat. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/somerset/content/articles/2007/12/04/horseworld_feature.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Bekoff, M. (2013). Animal consciousness and science matter: Anthropomorphism is not anti-science. Relations beyond Anthropocentrism, 1(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bowdin, G., Allen, J., O’Toole, W., Harris, R., & McDonnell, I. (2011). Event management (3rd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• British Horse Racing Authority. (2017). About us. British Horse Racing Authority. Retrieved from http://www.britishhorseracing.com/bha/about-us/
   Google Scholar
• Broida, J. P., Tingley, L., Kimball, R., & Miele, J. (1993). Personality differences between pro and antivivisectionists. Society and Animals, 1, 129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Apostolova, V., Barton, C., Bolton, P., Dempsey, N., Harai, D., … Powell, A. (2017). Millennials. Retrieved from www.parliament.uk/commons-library
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2014). The grand national: 8 things they don’t tell you about horse racing. PETA UK. Retrieved from http://www.peta.org.uk/blog/the-grand-national-8-things-they-dont-tell-you-about-horse-racing/
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, A. (2009). Do animals have an interest in liberty? Political Studies, 57, 660–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, S. (2006). Swimming with dolphins: A phenomenological exploration of tourist recollections. International Journal of Tourism Research, 8, 301–315.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, B., & Morton, L. (2009). Empathic differences in adults as a function of childhood and adult pet ownership and pet type. Anthrozoös, 22(4), 371–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dashper, K. (2016). Human-Animal relationships in equestrian sport and leisure. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Waal, F. B. M. (2001). The ape and the Sushi master: Cultural reflections of a primatologist. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennell, D. A. (2012). Tourism and animal ethics. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, D. A. (2017). Tourism Ethics. Bristol: Channel View Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, D. R. (1980). Taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, D., Gouthro, M. B., Morakabati, Y., & Brackstone, J. (2014). Doing events research: From theory to practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, S., & Herzog, H. (1992). Ethical ideology, animal rights activism, and attitudes toward the treatment of animals. Ethics & Behaviour, 2(3), 141–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garner, R. (1993). Animals, politics and morality. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gautam, C. K., & Rajan, A. P. (2014). Ecocentrism in India: An incredible model of peaceful relation with nature. Universal Journal of Environmental Research & Technology, 4(2), 90–99.
   Google Scholar
• Getz, D. (2005). Event management and event tourism (2nd ed.). New York: Cognizant Communications Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Getz, D. (2012). Event studies; Theory, research and policy for planned events. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. M. (1997). Hallmark tourist events: Impacts, management and planning. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, R. (2008). Animal welfare: Competing conceptions and their ethical implications. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J., Mobly, M., & McKim, B. (2016). Reaching millennials: Implications for advertisers of competitive sporting events that use animals. Journal of Applied Communications, 100(2), 73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M., & Nelkin, D. (1992). The animal rights crusade: The growth of a moral protest. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.
   Google Scholar
• Jaynes, M. (2008). The ethical disconnect of the circus: Humanity’s acceptance of performing elephants. Between the Species, 8, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (2014). Sustainable event management: A practical guide. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, A. (2012). A new history of Western philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, S., & Barnett, L. (2008). Justifying attitudes toward animal use: A qualitative study of people’s views and beliefs. Anthrozoös, 21(1), 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus Groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Leventi-Perez, O. (2011). Disney’s portrayal of nonhuman animals in animated films between 2000 and 2010 (Master’s thesis). Scholar Works@ Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Liutikas, D. (2016). Indulgence feasts: Manifestation of religious and communal identity. In A. Jepson & A. Clarke (Eds.), Managing and developing communities, festivals & events (pp. 148–149). Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Machan, T. R. (2002). Why human beings may use animals. Journal of Value Inquiry, 36(1), 9–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, R. (2016). Number of vegans in Britain soars in past decade, here’s why. The Huffington Post UK. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/number-of-vegans-in-uk-half-million_uk_573c2557e4b0328a838b92a3
   Google Scholar
• NHS. (2015). Healthy eating for vegetarians and vegans. Retrieved from: http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/Vegetarianhealth/Pages/Goingvegetarian.aspx
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, P. (2002). Central problems in philosophy: Relativism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, D. J. (2003). The evolutionary roots of our environmental problems: Toward a Darwinian ecology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 78(3), 275–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlis, M. (2016). Forbes survey reveals what millennials really want. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeperlis/2016/06/06/forbes-survey-reveals-what-millennials-really-want/#60d186a36755
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Centre. (2010). Millennials: A portrait of generation next. Confident. Connected. Open to change. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2010/10/millennials-confident-connected-open-to-change.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pifer, L., Shimizu, K., & Pifer, R. (1994). Public attitudes towards animal research: Some international comparisons. Society and Animals, 2(2), 95–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollin, B. E. (2016). A new basis for animal ethics: Telos and common sense. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, C. (2013). Can you worry about an animal you’ve never seen? The role of the zoo in education and conservation. Sci-Ed. Retrieved from http://blogs.plos.org/scied/2013/03/11/zoo-education/
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, R. D. (1970). Speciesism. Retrieved from http://www.criticalsocietyjournal.org.uk/Archives_files/1.SpeciesismAgain.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, R. D. (2000). Animal revolution: Changing attitudes towards speciesism. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, R. D., & Singer, P. (2011). Speciesism, painism and happiness: A morality for the twenty-first century. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, B. (2017). The happiness philosophers: The lives and works of the great utilitarians. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serpell, J. (1996). In the company of animals: A study of human-animal relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, P. (2006). Moral agency in other animals. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 27(4), 357–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shone, A., & Parry, B. (2010). Successful event management: A practical handbook. Andover: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (1990). Animal liberation (2nd ed.). London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (2011). Practical ethics (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smythe, K. (2014). Rethinking humanity and the Anthropocene: The long view of humans & nature. Sustainability: the Journal of Record, 7(3), 145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Spracklen, K., & Lamond, I. R. (2016). Critical event studies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, G. (2005). Anthropocentrism and its discontents: The moral status of animals in the history of Western philosophy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stringer, M. D. (1999). Rethinking animism: Thoughts from the infancy of our discipline. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5(4), 541–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugarman, R. (2007). The many worlds of circus. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• The Vegan Society. (2017). Key facts. Retrieved from https://www.vegansociety.com/about-us/key-facts
   Google Scholar
• The Vegan Society. (2018). Key facts. The Vegan Society. Retrieved from https://www.vegansociety.com/about-us/key-facts
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, F., & Fox, D. (2014). Modelling attitudes to nature, tourism and sustainable development in national parks: A survey of visitors in China and the UK. Tourism Management, 45, 142–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar