Multispecies leisure: human-animal interactions in leisure landscapes

References

• Baldwin, C. K., & Norris, P. A. (1999). Exploring the dimensions of serious leisure: “Love me—Love my dog!”. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2008). Queer causation and the ethics of mattering. In N. Giffney & M. J. Hird (Eds.), Queering the non-human. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bertella, G. (2014). The co-creation of animal-based tourism experience. Tourism Recreation Research, 39(1), 115–125.
   Google Scholar
• Birke, L. (2007). Relating animals: Feminism and our connections with nonhumans. Humanity & Society, 31(4), 305–318.
   Google Scholar
• Birke, L., & Hockenhull, J. (2012). Investigating human-animal bonds: Realities, relating, research. In L. Birke & J. Hockenhull (Eds.), p. 15-36. Crossing boundaries. Investigating human-animal relationships. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Bowes, M., Keller, P., Rollins, R., & Gifford, R. (2015). Parks, dogs, and beaches: Human- wildlife conflict and the politics of place. In N. Carr (Ed.), p. 146-174. Domestic animals and leisure: Leisure studies in a global era. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Buchmann, A. (2017). Insights into domestic horse tourism: The case study of Lake Macquarie, NSW, Australia. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(3), 261–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, H. (2014). Animal geographies I. Progress in Human Geography, 38(2), 308–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, N. (2014). Dogs in the leisure experience. London: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, N., & Broom, D. M. (2018). Tourism and animal welfare. London: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, B, & Charles, N. (2013). Animals, agency and resistance. Journal for The Theory Of Social Behaviour, 43(3), 322-340. doi:10.1111/jtsb.2013.43.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catlin, J., Hughes, M., Jones, T., Jones, R., & Campbell, R. (2013). Valuing individual animals through tourism: Science or speculation? Biological Conservation, 157, 93–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, C. (2012). Animal assisted therapy in counseling. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, N. (2014). ‘Animals just love you as you are’: Experiencing kinship across the species barrier. Sociology, 48(4), 715–730.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, N., & Davies, C. A. (2011). My family and other animals: Pets as kin. Sociological Research Online, 13(5), 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, C., & Knights, D. (2018). Who’s a good boy then? Anthropocentric masculinities in veterinary practice. Gender, Work & Organization. doi:10.1111/gwao.12244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, S. (2011). Duties to companion animals. Res Publica, 17(3), 261.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, K. (2016). Beyond human to humane: A multispecies analysis of care work, its repression, and its potential. Studies in Social Justice, 10(2), 199–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, S., & Kragh, G. (2014). Wildlife tourism: Reconnecting people with nature. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19(6), 545–554.
   Google Scholar
• Danby, P. (2018). Post-humanistic insight into human-equine interactions and wellbeing within leisure and tourism. In J. Young & N. Carr (Eds.), Domestic animals, humans, and leisure (pp. 58–176). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dashper, K. (2012). Together, yet still not equal? Sex integration in equestrian sport. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 3(3), 213–225.
   Google Scholar
• Dashper, K. (2014). Tools of the trade or part of the family? Horses in competitive equestrian sport. Society & Animals, 22(4), 352–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dashper, K. (2016). Strong, active women: (Re)doing rural femininity through equestrian sport and leisure. Ethnography, 17(3), 350–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dashper, K. (2017a). Listening to horses: Developing attentive interspecies relationships through sport and leisure. Society & Animals, 25(3), 207–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dashper, K. (2017b). Human-animal relationships in equestrian sport and leisure. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dashper, K. (2018). Moving beyond anthropocentrism in leisure research: Multispecies perspectives. Annals of Leisure Research, 22(2), 133–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dashper, K. (2019). More-than-human emotions: Multispecies emotional labour in the tourism industry. Gender, Work & Organization. doi:10.1111/gwao.12344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dashper, K., Abbott, J., & Wallace, C. (2019). ‘Do horses cause divorces?’ Autoethnographic insights on family, relationships and resource intensive leisure. Annals of Leisure Research, 1–18. doi:10.1080/11745398.2019.1616573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dashper, K., & Brymer, E. (2019). An ecological-phenomenological perspective on multispecies leisure and the horse-human relationship in events. Leisure Studies, 1–14. doi:10.1080/02614367.2019.1586981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. L., Maurstad, A., & Dean, S. (2016). ‘I’d rather wear out than rust out’: Autobiologies of ageing equestriennes. Ageing & Society, 36(2), 333–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMello, M. (2012). Animals and society: An introduction to human-animal studies. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, R., Lloyd, K., & Suchet-Pearson, S. (2017). Qualitative methods II: ‘More-than-human’ methodologies and/in praxis. Progress in Human Geography, 41(6), 823–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkington, S., & Stebbins, R. (2014). The serious leisure perspective: An introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, D. A. (2011). Tourism and animal ethics. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, D. A. (2013). Tourism and animal welfare. Tourism Recreation Research, 38(3), 325–340.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, A. (2015). Handbook on animal-assisted therapy: Foundations and guidelines for animal assisted interventions. London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, R., & Danby, P. (2018). Legitimising leisure experiences as emotional work: A post-humanist approach to gendered equine encounters. Gender, Work and Organization. doi:10.1111/gwao.12268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, T., & Platt, L. (2018). (Just) a walk with the dog? Animal geographies and negotiating walking spaces. Social & Cultural Geography, 19(2), 211–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, A. (2019). Sport horse leisure and the phenomenology of interspecies embodiment. Leisure Studies, 1–12. doi:10.1080/02614367.2019.1584231
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. (2006). Animal behaviours, post-human lives: Everyday negotiations of the animal–Human divide in pet-keeping. Social & Cultural Geography, 7(4), 525–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, A., & Schuurman, N. (2017). Aging animal bodies: Horse retirement yards as relational spaces of liminality, dwelling and negotiation. Social & Cultural Geography, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Game, A. (2001). Riding: Embodying the centaur. Body & Society, 7(4), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M., & Gillett, J. (2012). Equine athletes and interspecies sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 47(5), 632–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M., & Gillett, J. (2014). Into the mountains and across the country: Emergent forms of equine adventure leisure in Canada. Loisir Et Société/Society and Leisure, 37(2), 313–325.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, D. L., Leffler, A., & Lerner, E. (2002). If it weren’t for my hobby, I’d have a life: Dog sports, serious leisure, and boundary negotiations. Leisure Studies, 21(3–4), 285–304.
   Google Scholar
• Gruen, L. (2011). Ethics and animals. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallberg, L. (2008). Walking the way of the horse: Exploring the power of the horse-human relationship. New York: iUniverse.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, J. (2019). Tuesdays with Worry: Appreciating nature with a dog at the end of life. Leisure Studies. doi:10.1080/02614367.2018.1534135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, E. (2010). Fingereyes: Impressions of cup corals. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 577–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockenhull, J., Birke, L., & Creighton, E. (2010). The horse’s tale: Narratives of caring for/about horses. Society & Animals, 18(4), 331–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultsman, W.Z. (2012). Couple involvement in serious leisure: examining participation in dog agility. Leisure Studies, 31(2), 231-253. doi:10.1080/02614367.2011.619010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurn, S. (2012). Humans and other animals: Cross cultural perspectives on human-animal interactions. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Instone, L. (1998). The coyote’s at the door: Revisioning human-environment relations in the Australian context. Cultural Geographies, 5(4), 452–467.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, L. (2004). Pampered or enslaved? The moral dilemmas of pets. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 24(9), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kirksey, S. E., & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause-Parello, C., Gulick, E., & Basin, B. (2019). Loneliness, depression and physical activity in older adults: The therapeutic role of human-animal interactions. Anthrozoos, 32(2), 239–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linghede, E. (2019). Becoming horseboy(s) – Human-horse relations and intersectionality in equiscapes. Leisure Studies, 1–14. doi:10.1080/02614367.2019.1584230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimer, H. (2009). Posthumanism/posthumanistic geographies. International Encyclopedia of Human Geographies, 8, 344–354.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, R. (2014). Animals and the limits of ethnography. Anthrozoös, 27(2), 279–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinova, E., & Fox, D. (2019). An exploratory study of British Millennials’ attitudes to the use of live animals in events. Leisure Studies, 1–13. doi:10.1080/02614367.2019.1583766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markuksela, V., & Valtonen, A. (2019). Dance with a fish? Sensory human-nonhuman encounters in the waterscape of match fishing. Leisure Studies, 1–14. doi:10.1080/02614367.2019.1588353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markwell, K. (2015). Birds, beasts and tourists: Human-animal relationships in tourism. In K. Markwell (Ed.), Animals and tourism: Understanding diverse relationships (pp. 1–23). Bristol: Channel View Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Markwell, K. (2019). Relating to reptiles: An autoethnographic account of animal–Leisure relationships. Leisure Studies. doi:10.1080/02614367.2018.1544657
   Google Scholar
• Maurstad, A., Davis, D., & Cowles, S. (2013). Co‐being and intra‐action in horse–Human relationships: A multispecies ethnography of be(com)ing human and be(com)ing horse. Social Anthropology, 21(3), 322–335.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, D. (2016). Dangerous dogs, dangerous owners and the waste management of an ‘irredeemable species’. Sociology, 50(3), 560–575.
   Google Scholar
• Nibert, D. (2003). Humans and other animals: Sociology’s moral and intellectual challenge. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(3), 4–25.
   Google Scholar
• Nimer, J., & Lundahl, B. (2007). Animal-assisted therapy: Meta-analysis. Anthrozoos, 20(3), 225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nottle, C., & Young, J. (2019). Individuals, instinct and moralities: Exploring multi-species leisure using the serious leisure perspective. Leisure Studies, 1–14. doi:10.1080/02614367.2019.1572777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., Taylor, A., & Blaise, M. (2016). Decentring the human in multispecies ethnographies. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 149–167). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Panelli, R. (2010). more-than-human social geographies: posthuman and other possibilities. Progress in Human Geography, 34(1), 79-87. doi:10.1177/0309132509105007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peggs, K. (2013). The ‘animal‐advocacy agenda’: Exploring sociology for non‐human animals. The Sociological Review, 61(3), 591–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, C. (2011). Non-human agency, radical ontology and tourism realities. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 858–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, P. C., & Braithwaite, D. (2001). Towards a conceptual framework for wildlife tourism. Tourism Management, 22(1), 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodger, K., Moore, S. A., & Newsome, D. (2009). Wildlife tourism, science and actor network theory. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(4), 645–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, L. (2017). ‘Every time they ride, I pray:’ Parents’ management of daughters’ horseback riding risks. Sociology of Sport Journal, 34(3), 259–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, C. (1990). The animal ‘other’: Self-definition, social identity and companion animals. Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 662–668.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, C. (1999). Understanding dogs. Temple: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sands, K. (2019). Shared spaces on the street: A multispecies ethnography of ex-racing greyhound street collections in South Wales, UK. Leisure Studies, 1–14. doi:10.1080/02614367.2019.1577904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigurðardóttir, I., & Helgadóttir, G. (2015). Riding high: Quality and customer satisfaction in equestrian tourism in Iceland. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 15(1–2), 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, E. (2019). What’s in it for the cats?: Cat shows as serious leisure from a multispecies perspective. Leisure Studies, 1–13. doi:10.1080/02614367.2019.1572776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Duim, R., Ampumuza, C., & Ahebwa, W. M. (2014). Gorilla tourism in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda: An actor-network perspective. Society & Natural Resources, 27(6), 588–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warkentin, T. (2010). Interspecies etiquette: An ethics of paying attention to animals. Ethics & the Environment, 15(1), 101–121.
   Google Scholar
• Warkentin, T. (2011). Interspecies etiquette in place: Ethical affordances in swim-with-dolphins programs. Ethics & the Environment, 16(1), 99–122.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., & Rose, J. (2019). A predator in the park: Mixed methods analysis of user preference for coyotes in urban parks. Leisure Studies, 1–17. doi:10.1080/02614367.2019.1586979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wipper, A. (2000). The partnership: The horse‐rider relationship in eventing. Symbolic Interaction, 23(1), 47–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J., & Carr, N. (2018). Domestic animals, humans, and leisure: Rights, welfare, and wellbeing. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar