Evaluations of Social Work Education: A Critical Review

References

• Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London: New Left Books.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1994). The reinvention of politics in: Towards a theory of reflexive modernisation. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernisation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• The College of Social Work. (no date). Professional capabilities Framework. Retrieved from: http://www.tcsw.org.uk/ProfessionalCapabilitiesFramework/ (accessed 24 October 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Croisdale-Appleby, D. (2014). Re-visioning social work education. An independent review. London: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, P. (2012). The evaluation society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2002). Requirements for social work training. London: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• European Schools of Social Work. (2014). Statement regarding the development of ‘Frontline’ graduate social work course in UK. Retrieved from: http://www.eassw.org/news/article-104/en/statement-regarding-the-development-of-%C3%A2%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BDfrontline-graduate-social-work-course-in-the-uk.html.
   Google Scholar
• Evaluation of the Social Work Degree Qualification in England Team. (2008). Evaluation of the new social work degree qualification in England (Vol. 1). London: King's College London, Social Care Workforce Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1974). Education for critical consciousness. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernisation (pp. 56–109). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gove, M. (2012). Social worker training scheme to target top graduates. The Guardian, Friday 16 November. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/nov/16/social-worker-training-graduates-gove.
   Google Scholar
• Haringey Local Safeguarding Board. (2009). Serious case review: Baby Peter. Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.haringeylscb.org/executive_summary_peter_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Heaphy, B. (2007). Late modernity and social change. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M. (2013) The dilemmas of contemporary social work: A case study of the social work degree  (A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of London South Bank University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy). July 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M. (2015). How has the professional capabilities framework changed social work education and practice in England? British Journal of Social Work. 10.1093/bjsw/bcv018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, M. (forthcoming). Child protection social work in England: How can it be reformed? British Journal of Social Work.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. (2006). Scientific advice, risk and evidence-based policy making. Seventh Report of Session 2005–2006 (Vol. I). London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers. (2014). Global definition of Social Work. Retrieved from http://ifsw.org/policies/definition-of-social-work/(accessed 27 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Joint University Council Social Work Education Committee and Association of Professors of Social Work. (2013). Frontline: Joint statement from JUC SWEC and APSW.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M., Stevenson, L., Cairney, P., & Taylor, K. (2003). Does devolution make a difference? Legislative output and policy divergence in Scotland. Journal of Legislative Studies, 9, 110–139. doi:10.1080/1357233042000246882.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, E. R. (2015). What if ‘what works’ doesn't? Evaluation, 21, 167–172. doi:10.1177/1356389015577505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacAlister, J., with Crehan, L., & Olsen, A. (2012). Front line: Improving the children's social work profession. Retrieved from http://www.nccesb.org.uk/pdfs/publication-frontline-childrens-social-work_Oct2012_9705.pdf (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: He organisational basics of politics. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGhee, J., & Waterhouse, L. (2011). Locked out of prevention? The identity of child and family-oriented social work in Scottish post-devolution policy. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 1088–1104, Advance Access publication November 15, 2010.10.1093/bjsw/bcq121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriarty, J., & Manthorpe, J. (2013). Shared expectations? Reforming the social work qualifying curriculum in England. Social Work Education, 32, 841–853. doi:10.1080/02615479.2012.723683.
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty, J., & Murray, J. (2007). Who wants to be a social worker? Using routine published data to identify trends in the numbers of people applying for and completing social work programmes in England. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 715–733. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narey, M. (2014). Making the education of social workers consistently effective. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/278741/Social_worker_education_report.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (1998). Risk, advanced liberalism and child welfare: The need to rediscover uncertainty and ambiguity. British Journal of Social Work, 28, 5–27. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersén, A. C., & Olsson, J. I. (2014). An evaluation paradox in social work? An empirical study of evaluation use in connection with temporary programmes in Swedish social work. European Journal of Social Work, 17, 175–191. doi:10.1080/13691457.2013.802226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, C. (2010). What shapes the influence evidence has on policy? The role of politics in research utilisation. Oxford: Young Lives, Department of International Development.
   Google Scholar
• Reichborn-Kjennerud, K. (2014). Performance audit and the importance of the public debate. Evaluation, 20, 368–385. doi:10.1177/1356389014539869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleebey, D., & Scanlon, E. (2005). Is a critical pedagogy for the profession of social work possible? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 25(3-4), 1–18. doi:10.1300/J067v25n03_01.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scourfield, J., de Villiers, T., Hadfield, M., Henderson, M., Holland, S., Kinnersley, P., & Maxwell, N. (2014). Protocol for the DfE-funded evaluation of the Frontline pilot. Cardiff: Cascade, Children's Social Care Research and Development Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134, 52–59. doi:10.1162/0011526054622015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, G. (2014). Social workers affecting social policy in England. In J. Gal & I. Weiss-Gal (Eds.), Social workers affecting social policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, G., & Cowden, S. (2009). The social worker as intellectual. European Journal of Social Work, 12, 479–493. doi:10.1080/13691450902840689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Work Reform Board. (2010). Building a safe and confident future: One year on. Progress report from the Social Work Reform Board. Retrieved from: http://www.hpc-uk.org/assets/documents/10003287Building-a-safe-and-confident-future-detailedproposals.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Social Work Task Force. (2009a). Retrieved from: http://www.swap.ac.uk/docs/taskforceinterim_rpt.pdf. Facing up to the Task. The interim report of the Social Work Task Force.
   Google Scholar
• Social Work Task Force. (2009b). Building a safe, confident future: The final report of the Social Work Task Force. Retrieved from: https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/01114-2009DOM-EN.pdfAccessed: 09/06/12.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programmes and policies (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., Hall, C., & Peckover, S. (2009). The descriptive tyranny of the common assessment framework: Technologies of categorization and professional practice in child welfare. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 1197–1217. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar